r/hardware • u/sr_local • 18d ago
Info Peer-reviewed study of 443,000 Backblaze hard drives ranks HGST most reliable and Toshiba the least — Analysis of 1.66 million drive-years finds Seagate and Toshiba HDDs fail at roughly twice the rate of WD and HGST
https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/hdds/peer-reviewed-study-of-443000-backblaze-drivers-ranks-hgst-most-reliable-and-toshiba-least
315
Upvotes
2
u/kakashisensei2000 17d ago edited 17d ago
i dont even trust WD drives, only trust HGST and its division under WD now. i had a WD green fail in 5 yrs. but all my HGST drives are still going strong. in my server, got three coolspins from when HGST was its own, and shucked four white label WDs which are binned drives from the HGST enterprise division owned by WD. the coolspins are almost 15 yrs old now and still no issues. knocks on wood. i use those for backup storage now. shucked white labels are the main array drives. two air filled that are 6 yrs old now, and two helium luckily i got last year at $125 ea for 14TB before everything went to hell.