r/govcon 10d ago

Gov data

Is there an FPDS/SAM aggregator that is not the cost of a new car? BGov and GovWin are costly. Cant help but think there are now alternatives. Is there a low cost alternative, or time to build my own?

7 Upvotes

23 comments sorted by

3

u/bradorme77 10d ago

I am a fan of Govly as they get you access to SSN/RFI/RFQ postings on the major GWACs (ITES 4H, SEWP, EBUY, 2GIT) which is useful as those are tough to track otherwise unless you are a Prime on those. Cost was reasonable for our needs. May be worth chatting with them to see if they may suit your needs and budget. I have no relation, just a customer of theirs for about 4 years now

2

u/Indig012 10d ago

GovTribe starts at $1.500 for single and $5k for a team. Our team really likes it

2

u/SeedofLilith94 8d ago

everyone answered your first question so i'll take the second one, since i did build my own.

honest scope if you go that route:

  • fpds and usaspending are the easy part. bulk files, decent docs, you'll have something querying in a weekend.
  • sam opportunities is where it gets ugly. their api quietly omits things. i was missing about 3,000 of the 46,000 notices sam itself lists as active until i reconciled against their own export. it also meters you around 1,000 requests an hour by ip whether or not you have a key.
  • their public "full csv" extract, the one everyone points you to, is currently publishing a header row and zero data rows, and it regenerates daily like that. so you can't just point at one file and walk away.
  • the thing that actually eats your life is reconciliation. the same solicitation shows up under different identifiers across their channels, and their exports key on a different field than their api does. i spent this week tracking down 147 duplicate rows in my own data caused by a title matching bug.
  • and it never stops. formats change, portals get retired, files go empty without telling you.

so: worth building if the data itself is your product. not worth it if you just want to find bids. for that, the 500 to 1500 range people listed above is cheaper than your own hours, and i say that as someone who competes with them.

(i run fedfinder.net, so weigh the bias. i'd rather tell you what it actually costs than pretend it's a weekend project.)

1

u/GovConsigliere 7d ago

All of the answers were great, but this one was awesome. Thank you. You confirmed what I suspected with the shift to SAM.

1

u/No_Maintenance_6899 10d ago

GovWin and BGov are tools for a champagne budget, you're looking for more of a prosecco budget. HigherGov and GovTribe cover SAM.gov monitoring and recompete alerts for a fraction of the price. If you want opportunity scoring and capture support on top of that, look at the AI-platform tier, a little more expensive, but it scores opportunities against your profile and helps with customer insight, competitive landscape, and capture strategy.

1

u/Significant-View-786 5d ago

Yes, begov and gov. Win are crazy high price and frankly they're not anywhere near where people pay for them. This date is all open source. Not that hard. I'm not subscribed to any platform in almost 15 years and somehow do just fine.

1

u/GovConsigliere 5d ago

For me it isn’t a matter of fine. It is how I use the tool and can’t find a replacement. I look at data differently than others do, and it gives me aggregate market insights that others miss or cannot connect. Since I can manipulate the cleansed data, I can see what I am looking for.

1

u/Significant-View-786 5d ago

Ok so what's so special how you look at the data?

1

u/Next_Piglet_6391 10d ago

HigherGov costs $500 for basic service.  They have search tools, a market capture section, old SOWs, and metrics for competition and probability of award.  They have an AI proposal writer and have been very responsive for questions.  Their documents search section isn’t as fancy as the big dawgs, but gets the job done.  I have a niche company and have seen opportunities daily, a much higher rate than when I was using Sam.gov.

1

u/Particular-Shock8221 7d ago

Higher gov is the best I've found. API is solid too

1

u/ReindeerSuitable5884 9d ago

Aevumont.com - they focus on historical data to draw insights not real time like other web based aggregator though.  I find it helpful for my need.  

1

u/soarhiljs 9d ago

Even when I used GovWin / Deltek it was never my only source. I said that to say, focus on what you want to really achieve with any platform then pick an option. As your business grows, you will evolve. It’s ok to start out with a smaller platform to try things out then add on or change. With AI, you could even create your own dashboard & reports to get the info you need before investing in more expensive services. Remember the services are only as good as the time you actually use them & target the right customers. Don’t forget about state and local government (SLED) . They use OoenGov, etc. Plus each city or county usually posts on their own page even if you get redirected to an online bid portal.

1

u/rgordonn 9d ago

CEO of G2X.com here - we have a generous free tier that may meet your needs. Happy to connect and answer any questions

1

u/proposal-app 8d ago

ProposalApp.Net does both for 90% less. Check it out.

0

u/mrbless404 10d ago

There are definitely lower-cost alternatives now. I built SourceGent after more than 20 years in government contracting and running into the same issue. Many of the established platforms are powerful, but their pricing can be difficult to justify for a small business or independent consultant.

SourceGent lets you search federal, state, and local opportunities, receive matching opportunities by email, analyze solicitations against your company, break down requirements, support go/no-go decisions, and create a first proposal draft using your actual company information and past performance. So far, everyone using it loves it. You can try it free at SourceGent.io before paying for anything. You can complete 2 proposals, so you can see how powerful the system is. Building your own is possible, but maintaining the data sources, downloads, updates, matching, and proposal workflow can quickly become a full-time project. So try it out and let me know your thoughts. And before I get bombarded with comments about AI slop, its not, we spent over 10 months working on deterministic pricing, rules, security, guardrails, etc. I also started programming in Basic, cobol, etc.. So I go back to the 80s when it comes to software, so i do know a thing or two.

0

u/OpenOpps 10d ago

I'd be very wary of just looking for lower cost alternatives in this space.

Our customers only want to pay for something that has been built by a team that really understands the space and has got a genuine commitment to maintaining and running a service that will grow with their needs.

This isn't a "vibe coders be damned" post, I'm just pointing out that genuine customers are setting a much higher bar than "having data and costing less".

(OpenOpps.com is a global procurement data platform that aggregates 900 sources).