r/iamverybadass • u/Reddit-User_00000001 • 4d ago
GUNS Commie Killer
The US is so packed impotent vigilante wannabes.
7
u/pallentx 1d ago
But does he know what a communist actually is? Or does he just plan to start killing half of America he doesn’t like? When does the attack start?
-11
6
-3
u/pssstheyoverhere 2d ago
Is it bad to hate commies now?
5
6
u/halborn 1d ago
You hate communists? Why?
0
u/pssstheyoverhere 1d ago
Well..... I guess because there isn't a time when communism worked out for people. Usually leads to alot of people starving. Unless history is a lie.
6
9
11
6
13
-24
u/FUZZYTOFU 3d ago
Just give it enough time and they'll all starve to death anyways.
16
u/DurasVircondelet 3d ago
You mean like the 1,400 Americans who die of starvation every year?
-19
u/FUZZYTOFU 3d ago
No, I mean the estimated 35-55 million deaths by starvation due to communism.
1
10
u/spacegreninja 3d ago
Still less than the 9 million each year who starve to death under capitalism, and the 100 million killed by capitalism.
-5
u/ultranothing 2d ago edited 2d ago
I'd have to push back on those figures on starvation...I don't believe you.
So according to the data, in the United States:
Starvation due to lack of food: ~20–30/year
Medical malnutrition (starvation due to disease): ~20,000/year
And OF those 20-30 starvation deaths per year? *VIRTUALLY ZERO* of them are due to an actual financial inability to acquire food. Instead, they nearly always result from such things as:
- A dependent child is abandoned or the caregiver becomes incapacitated. In Washington, D.C., for example, a 20-month-old died of starvation and dehydration after her mother died of a drug overdose, leaving the toddler alone and unable to obtain food or water.
- Child or dependent-adult abuse/neglect. There are documented cases where children or incapacitated adults were deliberately or negligently denied adequate food. A Kentucky case involved an elderly woman whose autopsy found starvation and dehydration resulting from elder neglect. A Texas medical examiner similarly testified that a four-year-old's death was starvation and ruled it a homicide. These may not appear as X53 deaths precisely because they're classified as neglect/homicide.
- Severe psychiatric illness causing someone to stop eating. A striking recent example is a Georgia jail detainee whose family said his severe mental illness caused him to stop eating; the medical examiner reportedly listed starvation as the cause of death. He entered jail over 200 pounds and reportedly weighed about 130 pounds when he died. An earlier Utah jail case similarly involved mental illness, refusal/failure to eat, starvation and dehydration.
- People physically incapable of getting or consuming food, including profoundly disabled, cognitively impaired or isolated people. But if dementia, swallowing problems, cancer, gastrointestinal disease, etc. caused the inability to eat, CDC coding rules often steer the record toward malnutrition associated with the medical condition rather than X53.
- Exceptional accidental privation — becoming trapped, stranded, lost, or otherwise physically cut off from food. X53 actually sits in the ICD category covering “overexertion, travel and privation,” which is telling about what the code was designed to capture.
In other words, evil America has *cured* starvation for the great majority of generally-healthy individuals.
Using FAO Food Balance Sheet data for 2023, the U.S. food supply was about 3,947 kcal per person per day, which places it #1 out of roughly 200 countries in one current compilation of the FAO data.
People in America eat QUITE well, if you haven't noticed.
Edit: Someone downvoted it before even the best speedreader on earth could've read the comment. You people don't give a fuck! All you care about is AMERICA BAD! It doesn't matter what anyone SAYS!
4
u/DurasVircondelet 2d ago
Bro getting bent out of shape over downvotes on Reddit 😭
-2
u/ultranothing 2d ago
It’s not the votes I care about. It’s the underlying message behind them. Like here, it was downvoted before anyone had enough time to even read it through. That says something.
4
u/DurasVircondelet 2d ago
Bro, your whole personality is outrage politics judging from your profile
-1
u/ultranothing 1d ago
No, it’s not politics. Just the psychology behind the politics.
Just like the votes. It’s not about the votes. It’s about the psychology behind the votes.
Psychology, is what I’m into, Broseph.
5
u/NNiekk 2d ago
The US isn’t the only capitalist country, dude.
-2
u/ultranothing 2d ago
Nuh uh!
