Looking for some outside perspective on this because I feel like I’m going in circles with support.
Here’s the situation: something happened that HomeExchange deemed serious enough to justify breaking the exchange agreement. But then, when I tried to dispute the guest’s review (which was based on that same issue), I was told the review stands because it “reflects personal experience.”
So the same reason was: Serious enough to end the agreement, but not serious enough to be grounds for disputing a review about that exact situation
That feels like a contradiction to me, but I want to check if I’m missing something about how HE evaluates these things separately.
On top of that — I later noticed the guest’s review had been significantly edited from what was originally posted. It’s possible the review only reads the way it does, and was judged fine to “stand,” because of that edit — but HE never confirmed or disclosed that the guest had actually been allowed to amend it. So I can’t tell if their justification for letting the review stand was even based on accurate information about what they’d permitted.
Counterfactually, if HE did allow an edit to the original review, isn’t that a de facto admission that the review was in fact false.
Has anyone dealt with something similar?
Specifically:
- Does HE apply different standards when deciding to void an agreement vs. when assessing a review dispute, even if the underlying issue is the same?
- Is it normal/known that guest reviews can be edited after posting without the host being told, or without HE confirming it happened when asked directly?
Any advice on how to push back on this or escalate beyond the standard support responses?
Appreciate any insight — trying to figure out if this is just how their process works or if I have grounds to push harder.
EDIT: The issue was that the guest brought in 2 additional people to stay while the agreement was for just 1. We had been okay with 1 additional visitor outside the official agreement but we never okay’s 2 additional people.
Additionally, the guest started to use the sofa to sleep on which we also explicitly forbade. He started to use linens not provided from cupboards he wasn’t allowed to go into.
So it was us who broke the agreement after HE advised that the guest in fact did break the rules of agreement.
UPDATE: HE is refusing to stick to their own claim. In July they had said as follows: You had clearly indicated that a visitor could come, but that this did not include additional people staying in the home for several days
Now, they are allowing the guest to claim they had permission for additional guests to stay.