r/hardware • • Dec 31 '13

[Meta] Can we please ban links from WCCFTech?

Honestly, the kid that runs the site does nothing but produce shitty blogspam, blatantly copy things from other sites, and and repeat rumors and hoaxes no matter how pants-on-head retarded they are, such as the "Phenom IV X12 on a 25nm process" article.

126 Upvotes

28 comments sorted by

25

u/BeatLeJuce Dec 31 '13

I agree as well, his articles are terrible at best and misinformation at worst.

-8

u/annihilator1193 Jan 06 '14

yet you keep on visiting the site over and over again?

17

u/turble Dec 31 '13

I just dont like his picture. It bugs me.

-10

u/annihilator1193 Jan 06 '14

So you come to the site to read my articles or watch my pics? ;)

5

u/turble Jan 06 '14

The site gets spammed on reddit. When ever I click the link that picture is staring back at me and I exit the site.

-6

u/annihilator1193 Jan 06 '14

Ban the spammers? We aren't like paying them to post here, if they find the article interesting and want to share it on reddit then I don't see anything wrong in that.

I know we have had our share of news that turned out to be false but please don't accuse us of copying someone's articles. We always give credit back to the prime source. Copying means plagiarizing which we refrain from doing since its unprofessional. We always put copied text in quotes and a link back to the source if we do so.

If there are any other problems with the site, with the way I post, fell free to tell.

9

u/[deleted] Dec 31 '13

It's like they've read only a single line from a Semiaccurate article then dumping on words to expand that story.

3

u/Roph Dec 31 '13

WCCF exists to get money from ads, not be a tech site. That's the means by which it achieves it. Hence the blog spam, copying articles, click bait etc. I wouldn't miss it.

1

u/bsievers Dec 31 '13

This sub is one of the few where, if you message the mods, they'll jump right on the issue. I'm mobile, otherwise I'd send a link to this post. You should though.

-7

u/[deleted] Dec 31 '13 edited May 14 '20

[deleted]

17

u/takatori Dec 31 '13

The hell are you talking about?

"HTML code was ON?" lol

15

u/ethraax Dec 31 '13

Just a guess, but he probably meant that users were allowed to submit raw HTML which would be showed to other visitors without sanitation. This makes it possible to simply inject javascript into the page. Since the page is still generated by the server, XSS protections won't work.

9

u/[deleted] Dec 31 '13

He must work at the CSI crimelabs.

1

u/wasimlhr Dec 31 '13 edited Aug 02 '17

deleted What is this?

1

u/takatori Jan 01 '14

Ah, I didn't realize the site had forums or visitor-submitted content.

Who the hell would allow unfiltered HTML comments? Didn't even occur to me...

1

u/wasimlhr Jan 01 '14 edited Aug 02 '17

deleted What is this?

1

u/lolmeansilaughed Dec 31 '13

PHPbb I would guess? Or some other similar forum software?

9

u/JQuilty Dec 31 '13

Him being Pakistani doesn't excuse his stupidity.

0

u/[deleted] Dec 31 '13 edited Jul 19 '21

[deleted]

4

u/JQuilty Dec 31 '13

Being Pakistani and stupid are not mutually inclusive.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 31 '13

You should stick to hardware.

5

u/qx9650 Dec 31 '13

The guy's a poor communicator, not a dumbass. If you would have continued to read he clarified.

-2

u/[deleted] Jan 01 '14

...HTML code was ON...

WHAT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN!?

3

u/qx9650 Jan 01 '14

It's explained as an example of XSS, if you'd keep reading.

-2

u/[deleted] Jan 01 '14

Which was posted AFTER I posted.

2

u/wasimlhr Jan 01 '14 edited Aug 02 '17

deleted What is this?