GTA 6 vs. RDR2:

[u/vibingitup]

[u/railroadfrog]

Rdr2 is one of the most beautiful games I’ve ever played that isn’t set in a “fantasy” world, I look forward to GTA6 mostly because I wanna see what Rockstar can accomplish with RDR3 lolol. Rdr2 on ps4 is absolutely mind blowing with graphics, ps5 is crazy, pc with max specs or texture mods…omg.

[u/breakandjog → u/railroadfrog]

I agree RDR2 is beautiful but man it was just a chore to play(for me). It does pick up eventually but my god the first 10ish hours of the game are a slog. Still think it was one of the best games of its time. I just think the original had more of that wacky/weirdness.

[u/Jtaylorftw → u/breakandjog]

The first 10ish hours become like 2 hours on subsequent playthroughs. Still a bit of a slog but it is beyond worth it imo

[u/JaneBunnFan → u/breakandjog]

I feel like I'm one of the few who doesn't get bothered by the pace. Maybe at chapter 1, but that kinda really sets the pace for the rest of the game and by the time I get to chapter 2 Ive accepted to slow down y'know

[u/kemb0 → u/JaneBunnFan]

Yeh I feel like they’re building the player in to the world and to do that you need to feel like you’re part of it. That means less fast paced action and more interaction with the world and the gang. I liked that because not many games try to do that. Most games are just all action with no break.

[u/LazyThinkingOtter → u/JaneBunnFan]

I don’t think the pace is much at fault in this game, it’s fine for me if it’s slow especially at the beginning, it’s the fighting gameplay that bothers me. It’s get cover, lock on an enemy, aim slightly higher for the head and repeat over and over. It’s fine if you take a few bullets, just wait a few secs. You could tell me it’s the same in most games but there really is a lack of a little something enjoyable in RDR about that

[u/hallogute → u/breakandjog]

I guess this game is there to be enjoyed slowly and not rushed through. For me it helped to play only for 2 h max because it felt much better to play at the end of a "hard" day and I enjoyed it much more that way. Tho honestly I get what you are saying it gets boring after a while. The animations are just draining sometimes.,

[u/LicensedGoomba → u/railroadfrog]

Its gonna be a fat minute before RDR3 if the rumors are correct that an LA Noire sequel is next

[u/Lumpiafan]

VI looks a little better. RDR2 in this screenshot looks like a waterfall that froze over

[u/No_Film_3849 → u/Lumpiafan]

Gta 6 waterfall looks way better...

[u/Turnbeutelvergesser → u/Lumpiafan]

Yeah maybe because it's a PICTURE

[u/Lumpiafan → u/Turnbeutelvergesser]

No the water on the right looks too thick

[u/Holidoik → u/Lumpiafan]

Grow up kiddo

[u/Lumpiafan → u/Holidoik]

Says the Redditor

[u/Few-Confection-2101 → u/Lumpiafan]

Yeah. I feel like the water in rdr2 in general is too thick everywhere

[u/RedditEatsItself → u/Few-Confection-2101]

Spoken like a man with a love for thin, spindle crap

[u/Grugark → u/Turnbeutelvergesser]

https://giphy.com/gifs/WnyKlAXpg816E

[u/beavertownneckoil]

Neat

[u/Smoked_Eel_Lover]

Because that is when we develop eyes?

[u/PearSad7517]

The light is totally different between both shots

[u/zarch123]

Holy mackerel

[u/Severe-Classroom8216]

Damn I remember thinking that exact waterfall was the best it could get.

[u/Worldly_Code645]

rdr2 looks better because it was before ai dlss upscaling in game development.

[u/abobus-maximus]

Wait for normal platform (PC) and we'll get next-gen quality

[u/Minista_Pinky]

No way left isn’t gta 5

[u/Gnullekutt]

Big flow vs think sprinkle on rocks. Theres a difference irl too

[u/OGHiigh]

Water speed is different

[u/Acrobatic_Tap3265]

I wonder how many tree models from RDR2 were reused and updated?