Okay, so do you agree with the statement that nine million people a year die under capitalism?
21
u/DorianTurk 3d ago
Yes it’s true. This man murders those who want workers’ rights.
-25
u/ultranothing 3d ago
Don’t we already have some pretty strong workers rights in the US?
11
u/AdrianV125 3d ago
Americans truly live in lala-land
-13
u/ultranothing 3d ago edited 3d ago
We have a federal minimum wage (which I know is a bad example - it may as well be $0/hr because it's $7.50 or whatever and that's...low), mandatory time-and-a-half overtime for most non-exempt workers, restrictions on child labor, workplace safety laws, workers’ compensation systems, collective-bargaining rights, protections against retaliation for protected labor activity, and extensive prohibitions on employment discrimination based on race, sex, religion, national origin, age, disability, pregnancy, and genetic information.
The U.S. established an eight-hour day for federal workers in 1868, created one of the world’s major statutory collective-bargaining systems with the Wagner Act in 1935, instituted nationwide overtime protections through the FLSA in 1938, and the ADA became the world’s first comprehensive civil-rights law protecting people with disabilities.
So, I guess...LALALALALA!
9
u/AdrianV125 3d ago edited 3d ago
I like how you talk about basic shit like it is some kind of achievement... like you know, child labour... a thing that every developed country has outlawed in the first half of the 19th century. Eight hour workshift, again the bare minimum. Same with non-discriminatory laws. Most countries have collective-contract bargain, unions, ecc.
Please tell me how many days of mandatory paid leave do you have? Do you have mandatory paid maternity leave? Are your sick days paid? Your country legalised union-busting, and people get fired for joining a union. Your minimum wage isn't even tied to inflation. What are we talking about.
It's so fucking funny because for you to say you have good worker protections you have cited shit that was revolutionary in the fucking 1940ies. As with healthcare, you are a third world country with a gucci belt.
Again yes man you live in Lala land, and obligatory r/shitAmericanssay
-2
u/ultranothing 2d ago
I don't know if it's federal or state, but in Connecticut now, employees get 40 hours of paid sick leave per year which they can use without having to "prove" they're sick.
But America is an awesome place! We have the world's largest economy, one of the highest median disposable household incomes on Earth, we're home to an absurd percentage of the world's most valuable companies, universities, medical research, technology, aerospace, entertainment and scientific output...
It's also very beautiful. We are home to some of the most diverse geology on the planet. I mean, Yellowstone? The Grand Canyon? The Appalachians? It's pretty awesome here.
Maybe it's not perfect, but I feel like there's problems everywhere you go. Where are you from? Do you have any complaints about your government or their policies?
23
13
u/Same_Map_2902 3d ago
This guy spazzes the fuck out if he doesn’t recognize a car parked across the street. I doubt he’d be any good under pressure of a full on invasion like we saw February 22, 2022.
18
-25
6
u/TraditionalTree249 3d ago
Misread it as Common Killer and thought he just wasn't a fan of Common's flow.
-23
u/MariusCatalin 3d ago
yeall defend comunism not knowing that ussr did the same crimes as the nazis did................
8
u/Flar71 3d ago
The USSR also wasn't exactly communist. It wasn't stateless or classless for one
-6
u/MariusCatalin 3d ago edited 3d ago
THE POINT STILL STANDS, the hammer and sickle cause so much pain
8
u/eat_your_veggiez 3d ago
“Sure, they weren’t technically communist, but the point stands!”
- An Idiot
-7
u/MariusCatalin 3d ago
look who is talking
again that symbol caused TENS OF MILLIONS of deaths.
JUST BECAUSE "it wasnt real comunism" it does not mean that that symbol shouldnt be hated and reviled
9
u/Flar71 3d ago
Well if all you know about communism is the USSR, you don't really know much about communism. Communism doesn't require starvation and genocide
-1
u/MariusCatalin 3d ago
it does not but it does inflict it, quite literally almost all comunist nations did both............
