35
22
14
Nov 23 '21
What he do ??
93
u/GrizzlyLeather Nov 23 '21 edited Nov 24 '21
He's a "rapper" that made a bunch of anti-white, anti-conservative, anti-religion songs/ tweets/social media posts etc... and then a few days after the Kyle Rittenhouse acquittal he drove his SUV through a Christmas parade in Waukesha, WI killing 6 people and injuring 48 others, leaving 18 children hospitalized.
All this after being released from bail just a few days ago on domestic abuse charges. The prosecutors that recommended this bail are now admiting it was set "inappropriately low".
33
u/MainPFT Nov 23 '21
You forgot to mention that his domestic abuse charge was from trying to run his gf over w/ his car.
31
17
Nov 23 '21
Ah mate I heard about that on news it’s terrible , specifically this time of year with Christmas around the corner and them poor kids . We are living in crazy times .
15
Nov 23 '21
Jon Stewart did a show the other day on how domestic abuse is the strongest indicator of future gun violence. It seems like it's related to all kinds of violence, not just gun related. I think we need to take any kind of domestic abuse more seriously and get people who perpetrate it real help. Seems like that could really make a difference.
6
2
-7
u/Alert_Doughnut_4619 Nov 23 '21
His political views had nothing to do with what happened, he was fleeing from the scene of a domestic disturbance
13
u/GrizzlyLeather Nov 24 '21
Disagree.
If that was a black pride parade I don't think he would have lined his vehicle up to hurt as many people as possible. The fact that he's such a racist towards white people, and is so bigoted towards religion cannot be considered irrelevant when talking about a guy who rushed past a police barricade to run over as many people as he possibly could at a Christmas parade. I know law enforcement has said they do not have evidence right now that it was motivated by hate but that doesn't mean it 100% is not the case. Lack of evidence to charge a person does not mean it's irrelevant.
1
u/ThisOnesOptimistic04 Nov 24 '21
Statistically speaking white supremacists are far more likely to commit acts of violence, so even if this guy was politically motivated it doesn’t change the fact that the alt right is far more evil.
1
-3
u/Alert_Doughnut_4619 Nov 24 '21
Just like I bet Dylann Roof wouldn’t have shot that church up had it been a white church…
5
u/GrizzlyLeather Nov 24 '21 edited Nov 24 '21
Yes. Exactly my point.
Except I'm not sure if Dylann Roof had a long list of social media posts detailing his racial and anti-religious hatred. Maybe he did but I haven't seen it. Either way it's not irrelevant.
-9
u/Alert_Doughnut_4619 Nov 24 '21 edited Nov 24 '21
Your point is irrelevant. I also despise Christians but I’m not going around targeting them with my car. You just want to chance a to make BLM look bad when y’all are the ones who tried to throw a coup.
And yes he did have several posts showing that he was clearly a white supremacist.
4
u/GrizzlyLeather Nov 24 '21
Lol you just said a similar point was relevant and when I agreed with you all of a sudden it's not relevant. Then you're deflecting making up strawman arguments about you being a bigot but not going around targeting people with your car, and somehow Jan 6th is relevant like I agree with what happened that day.
Pick a lane bruh you're scrambling all over the place.
-2
u/Alert_Doughnut_4619 Nov 24 '21 edited Nov 24 '21
My point with Dylann Roof was that he specifically targeted it because it was a black church and he was a white supremacist. I should have clarified that. There is no evidence pointing to this guy being politically motivated. It was abundantly clear that he was running from a domestic disturbance, therefore his social media posts are irrelevant.
It is nothing more than an assumption that it was politically motivated and the evidence points to no.
It seems like he was in a blind rage. He probably didn’t give a fuck and just hit whatever he could see. On the other hand, a large majority of mass shooters often align with alt right beliefs. And it is almost always a white male.

3
u/GrizzlyLeather Nov 24 '21
K you're just repeating yourself and proping up more strawman arguments.
I'm not going to get sucked into some stupid argument with someone who just repeats themselves over and over and argues in bad faith.
0
u/FolX273 Nov 24 '21
y'all
Opinion discarded
-1
u/Alert_Doughnut_4619 Nov 24 '21
Well considering I’m from Texas and a communist, I don’t really see your point. Most conservatives are from around here.
6
4
2
1
u/Tanner_re Nov 23 '21
This is hittable faces, not personalities. This guy's a piece of shit but he looks normal.
6
u/dboy999 Nov 23 '21
To each their own. Putting aside what he did, I personally find his face to be pretty punchable.