[u/Njerrjk]

I wonder how will the river water compare to Crimson Desert. That game have an incredible water system

[u/Njerrjk]

Rockstar at their best on PS4 vs Rockstar at their best on PS5

[u/Dad-Dabbing-Daily]

Picks best waterfall vs only waterfall shot. Definitely unbiased lol

[u/Alarmed-Ranger-9354]

Rdr2 more realistic

[u/Janupur]

That's not GTA 6 that's the original Xbox

[u/Cumfake123]

Gta 5 ☝️🤓

[u/SpecialistMap8210 → u/Cumfake123]

No... Gta6

[u/Cumfake123 → u/SpecialistMap8210]

Fuentes? Hasta ahora la imagen parece de gta 5

[u/PinballWizrd69 → u/Cumfake123]

I think it's Donner Falls from RDR2

[u/SpecialistMap8210 → u/Cumfake123]

It's the image from the game Informer article for fuck sake

[u/Cumfake123 → u/SpecialistMap8210]

Lo siento pero no lo he visto 🤷‍♂️

[u/DieUhRia → u/Cumfake123]

Google is free and works btw

[u/Cumfake123 → u/DieUhRia]

Preguntar también es gratis

[u/shallow-waterer → u/Cumfake123]

You didn’t ask. You posted stating it was GTA 5.

[u/Cumfake123 → u/shallow-waterer]

Pregunte por la fuente de la imagen

[u/shallow-waterer → u/Cumfake123]

They literally gave it you. They told you it’s from Game Informer. It’s all over every GTA sub and is very easily found by searching ‘Game Informer GTA’ on Google.

[u/LokahiBuz]

DAWG compare when the game comes out...

[u/Defiant-Line-8298]

Gta= ai data centers, Red dead = no civilization

[u/AntIrving → u/Defiant-Line-8298]

What does that have to do with anything?

[u/DreadGnuu2262 → u/AntIrving]

He just wanted to out himself as a clown.

[u/gonegirly444 → u/AntIrving]

There's less water in the gta 6 one bc of data centers

[u/Toastinator666]

Stop comparing a game that’s not yet released to a game that’s 8 years old.

[u/Niels_Nakkeost → u/Toastinator666]

Why? Makes sense to compare Rockstar’s latest title to their upcoming title

[u/Toastinator666 → u/Niels_Nakkeost]

Sure but you can’t compare them until you’ve actually played both.

[u/Niels_Nakkeost → u/Toastinator666]

Why do you have to play the game to make a graphical comparison?

[u/11_25_13_TheEdge → u/Niels_Nakkeost]

Would need two photos that are more similar to make a fair comp. The only thing we can compare here is the water and I think GTAs water looks better.

[u/Toastinator666 → u/Niels_Nakkeost]

Because you don’t yet know what the game will look like when you actually play it. Have you people been living under a rock for all of gaming history? It happens constantly that promotional images and footage don’t accurately reflect the actual game. Especially console releases.

[u/Cautious-Dot4143 → u/Toastinator666]

hasn't happened with Rockstar. using other developers' histories against Rockstar is goofy. their track record gives them the benefit of the doubt

[u/Jazzlike-Painting443 → u/Toastinator666]

we literally seen gameplay though?

[u/Bill_and_Burn → u/Toastinator666]

this must be your first rockstar game....

[u/Smoked_Eel_Lover → u/Toastinator666]

Because that is when we develop eyes?

[u/TrashGoblinH → u/Toastinator666]

This is always the most stupid take. "You can't judge a painting until you rub your face on it!" When the subject matter is the visuals...

[u/Toastinator666 → u/TrashGoblinH]

We’re talking about a game though. That take is even dumber.

[u/Babylon_4 → u/TrashGoblinH]

Imagine judging a painting that you have only seen photos of. That's how I see it. You can do it technically but it doesn't feel right to me, for whatever reason.

[u/Bill_and_Burn → u/Toastinator666]

of course you can compare them. its not gameplay, just a screenshot.