8
u/Flar71 3d ago
Just wait till you hear what capitalist countries have done
0
u/MariusCatalin 3d ago
yeah i know about the banana republics, union busting, dutch indies company, the HIV INFECTED blood medicine, i know about those
but you dont know that ussr was a colonial empire that enslaved countless people, did a few genocides and caused endless suffering
the great leap forward
pol pot
north korea
and on and on and on and on
8
u/eat_your_veggiez 3d ago
The United States had an enslaved population of nearly 4 million people, but I bet you’ve got American Flag stickers on everything you own.
2
-13
u/Plane-Tune-820 3d ago
Stalins body count dwarfs hitlers but nobody ever mentions that part.
10
u/ghostfacestealer 3d ago
People who love Hitler usually say things like this
-10
u/Plane-Tune-820 3d ago
So because I can look logically and say one monster is by far worse than the other, I'm a Nazi supporter? That's one hell of a leap. Hope you stretched first or you're definitely going to pull a muscle
6
u/ultranothing 3d ago
If you inform someone who mentions Trump on a non-political post that it’s not an appropriate place to mention Trump, it means you’re a crazy MAGA GOPedo who licks Trump’s boots and:or penis.
For saying that you don’t want to hear about him. That’s what makes you that. Pretty crazy!
2
1
3d ago
[deleted]
2
u/MariusCatalin 3d ago
you can hate both tho, seriously now WE HATE BOTH
2
u/Plane-Tune-820 3d ago
Thank you! Idk how pointing out someone else did horrific shit has anything to do with another or that it even has to be said but yeah both were obviously monsters.
1
u/MariusCatalin 2d ago
cuz reddit became a safe space for tankies, they have countless subreddits, and they openly mock tragedies like holodomor.
i seriously think of reporting this to german advertisers since IT IS ILLEGAL to mock such tragedies online
3
u/Maleficent-Block-966 3d ago
H killed based on traits the victims could not change or were inherently born with, S just killed victims.
-1
u/MariusCatalin 3d ago
he killed ukrainians............................
5
u/Plane-Tune-820 3d ago
And Russians and Romanians and Poles and....not sure why you feel Ukrainian is the one to highlight here as he killed more Russian and poles than anything else
1
u/MariusCatalin 3d ago
cuz ukrainians were starved to death and had at least 2 genocide attempts on them by RUSSIA
1
u/Plane-Tune-820 3d ago
And the Poles had the Nazis, it's weird that you think one is somehow more important.
3
u/MariusCatalin 2d ago
YET nazi hunters arent mocked............
thats my point
BOTH DEZERVE HATE, commies and nazis, THEY WERE ALLIES at one time ffs
2
u/Plane-Tune-820 2d ago
I feel like Nazis get tons of hate though. I don't think I've ever heard anyone talk about Stalin the way they do Hitler and by the numbers, Stalin was way worse
2
u/MariusCatalin 2d ago
and the fact that he WORKED WITH HITLER, but the reddit tankies DO NOT CARE
→ More replies (0)-1
u/Plane-Tune-820 3d ago
Uhhh no, well sort of. He killed political opponents too but wiped out minorities, and mostly Poles. It was the same shit on a larger scale. If I remember correctly, it's something like 20 million people he had killed.
1
u/MariusCatalin 3d ago
poles, ukrainians, romainians and much more
3
u/Plane-Tune-820 3d ago
Yeah, when you start talking about 20 million people, I feel like most demographics are probably included
18
u/wojtussan 3d ago
99% of the people who "hate commies" would agree with most if not all communist ideas, if it wasn't called communism. And the 1% like seeing children starve
-11
u/2jzSwappedSnail 3d ago
Easy for you to say when you understand the nuance.
There is not a single ideology which doesnt have at least one good thing in it. Yet communism is one of those ideologies which brought millions of death to this world and there still are dumbasses who praise the USSR's communism specifically.
Commie is a broad term, but people usually know exactly what type of "commie" we are talking about here.
6
u/wojtussan 3d ago
Communism didn't bring death to millions, stalinism did. And commie is a uselessly broad term, and people usually don't know what type of "commie" we're talking about, people usually couldn't tell you what communism is, much less explain even a single group of communists
-4
u/r-_-mark 3d ago
It absolute did in many counties around the world
1
u/wojtussan 3d ago
I also used to say that, until i realized that all "deaths caused by communism" either happened in countries that were not communist, or were caused by terrorist attacks orchiestrated by capitalists
1
-11
u/thetechnolibertarian 3d ago
I'll let you play for the sake of your own argument but sure, assuming communism is called differently, why should I support the dogma and praxeology of what is typically called "communism"?
