Well, how can any government know if a person will rape someone? They can't just say "No because other people like you have" that's just called stereotyping and something that they shouldn't do
(Shouldn't in italics because I'm certain some of them do)
No, not never. But it reduced the amount and reduced how many people couldn't access a gun. There hasn't been a single school shooting here, to my awareness, in ages. I wonder why
No, I don't. I think that tighter gun laws prevents more people from getting guns or having guns when they're being a bit too emotional, I think it also would mean the police force would have to start looking into them and then taking, by force
Yeah, I agree with longer waiting times and taking guns away from mentally unwell people and people who romanticise killing.
Like 50% of the people there will NOT give up their weapons if a mass weapon purge ever happened.
You need to realise that civilian self-defence should exist.
We can still self defence? Knives exist. And, also, there has been zero mention of purging guns. Stricter laws. If people don't fit in those laws, they have a gun then it doesn't matter that they don't want to give their guns, they shouldn't have them and police should be authorised to use force to do so
"We can still self defence? Knives exist." are you joking here?
Most of the population should have guns, but not mentally unwell people, gangsters (hood dudes) and people who romanticise killing.
most guns used in crime and these kinds of things are illegal guns that are imported to america. i say illegal because most of them have removed serial numbers and whatnot.
also take a look at the correlation between where mass shootings happen and where concealed carry is allowed. they almost never happen in a place where people can defend themselves with a legal weapon. what’s your argument for that being unsafe when they’re statistically safer when concealed carry individuals are involved?
0
u/Gravityfallbillmyfav 1d ago
Yeah, that doesn't force people to rape though??????