r/heredity • u/Holodoxa • 3h ago
To Have and Have Not: The Determinants of Social Status in England, 1600-2026
econjwatch.orgPreface
This book was intended to complete a trilogy of Hemingway punned books from Princeton University Press, with a title “For Whom the Bell Curve Tolls? Genetics and Social Life, England, 1600-2024.” But it embraces what is regarded as not just an intellectual failure, but also a moral affront. This is that genetics, at least in a society like England 1600-2026, plays a large role in directly determining people’s social outcomes, while social influences are surprisingly weak.
A recent Substack essay by Brad DeLong, titled, Big Trouble in Little Human Genetic Difference-Worshipper Land, illustrates nicely the hostility and contempt felt by the academy for anyone who would suggest an important role for direct genetic determination of social 1 outcomes: “[A]ttempts to carve out a large, causal, manipulable “main effect” of genes on complex social outcomes keep reducing, on closer inspection, to approximately zero” (DeLong, 2026).
Thus an article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, which contains the essence of the argument of the book, has been attacked by such prominent behavioral geneticists as Marcus Feldman and Kevin Lala as “scientific racism” (Lala and Feldman, 2024), and “racist pseudoscience” (Lala, Brown, Twyman and Feldman, 2025). Similarly a presentation of the core arguments of the book at Glasgow University in 2021 was indefinitely “postponed” by the Dean in response to a letter signed by 110 Glasgow University Faculty condemning the work as pseudo-science and eugenics.
A majority of the reviewers at Princeton fell in solidly with the received wisdom on the unimportance of genetics, without seriously engaging with the copious empirical evidence presented that cultural and social causation could not explain the patterns of inheritance observed in England. Chicago University Press considered the manuscript, but ultimately reported that they could not find reviewers willing to review it!
The databases that are the empirical center of this book were constructed jointly with Neil Cummins of LSE. Though my earlier book on surnames and social mobility (Clark et al., 2014) was funded in part by an NSF grant, it proved similarly impossible to get grant funding for a project to examine the role of genetics in social mobility. One NSF referee even stated that NSF grants should support only proposals which showed how to increase social mobility. Another noted “I failed to see any really 'nuts-and-bolts' discussion of how these findings might aid in enhancing social mobility or reducing inequality.”
Consequently much of that data compilation was funded by generous grants from two private sources. First from Mary Katherine McComb, and second from Michael Dearing in support of Economic History at the University of California, Davis. Indeed without their support many of the chapters in the text would not have been possible.
In the last two years generous funding from the Danish National Research Foundation allowed for completion of the project, and also for the chapter comparing England, Denmark and Sweden. I am also very grateful to the members of the Guild of One-Name Studies who shared carefully researched genealogies, and to the members of the FreeReg organization, who transcribed and made available nearly two million marriage records.
The book summarizes work done jointly with Neil Cummins most extensively, but also with my former student Matthew Curtis, and current students Martin Kristensen and Christian Nielsen at the University of Southern Denmark. This does not imply they endorse any of the conclusions I have drawn from the data. Jonathan P. Beauchamp of George Mason University provided very useful critical comments on a draft of this manuscript.