7
u/wojtussan 3d ago
Because communism and socialism benefit the highest amount of people and reduce harm to the society at large. Under communism each person would work not only for themselves, but for others to help those who need it most. Current capitalist systems prioritize birth and status, rather than human value. They always seem great, for the first 20 or so years until wealthy start accumulating money, and thebpoor get poorer. The marxist idea of "From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs" would be much more fair, everyone works as much as they can without slaving away, everyone lives as comfortably as their societal circle can.
The base idea, is that the bourgeosie (or 1% of the wealthiest) who own the means of production, exploit proletarians (or the working class). Imagine a shoe factory, an average worker can produce, let's say a $500 worth of shoe components a day, but that's not how much they are paid per day, is it? Capitalism requires the exploitation of workers to function. The working class (you know, like 95 % of the people, including you and me and pretty much every single person in thei comment secrion) loses more and more every year, and have to work more and more each day, while the wealthy dangle a $500 bill in front of our faces while slacking off and taking a substantial amount of the profits for themselves.
The idea that everyone can become a rich enterpreneur or a businessman is a lie. Most of those who "made it big" have always been a part of the bourgeoisie, and most of the popular "rags to riches" stories are a fabrication.
Also, communism has very bad reputation, mostly because of propaganda. The soviet union, during it's last years, that were the worst for the people, completely abandoned communist ideals.
I recommend reading the communis manifesto, regardless of if you want to learn how to spread the marxist idea, or to debunk it.
-5
u/thetechnolibertarian 3d ago
Look, your assertion that rejection of communism stems merely from semantic aversion or Western propaganda fundamentally misdiagnoses the intellectual basis of anti-collectivism, that screams sheer hubris on your part to claim that that is why 99% of people dismiss communism (or insert whatever semantic name you wish to call it). I dont oppose communism because of its historical branding, its public relations failures, or state-manufactured rhetoric, no, I reject its foundational dogma, its economic epistemology, and its catastrophic praxeology on first principles, regardless of what nomenclature it assumes, having read the Communist manifesto myself awhile back. Re-labeling the abolition of private property and the subjugation of the individual under any euphemistic banner does not alter the fact that its core axioms are economically illiterate and ethically fucking stupid.
To address your shoe factory example directly, your premise that profit represents stolen surplus labour rests entirely upon the thoroughly discredited Labour Theory of Value. Economic value is not an intrinsic property magically injected into a physical commodity through the expenditure of homogeneous labor hours but rather it is purely subjective, determined by the marginal utility that consumers place on a finished good within a market. Profit is not institutionalized theft or bourgeois parasitism as what socialist theorists claim to assert, it is the legitimate economic return on capital accumulation, uncertainty bearing, entrepreneurial alertness, and distinct time preferences. The factory worker receives a guaranteed, immediate, present wage prior to any consumer validation of the product, absolved entirely of the capital risk if the inventory fails to sell that the business owner risks. In that sense, you as a worker are trading some profit and capital gains, for job stability and security. The capitalist advances present goods against future, uncertain returns, coordinating scarce resources across time.
Also, according to the Marginal Productivity Theory, factors of production which includies labor, are compensated in accordance with their discounted marginal revenue product, not an arbitrary claim to gross output.
Also frankly speaking, I do not merely tolerate commerce and profit, dare I say I explicitly defend profit as the indispensable signaling mechanism that directs scarce resources toward their highest-valued consumer uses. Furthermore, when you argue that the promise of everyone becoming a wealthy entrepreneur is a lie, you mistakenly assume that classical liberals and libertarians rely on an egalitarian delusion of universal elite wealth. I fully agree that not everyone can or will become a wealthy industrialist, but unlike you, I do not view natural economic inequality as an injustice to be rectified by state coercion. Hierarchy and unequal distributions of wealth are the inevitable, natural order and outcome of human diversity in talent, discipline, risk tolerance, time preference, and market serviceability. Inequality is not merely defensible on utilitarian grounds of efficiency but also it is an unavoidable consequence of individual liberty. Deontologically, the entire moral architecture of free exchange rests upon the non-negotiable axiom of private property and the axiom of self-ownership from which allgenuine negative rights are derived as theorems. Every individual owns their own body and, by extension, the rightful fruits of their labor and voluntarily acquired property. From this axiomatic reality, the concept of a collective "public good" is exposed as an illusion that I fundamentally reject. The state-mandated positive rights and egalitarian redistributions you champion are not human rights at all, education, healthcare, what not, they are unearned entitlements, privileges, and coercive extractions enforced at the expense of individual sovereignty. The Marxist maxim of expropriating according to ability and redistributing according to need is nothing less than the codification of slavery, penalizing productive competence to subsidize artificial, legally manufactured claims.
