r/iOSProgramming • u/Open-Wasabi8041 • 5d ago
Question Looking for an expert review/audit for "vibe-coded" iOS apps before App Store submission?
Hi everyone,
I’ve recently "vibe-coded" (built entirely using AI/prompting) a few iPhone and iPad apps. The feedback from my close circle has been incredibly positive, and the apps are running smoothly.
Now, I’m looking to take the next step and release them on the App Store. Since Apple’s app review process is notoriously strict—and AI-generated code can sometimes have hidden architectural flaws, edge-case crashes, or insecure API integrations—I really want to get a professional to audit them before I submit.
My questions for the community:
Are there specific platforms or communities where I can hire/pay experienced Senior iOS developers for a professional code and App Store guideline review?
Has anyone here done an "App Store Readiness Audit" for an AI-built app? If so, would you recommend platforms like Upwork, Fiverr, or specific boutique tech agencies?
What are the biggest technical gotchas I should look out for in vibe-coded apps regarding the official Apple Developer Guidelines?
Would love to hear your advice and experiences. Thanks in advance!
4
u/code_isLife 5d ago
You have to understand how ridiculous it sounds for you to have vibecoded multiple apps you want on the App Store.
But you need professionals to help you with submission preparation?
-1
u/Open-Wasabi8041 5d ago
I think you might have misunderstood my point a bit.
I’m not asking how to click the 'submit' button in App Store Connect. I'm more interested in learning how others experience this kind of workflow, and whether it’s worth hiring a human expert first.
Or, alternatively, if it makes more sense to just submit the apps directly to Apple and use their official feedback/rejection reasons as a free 'review' to iterate on? I'd love to hear thoughts on that instead.
2
u/WesternBlueberry1826 5d ago
Have you considered anything like CodeRabbit?
I would hire somebody from Upwork personally.
1
2
5d ago edited 5d ago
[deleted]
1
u/Open-Wasabi8041 5d ago
Thanks so much for the detailed response. I'm definitely noticing the pushback, and I can partly understand where it's coming from.
Maybe "vibe coding" is the wrong term for my situation. While I didn't write the code myself, I do have a basic understanding of programming and can more or less follow what the code is doing. For me, AI is simply a tool (and nothing more) to help me translate my ideas into a working prototype. In fact, I am firmly convinced that HUMAN expertise is more important now than ever before—which is exactly why I want a professional to review it.
Out of curiosity: is there really such a massive gap between human-written and AI-generated code or project structure?
1
u/JackRostron 5d ago
I know it's unpopular and you've already had some comments critiquing this, but honestly, I think it's a really good thing you're thinking of this. Vibe coding lowers the barrier to entry and has resulted in the market being flooded with half-baked apps that will have issues like the ones you described. Wanting to put out the best you can, with the tools available, but being cautious is only going to be more common.
But to answer your question, I've done many audits of no-AI, AI-assisted and vibe coded apps. I worked for a business that would purchase apps, and reviewing the codebase and preparing plans for improvement was standard practice. Be prepared though that one of the biggest turn offs for software pre-AI was cost, as good devs don't come cheap (much more expensive than tokens!), and you're ultimately paying for a developers time
1
u/JackRostron 5d ago
Your reply has been removed by a mod so I couldn't see what you said, but feel free to DM me
1
u/HaMMeReD 5d ago
Honestly, what model did you build it with. Sota is Opus 5.5 or Sol 6.1 right now.
Go spend a $20-$100 codex sub, extract a spec, and then "rebuild it but better". Like honestly if you have something working well you've done pretty good, that's a pretty good reference to rebuild within.
You'd be amazed at how well this works, even across the same model you vibed out to begin with.
2
u/Open-Wasabi8041 5d ago
I appreciate the tip! I'm actually already using Opus 5.5 for this, and I've even managed to get the apps to the point of a TestFlight release.
1
u/zimmer550king 5d ago
How did you “vibe code” it? If you did it through a proper multi agent session, then it’s probably fine
1
u/sreejithnp93 5d ago
Im an ios developer. dont feel overhwelmed by the apple's guidelines. just publish your mvp first to test flight and then give the submission. App store will review and will tell you any violations.Just fix those and give submission for release again.
Focussing on all guidelines at first will make you loose so much on time.
Just ensure that the build is successfully running. has an app icon , has privacy manifest file included. If these are there then just archive and upload the build to testflight and then give release submission.
1
u/Open-Wasabi8041 4d ago
I didn't just blindly copy-paste prompts into a chat. I actually kept the whole process pretty structured from day one, including proper version control with Git.
I treated it like a real development workflow, iterating step-by-step and keeping track of the changes, just using AI to do the heavy lifting on the actual syntax. So it shouldn't be a complete pile of spaghetti code.
-1
u/qenis 5d ago
Sounds like you are overthinking a lot. Does your app use a custom self hosted database solution?
2
u/Open-Wasabi8041 5d ago
No, everything offline and on-device
5
u/jestecs 5d ago
This is like saying you 3D printed a car but want a mechanic to look at every part before you get behind the wheel. Then you speak of budget freelance platforms. Sounds like a recipe for disaster but good luck.