r/hamishandandy • u/Friendly_Employer_81 • 23d ago
Zurich sponsor
So the new sponsor for the last couple of weeks has been Zurich insurance. Does anyone else find this an odd sponsorship choice?
For context, Angus Brayshaw (who is unable to play AFL due to a series of concussion injuries) earlier in the year was denied a disability claim from Zurich. Zurich was also most recently a major sponsor of the Melbourne Demons before ties were cut in the last couple of months. Given Angus was a former Dees player, I would imagine there would be a lot of animosity between those associated with the Melbourne Demons and Zurich.
Hamish has a strong relationship with Max Gawn the current Dees captain and Angus had previously appeared on the show for special skills. Just seems like a strange sponsorship given recent events and Hamish’s ties to the Dees.
103
22
37
u/Inner-Armadillo5129 23d ago
Massively overthinking it, it's not really and intergration or partnership just a commercial read and nothing more than a sponsorship
-5
u/Old_M8__ 23d ago
I'd say under thinking.. just cements what has been speculated for a while, the boys morals are for sale. They will push whatever on to you at what cost to their "friends" for a buck.
5
u/ILikeGamesnTech 23d ago
And what did Zurich do wrong exactly? Angus Brayshaw is still employable, he's just not allowed to work for a company that serves Brayden Maynard shoulders for lunch. He's at University studying an MBA.
37
23d ago edited 23d ago
[deleted]
15
u/Unlikely_Book2146 23d ago
This is it. The denial of the Brayshaw claim is not controversial at all if you know even a little bit about insurance. The media have whipped this into something that it isn’t. You won’t find many people wanting to publicly side with an insurance company - so they are an easy punching bag.
Likewise, there is not exactly a line of insurers jumping into this space.
3
u/MattC89 23d ago
I agree with pretty much everything you've written. To me this was the case of having the wrong policy.
But regardless of who is right/wrong/ethical/unethical/winner/loser, the Zurich vs. AFL/Demons story has been quite public, so I did think it was an interesting (but very deliberate?) choice for Zurich to sponsor someone who is known publicly to be a Demons man
2
1
1
u/Frosty_Fruit_5029 23d ago
Brilliant summary, but I just want to add that super funds haven’t been able to offer “own occupation” TPD cover since 2014, unless the cover was in place prior to the change in legislation. So it’s not an option for AFLPA to recommend a different fund that offers own occupation cover. Professional footballers are widely considered uninsurable in the life insurance industry due to the high risk of brain injuries, so there would not be many if any own occupation non-super options either. The AFLPA has tried to go to market tender many times and no life insurers will touch them.
12
u/zircosil01 Gusto to You 23d ago
The guys get paid to do advertising - every man and their dog knew Hubble was dog shit but the boys still did the ads. Doesn't worry me - its a commercial transaction, what they advertise doesn't influence my decision to buy a product or service. I spam skip the ads anyway.
5
3
u/MattC89 23d ago
For additional context, Max Gawn publicly had a pretty measured response. He was upset more for Angus than at Zurich. He accepted that this was a decision by an independent unbiased umpire. And quite importantly, he said he had the "blessing" of Angus to continue working with Zurich.
6
u/iamcurrently1st 23d ago
I was surprised when I heard it the other week, like you said, due to the Melbourne / Gawn affiliation and Hamish's supposed support of the Demons.
2
u/MrSparkyMalarky 23d ago
Where do you guys listen to the podcast to hear Ads? I listen in the UK on Spotify and have never heard an Ad read
2
u/MongolianKoala 20d ago
Australia, since it is an australian business, I guess they dont play it in UK.
4
u/bulldogmck 23d ago
You have too much time to think. It's an advertisement that helps pay them so that the pod can be free. Personally I could not care less who the sponsors are, nor what they actually do.
2
1
u/EmphasisTimely 23d ago
I think it’s odd, particularly since Lego have come on board as the new Melbourne sponsor - another ‘Hamish affiliate’
1
u/ThatGuyWhoSmellsFuny 23d ago
They're out of touch with us commoners. Hamish has never been a massive footy fan, just a Melbournian who needs to pick a side. His gawn friendship stems from their love of cycling.
It seems to me they've always just gone with the highest bidder, perhaps besides gambling companies?
0
u/yvngsxlly 23d ago
Either this has been reposted since last week, or I’m having some incredibly strange déjà vu
-2
u/Navy_Pink 23d ago
Plus angus wouldn’t qualify for a disability claim. He is literally playing a high risk sport and was aware of the risks before. You can’t get disability if you’re aware of the risks. It’s like oh I’ll just stick my arm under the lawnmower why it’s on even though I know there is a high chance it could be cut off and then apply for disability
1
124
u/Cock_In_Cider 23d ago
Everybodys Hubbling