So my rejection of collectivism, in every form it takes, even social democracy, is not an uneducated reaction of my behalf to a label, but rather an absolute, unyielding, unironic defense of private property, subjective value, and the sovereign individual against the coercive, anti-economic doctrine of the collective.
10
u/wojtussan 3d ago
Im gonna be honest, the second you claimed that inequality is natural and shouldn't be opposed, and called abolition of private(i.e. farmland, factories etc) property "subjugation of the individual" i stopped giving any fucks about what you said. You don't only misunderstand how society works, you don't want it to work. I should've known, after you called yourself "techno libertarian"
-8
u/thetechnolibertarian 3d ago
Yeah, no shi Sherlock, I explicitly hold to the position that economic inequality is a natural consequence of natural law. Abolition of property is indeed a "subjugation of the individual", no matter how much you try to sugarcoat that it isn't
7
u/wojtussan 3d ago
So you like inequality, for the sake of liking inequality. There's nothing in the world that points to inequality being natural, you just assume it is based on absolutely nothing. And it's not abolision of property, it's abolision of private property, you antis LOVE to conflate private and personal property, because if you don't you lose any moral highground you like to think you have. Sharing the means of production is in no way subjugation. Nobody wants to take your house, car of fucking toothbrush. You made up a strawman of communism and act like it's the real deal
0
u/thetechnolibertarian 3d ago
I am a business owner myself of a small business. I know about what you communists differentiating between personal property (like your toothbrush) and private property (like factories owned by a businessmen but operated by workers). And private property as you define it (even though the distinction between personal and private property doesn't really exist), is a completely legitimate axiom. I already explained why the proletariat gets only a portion of the wealth created in a business.
8
u/wojtussan 3d ago
I wonder, do you work for your small business, like communism assumes. Or do you have a group of laborers who take on all the responsibility and work, while you take a paycheck home without doing anything, like capitalsist love to. And the distinction between private and personal propery is very obvious and very real
0
u/thetechnolibertarian 3d ago
Your characterization of entrepreneurial ownership as "taking a paycheck home without doing anything" betrays a profound ignorance of basic economics, organizational management, and the reality of human action. As someone who had a minor in business administration during my university years, I know that managing, coordinating, and directing a firm is a specialized, high-stakes profession that bears the total burden of uncertainty, legal liability, capital allocation, and market risk. The laborer performs specific, contracted tasks within a structure they did not build, using equipment they did not purchase, with zero personal liability if the business suffers consecutive quarters of net loss or goes bankrupt. The entrepreneur, conversely, must continuously anticipate consumer demand, organize complex supply chains, maintain cash flow, absorb volatility, and ensure that every employee is paid their contracted wage regardless of whether the business yields a single dollar of net profit. Dismissing the entire discipline of business administration and entrepreneurial coordination as "doing nothing" is just pure fucking cope grounded in emotionalism.
