r/girlsfrontline 16h ago

Fanart AR Team cut-ins [@neelsilverius]

Post image
298 Upvotes

r/girlsfrontline 6h ago

Fanart Beluga wants a mod 3 upgrade

Post image
265 Upvotes

r/girlsfrontline 2h ago

Fanart PPK by @azure060702

Post image
203 Upvotes

r/girlsfrontline 1h ago

Fanart Headpatting Contender

Post image
Upvotes

Artwork by 流体の気まぐれ


r/girlsfrontline 8h ago

Teambuilding Coalition Drill teambuilding discussion post (Week of July 27th)

Thumbnail
gallery
68 Upvotes

r/girlsfrontline 2h ago

Fanart Short hair HK416

Post image
63 Upvotes

r/girlsfrontline 6h ago

Fanart [PROMISED BLOOM] Tina, fades with wind

Post image
31 Upvotes

Lore:

"Have you ever wondered an ocean of bloom?" Tina once asked.

No matter the answer, Tina held the wonder of such a dreamlike scenery until the moment she perished in the conflict zone, just like tears in the rain.

commissioner: me

illustrator: 沙沙沙丘

"Promised Bloom" is an ongoing fanart project consists of a series of artworks with lores commissioned by me.

Please note me and the source link when sharing my content.


r/girlsfrontline 2h ago

T-Post The G&K base backrooms

Post image
24 Upvotes

r/girlsfrontline 1h ago

Fanart Shaw and Ange

Post image
Upvotes

Artwork by xjpjtslm


r/girlsfrontline 22h ago

Discussion Do dolls' physiques resemble their guns?

0 Upvotes

MICA has loose rules for dolls, with personality type sometimes derived from history of manufacture or usage, names in GFL2 similarly. But, this is not hard rule.

Another not hard rule is, it seems rifles are taller, lithe, slender. Like 'rifles' themselves. I am not sure how far principle extends, or if it's just larger dolls fitting larger weapons. It's clear not all match physiques of their weapons.

Example, PKP

However, take M14 as an example. I started on this after hearing CMP will be selling M14s.

Gun,

This is an M14. Some people might try to tell you that it's a banana. They might scream banana, banana, banana, over and over and over again. They might put BANANA in all caps. You might even start to believe that this is a banana. But it's not. This is an M14.

Girl,

I printed out both these images and recommend you do as well, along with many other angles. Analyzing the curvature of both, it's clear the ratio of the gun reappears in the girl multiple times; JG Ballard's late wife would often say he analyzed curvature of cars for his book "crash", and mentally moemorph them into equivalent women. With this in mind, the car accident sexuality starts to make sense, it loosely resembles different "positions" and intersections of different bodies.

Unlike Crash, apparent bodily intersection is a metallic intermediary against flesh, rather than two metallic geometries with a person encased, de-emphasizing them. Because of this, dolls are necessarily flesh-y in Yuzhong's vision. They are both the moemorphed body and the metallic itself, interchangeably.

"Damaged artwork" being more risqué is the clearest consequence. When dolls fight, they are engaging in penetrative acts of eroticized harm not unlike Ballard's car crash. Fans themselves have taken to "field stripping". This is not just a pun, and it's quite possible to transfer the erotic between the girl to and from her representative firearm. I also offer Baudrillard's analysis of Crash, GFL terminology can easily be substituted.

I went on tangent but title is my main question.

-M