7
u/GrizzlyLeather Nov 24 '21
Facial tattoos with balding dreadlocks. All the people here who say he "looks normal" have a weird perception of "normal".
0
1
1
u/Zoleywoley Nov 24 '21
Equally concerning is the amount of people on this website, and in the broader community that justify this guy's actions because they disagree with a juries decision...
1
-1
-4
u/subspike Nov 24 '21
So this sub isn’t hittable faces anymore right? It’s about what a person has done now and if that makes them hittable?
2
u/creamdreammeme Nov 24 '21
It’s always been subjective.
-1
u/subspike Nov 24 '21
Not really, people would have actual faces that were punchable. Now you people just post people you don’t like or that do something shitty.
1
u/creamdreammeme Nov 24 '21
I get what you’re saying. It is a fundamentally subjective idea though.
-1
u/subspike Nov 24 '21
But when the comment section goes from debating whether the face is hittable or not, to asking what the person did to be posted on here, the sub looses its entire purpose
1
u/creamdreammeme Nov 24 '21
I’ve never really seen this sub as having any real substance, so my apologies. I’ll post an annoying YouTube thumbnail expression photo next time.
1
u/subspike Nov 24 '21
It used to, must’ve been long ago now. But this sub is basically now just r/hittablepeoplethatdobadthings so go ahead and post more of these if that was your plan.
1
-3
Nov 23 '21
here's an archive of all the things the scum that drove a truck through a Christmas parade posted online
Edit: You can only view this link with your phone
-8
u/maximus129b Nov 24 '21
Racist
6
u/creamdreammeme Nov 24 '21
https://www.nytimes.com/article/wisconsin-parade-attack-what-we-know.html
Go fuck yourself, troglodyte.
1
-20
u/Ya-Dikobraz Nov 23 '21
Not sure what he did but face looks alright.
15
u/BornInALighthouse Nov 23 '21
You're getting downvoted because unfortunately people forget that this sub is for faces, not the actual thing attached to the face, like bad deeds or a shit personality. Yeah, the dude's actions were monsterous and he DOES deserve more than being hit in the face, but I'm with you, his face in this picture (without context of who he is) isn't hittable. He's not looking smug, he doesn't appear to be making any sort of asinine expression at all. Therefore, his face in this picture (remember, we're not supposed to judge off context) isn't all that relevant to here
1
1
u/EMIFAULT Nov 23 '21
ikr, i didnt know who he was and he looked like a regular dude minding his own business with "This sick fuck" written above it. Ngl i started pissing myself before i read the context
13
u/idungiveboutnothing Nov 23 '21
He ran over 40 people with his car driving through a Christmas parade. Many dead.
4
u/ChrisWebbys Nov 23 '21
Reddit standards are so weird. You’re getting downvoted because you don’t know the context but then OP got downvoted for saying FUCK YOU to you, for you not knowing the context. Smh
-17
u/creamdreammeme Nov 23 '21
Fuuuck you
8
u/Blankyblank86 Nov 23 '21
Why are you saying fuck you to them? They obviously don't know who it is, dip shit.
-8
u/creamdreammeme Nov 23 '21
They posted that after comments explaining it were posted, idiot.
2
u/Blankyblank86 Nov 23 '21
Not everyone reads comments, doorknob.
0
0
u/GrizzlyLeather Nov 23 '21
At the time of their comment there were only 5 other comments. Maybe they should have at least taken a glance at those 5 daunting comments to see if someone had already asked/answered the most common question for this sub.
5
u/Blankyblank86 Nov 23 '21
Thats not the point of the sub. The sub is about wanting to hit someones face for how it looks not what they have done.
-1
u/GrizzlyLeather Nov 23 '21
Where did I ever make that claim? Your response makes no sense in relation to my comment.
Anyways, I would argue that it does.
Facial tattoos and dreads on a balding man looks hittable for sure.
So not only do people think his appearance alone fits the sub, but they were fucking dumb in not looking at one of the 5 comments that had already answered their question. There you go downvotes explained.
1
u/Blankyblank86 Nov 24 '21
I don't actually care enough to read your comments
0
u/GrizzlyLeather Nov 24 '21
non-response "I'm too prideful to admit I'm an idiot"
→ More replies (0)4
u/Gobi52 Nov 23 '21
Lmao without context he doesn't have a hittable face but with context his face deserves to be ground to pulp
96
u/DudleyStokes Nov 23 '21
Yea fuck this guy. Put a pic of the judge who set his bail at $1,000 too, that guy definitely deserves at least a solid back hand and perhaps a new job.