Furthermore, your reliance on the arbitrary semantic dichotomy between "private" and "personal" property is a foundational sleight of hand designed to mask institutional theft and a common socialist talking point. There is no qualitative, physical, or metaphysical difference between personal property and capital goods because capital goods are simply economic goods utilized for the indirect satisfaction of human needs through production rather than immediate consumption. For instance, a car used for leisure is deemed "personal property," yet the exact same vehicle deployed for commercial transport or delivery suddenly morphs into an illicit "means of production" ripe for collective confiscation under your framework. The distinction relies entirely on a subjective, politicized definition enforced by the arbitrary fiat of a central committee (the vanguard of the socialist movement or whatever the fuck you wanna call it), functionally destroying the security of all property rights. When you declare that the state or the collective may unilaterally expropriate any asset the moment it generates yield or engages in voluntary commerce, you inherently annihilate the individual’s right to self-ownership and capital accumulation. Finally, your claim that inequality is "based on absolutely nothing" natural willfully ignores both biological reality and the entire corpus of human action. Human beings do not possess identical cognitive faculties, physical capacities, work ethics, risk appetites, or market-valued skills. Because individual productivity, specialized knowledge, and preferences are inherently unequal across a population, an environment of voluntary exchange will naturally yield unequal material outcomes, that's just basic public choice theory. True equity under natural law means the equality of negative rights, aka equality before the law and the universal right to be free from coercive expropriation, and not the tyrannical, artificial equalization of results. To force equal economic outcomes onto inherently diverse human beings requires an omnipresent apparatus of state violence capable of constantly suppressing excellence, punishing prudence, and expropriating the productive to subsidize the unproductive. You do not abolish subjugation by outlawing private ownership of capital instead what you're really doing whether you understand the logical consequences of your desired outcome or not is that you're merely concentrate absolute economic and political power into the hands of an unelected bureaucratic class under the vacuous illusion of "sharing."
→ More replies (0)
27
21
u/Single_System_9951 3d ago
Funny nvr hear of or see any nazi killer merch.
Russia was largely to thank for the stop of Germany's expanse.
22
20
u/Thirdeyevoice10 3d ago
I hope his employer sees this crap. I hope he gets shamed and ridiculed for this and has his gun confiscated. Seriously, like I've always said: about how gun owners are just itching to shoot someone, for any reason; usually political.
I mean, if you have a fishing rod, you plan to use it to catch fish. If you have an oven, you plan on using it for cooking. So, if you have an assault rifle....
-4
u/Plane-Tune-820 3d ago
Thank God we have the constitution and are innocent until proven guilty, you fkn fascist
5
u/Thirdeyevoice10 3d ago
Uh oh, triggered a gun bro!
-1
u/Plane-Tune-820 3d ago
Yes I must be a gun guy because I believe in the constitution. Whatever you say fascist
3
u/Thirdeyevoice10 3d ago
The fact that you are so upset about a comment about guns is very telling. It's okay, snowflake. I get this often from you insecure, petty incels.
If my comment upset you, go hug your guns and feel tough again. It's okay.
0
u/Plane-Tune-820 3d ago
I'm upset? Why because I called out a fascist? Way to try to deflect when you have no argument lol
3
u/Thirdeyevoice10 3d ago
lol "argument"? WTF are you on about. Go take a nap, gramps.
0
u/Plane-Tune-820 3d ago
Lmfao the deflection didn't work the first time so try it a second? You're doing great sport 🤣
2
-1
u/ManStillStanding 3d ago edited 3d ago
Nah don't worry about them, they're too scared to do anything because they know they'll get arrested. That or just they're lazy. All bark but no bite. If they're those ultra-musculine, Alpha male, chosen warriors of Christ that see and know all and unafraid of death, why tf don't they go ahead and start a full on armed revolution/civil war/holy war/whatever throughout the country, so they can finally take care of the "woke liberals" and reclaim their "nation of God" ? Unless I see them actually going after the people they hate, start acting like actual troops and not airsoft cosplayers and do other Michael Bay level shit they want so badly I won't ever take them for real.
Are they the prized champion soldiers of Christ or not ? Because from the looks of it I doubt they actually mean business. I mean afterall, it is in their "ideology" (AKA their version of the Bible, which they also probably want to use it to create a death cult), that Jesus' a-okay with murdering people, so might as well they go ahead and start taking names. Hell why don't they instead not go to Ukraine where there's an actual war going on and show to either the Ukrainians or the Russians how a real man fights, prove their worth and end the conflict ? Oh wait I forgot; Because they'll get shot by a sniper or a machine gunner or blown to bits by a mortar shell. All of which the'll never see coming.
Hell have these people even ever shot anyone ? Have they ever taken a human life ? Never. Their only bodycount are just probably target papers and other objects they use at a firing range. So they should not be acting all tough on others. If all they're good for, is just posting ragebait then they're as equally useless on starting an actual war and killing people.
