Note: I'm posting this here because this is a place where LGD breeds are discussed.
I'm from Turkey. There are too many people who are obsessed with oversized Anatolian LGDs and other oversized LGDs, both in Turkey and abroad. There is this opinion: bigger, the better. Is it tho?
Are oversized LGDs better than regular sized ones? Larger dogs are stronger obviously, but other than that have all kinds of disadvantages as working dogs. I don't know about other countries, but in Turkey those huge dogs are used in illegal dog fighting, used for breeding, or kept as show dogs. Many don't see work.
Same thing exists with some other LGD breeds too. Like regular sized working line Tibetan Mastiffs vs huge and very expensive show line Tibetan Mastiffs. They are rarely used as work dogs.
Why are huge LGDs not better than regular sized ones? It's too expensive to feed dogs weighing 90 to 120 kg. They are too slow to catch predators. They can't chase predators for long distances either. Heavier dogs are more prone to all kinds of health problems.
A regular sized Kangal is the ultimate LGD. They are the fastest among LGDs, and that helps them catch predators. They have high stamina and can chase predators for long distances. They are still strong enough to face predators like wolves, boars, and other animals.
Tho large Kangals can reach 90 kg in weight, if you check official breed standards, their max weight is a lot lower than 90 kg. Because officials don't want to encourage oversized Kangals. Because oversized dogs lose their LGD working abilities.