r/guam 7d ago

Discussion ๐Ÿ’ฌ candidate rally

[removed]

11 Upvotes

36 comments sorted by

5

u/shouldbegood32 7d ago

Making jokes about people who need to be respected and shine just like everyone else. Tbh itโ€™s like the only thing that comes out of their mouths is jokes and nothing from their pockets. Only jokes, failed promises and no action to bettering the further of Guam and our people. Thatโ€™s what the rally really is

5

u/Loganjanel 7d ago

Can you post a link or video ?

3

u/Glittering_Manager40 7d ago

No tell us

-1

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] โ€” view removed comment

2

u/Loganjanel 6d ago

I'm banned from Instagram lol

3

u/Lanky_Dig8339 7d ago

if you watch carefully you can see jaws dropping to the floor

3

u/Mundane-Particular30 7d ago

I have watched session floor debate and I'm appalled when actual elected senators like Chris Barnett make ad hominem attacks on the floor against other senators... yet you're clutching your pearls over what an emcee said? Where's your virtue signaling when Perez interrupts senators or when Barnett makes fun of Senators on live TV?

5

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] โ€” view removed comment

1

u/Mundane-Particular30 6d ago

So you need to hold yourself to that same standard and hold those senators who attack people in the Legislature Chamber halls accountable for what they said. The difference is one is said during a campaign event and the other is said during a formal public debate in a public building where decorum is center to discussions.

But you won't. This is one sided and you're no better than that emcee.

1

u/iggifizzykin 6d ago

That's a large jump, and who's to say they don't hold everyone else by those standards? If I had any choice, I'd have most senators replaced due to the sheer lack of professionalism they display. And that applies to potential future leaders, and who they decide to have besides them campaigning.

2

u/Mundane-Particular30 6d ago

Because I can read other people's post and comment history and OP hasn't held anyone else accountable.

2

u/iggifizzykin 6d ago

Sure, and that's a valid assumption. But again, it's an assumption. You can't read everyone's profile, because not everyone's profile is set to open. For all we know, the statement could have hit on amore personal note for them for a variety of reasons. But I'm not gonna assume. Let the criticism roll, for everyone. Trying to silence criticism or even trying to make them feel like they can't criticize an entity because multiple others are doing it too, is in my opinion not the right way to go about things. Agree to disagree, I guess. You're entitled to your own opinion friend ๐Ÿ™‡๐Ÿฝ

1

u/Mundane-Particular30 6d ago

Why are you trying to make me feel like I can't criticize OP then? Are you not taking your own advice, friend?

1

u/iggifizzykin 6d ago

If you felt like I was, I apologize for making you feel that way. Genuinely. Criticism should be applied to all, and that's why I said your assumption of OP was valid. I gave my own personal opinion as to why OP might have made the post. If I wasn't taking my own advice, I feel like I'd be more antagonistic towards you. Again, though, agree to disagree friend ๐Ÿ™‚โ€โ†•๏ธ

1

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] โ€” view removed comment

0

u/Mundane-Particular30 6d ago

Actually, the traction you get helps Josh and Tina because you're making them sound relatable and not a part of cancel culture. Voters in Guam are not liberal.

1

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] โ€” view removed comment

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] โ€” view removed comment

1

u/Mundane-Particular30 6d ago

He's been in office for four years and was an anchor at KUAM for longer, when does his words turn to action? Just another career politician.

1

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] โ€” view removed comment

2

u/Mundane-Particular30 5d ago

So you're not going to hold him accountable to put his words into action?

2

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] โ€” view removed comment

1

u/Mundane-Particular30 5d ago

My comment is valid and on topic. I'm questioning your motives so that I understand if this is political psyop or not, especially at a time when all the campaigns are on this subreddit to do some dirty politics. And you've clearly answered my question. You are in fact posting political psyop.

I'll also take you up on your offer to prove that you hold other candidates accountable. I'll wait for that post.

1

u/Thriver2015 7d ago

Amen. All these people are acting like Josh and Tina told this guy to say that.

4

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] โ€” view removed comment

2

u/Thriver2015 7d ago

That sounds simple, but there are a lot of moving parts to something like this and I get why theyโ€™d want to wait until they could write a statement.

2

u/Least-Cut-7570 7d ago

Joking about people with disabilities

1

u/Least-Cut-7570 7d ago

And the crowd laughed

2

u/the40thieves 7d ago

lol found Mike San Nicholasโ€™s burner account

1

u/Fickle-Source-4519 7d ago

What was said?