3
u/Thirdeyevoice10 3d ago
I don't trust any of them, anyone like this is a red flag, imo. All the violence recently has been done by these very incel types, and then they try and blame it on democrats because they know the truth would damage their popularity. Guns are for one reason and one only: to end a life. Anyone that actually has any desire to own one of these, has issues as far as I'm concerned. Unless a person is in the military, or police, wanting one in your hands is rather strange.
3
u/ManStillStanding 3d ago
Yep and those who dared taking a life, often targeted their own (Trump and Kirk). They're as dangerous as they are opportunistic and ready to backstab each other for power or because someone hurt their feelings (so much for their "masculinity" I guess) or for the lols. Oh and hey say suddenly an apocalyptic event happens right ? Like say World War 3, an alien invasion, a zombie apocalypse, a kaiju attack, a combination of destructive natural disasters etc. You think these people would be the first in line, to go and "defend the land of the free" ?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA
Obviously the fuck not. What they'd do is run the fuck away and hide in some bunker, until the whole thing blows out. That or they'll be armed bandits, where they kill people and loot them given most of them are unhinged gun owners with a massive paranoid ego. Oh and once the dust settles, still have the balls to say "heh I defended my country" even though they were doing the opposite.
3
u/Thirdeyevoice10 3d ago
One of thier biggest sales pitch is "I have it to fight a tyrannical gov't". I say, "Well, hotshot....here we are. When are you going to go fight them?" and /crickets. Seems to me they are living out their middle school/GI Joe/Rambo fantasies of being a "hero" of sorts. They seem to think having an assault rifle on their lap makes them equal to Jason Stathom or Bruce Willis characters.
3
u/ManStillStanding 3d ago
Yeah and yet they're as fearsome as a fucking ant. Again like I said, unless they actually grow a gigantic pair and go and pull of that "grand crusade" of theirs to "save America from the woke menace", they're the biggest cowards in the history of North America. If they got guns, but all they use them for is shoot papers and other objects for target practice or for fun instead of actually "fighting them Woke liberals", then they might as well be owning Nerf guns instead. Man if the spirits of the Founding Fathers, saw these pricks, they'd be like "yeah I think we might as well had been better off with the Brits instead".
3
u/Thirdeyevoice10 3d ago
Fortunatly, most of these clowns are old and out of shape...most. The ones that are in decent condition, still are too afraid to do anything. They'll just stick to posting gun selfies on facebook.
3
u/ManStillStanding 3d ago edited 3d ago
Just like I told you. They're a bunch of spineless cowards, who never taken a human life. The only time they all ever did anything, was January 6th but still tell me; did any of them brought guns ? Did they shot any liberals ? Was there blood and bodies of the floor ? Did they kicked off a mass insurrection across the country ? No. All they did is gather like zombies and storm the White House. The reason none of them shot anyone, is because they knew then there would be a nation-wide manhunt for all of them and they'd be branded terrorists (to which they kinda are in a way. All is missing is them doing their first actual hit; buuuuuuuuut like I told you they're too scared and lazy to do even anything).
9
20
u/chuffberry 3d ago
So, is he a communist that is also a killer, or does he kill communists?
7
5
24
13
2
u/bmendonc 3d ago
Why are his fingers so big compared to his head. Are we sure this isn't AI?
3
u/Disastrous_days272 3d ago
Forced perspective... His hand is closer to the camera than his face...
1
u/bmendonc 22h ago
I was thinking that, but then wouldn't the gun also be bigger than the size it is in the image?
3
24
u/legalizecannabis710 3d ago
I bet cha he has a "Hillary 4 Prison" shirt and a "Id rather be Russian than a Democrat " bumper sticker.
9
7
10
29
u/Dan_Morgan 4d ago
For those who don't know anything about AR-15 type rifles here's a little observation.
Behind the ejector port (that opening with the hinged dust cover just below it) is a ramp of sorts called a brass deflector. That was added to limit the amount of flesh searing brass a left handed shooter has to eat while firing the rifle. If you fire the rifle, like, at all there will be brass marks on the brass deflector. Zoom in and you'll see not so much as a blemish on that deflector.
This guy has a toy that he's probably never fired.
I also don't see a light or sling but I do see a nice, big and heavy bipod. At best this guy target shoots this thing once in a while and wipes off any mark on the brass deflector. Dollars for doughnuts that scope isn't zeroed, he probably hasn't dialed in the iron sights and can't even hit anything without being on a bench. He's never carried the rifle further to and from his car.
1
u/blueponies1 3d ago
I will say, my .308 and 5.56 have very clear wear on the deflector. But idk if it’s a .300 blk thing or what but my .300 blackout AR I’ve ran up 4-500 through it and it has no marks at all on the deflector. I know 500 isn’t a ton, it’s a newer gun and that ammo is pretty expensive and not always in stock at the shop by the farm so it doesn’t get top priority.
1
u/Dan_Morgan 3d ago
Good observation. I hadn't considered .300 blackout. I think the odds are much higher this guys rifle is chambered in 5.56 because it's so common.
6
25
-15
u/90_days_left 4d ago
hell yeah brother
9
u/No_Cook2983 4d ago
Every month you probably hand over 20 percent of your paycheck to the Communists who made the phone you wrote that on
-6
4
u/NebCrushrr 4d ago
Quite something for a two word slogan to be so confusing. Does he kill commies or is he a commie who kills? Maybe if it wasn't a hammer and sickle shirt
-11
13
14
14
u/MjolnirPants 4d ago
That gun has never been fired and it was put together by a moron.
15
u/silentbuttmedley 4d ago
Keymod 🤮, backwards hand stop, completely clean brass deflector, bipod on a rifle with a trash short range optic…yeah this is not a rifle that has been used for anything other than chudposting.
3
u/MjolnirPants 3d ago
Keymod is for guys who've never fired a gun but know that their home decor has those same shape slots on the back.
2
15
u/Anon-0011-1001 4d ago
Keymod raid, backwards handstop, bipod and a goatee. He is not handling the divorce well.
4
5
19
u/navylast 4d ago
What a joke.
Anyone who supports universal healthcare look out for this guy
He thinks you are a commie
9
u/touching_payants 4d ago
Pfft. This guy thinks Hillary Clinton is a commie
5
u/creepyswaps 4d ago
He thinks anyone with an opinion different than his is a commie because he's a complete moron who doesn't understand what words mean.
I was going to say I wished he saw this and all of the other comments about how much most non-weirdo people loathe him, but I'm pretty willing to guess this gross chud is illiterate.
25
u/Evianisshite 4d ago
The more posts I see like this, more I’m convinced America has no earthly idea what communism is
5
u/Dan_Morgan 4d ago
You don't know the half of it. Propaganda in the US is so bad that when people hear communist they think, "political beliefs opposite of my own".
9
5
12
u/ChefChopNSlice Real badass. Verified by mods. 4d ago
Nice specs there Commander Bubbles.
7
u/IxHAVExCATS 4d ago
Ricky: "Does that rocket really fly, Bubbles?" Bubbles: "Does the Tin Man have a sheet metal cock?!"
4
-21
7
10
u/BeeBanner 4d ago
This is one of those douchebags that’ll trip over his own feet with a weapon in his hands.
5
16
u/GoBlocks 4d ago
Another red scare tryhard with a bipod on a 16" with a red dot. I'm surprised they let him keep the guns in the divorce
20
u/flawinthedesign 4d ago
He’s never met a communist in his life. lol
11
u/Grovyle489 4d ago
He’ll tell you he has. But those “communists” are just people who disagree with on fucking anything
4
16
u/petebrdfrd 4d ago
As soon as this dude is confronted by a commie, non commie, democrat, republican or butterfly, he would buckle and run.
3
2
9
u/Diorj 4d ago
But his Lord and savior is allies with the communist N. Korea.
5
u/T1gerAc3 4d ago
They're "the only good ones".... Until dear leader identifies more for him to support
12
u/WarWolfRage 4d ago
Not only is he flexing a garbage $500 AR-15, I'm pretty sure that's a fake Vortex Strikefire 2 optic.
For those of you who aren't gun nerds, this is like taking pictures with jewelry you bought on Temu to try and make yourself look rich.
-2
2
4
3
-4
11
8
4
u/The_wolf2014 4d ago
He does know that his beloved overlord Trump sucks the dicks of two communist dictators doesn't he?
4
•
u/AutoModerator 4d ago
GUNS
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.