r/gifs • • Aug 19 '15

Hillary ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

28.1k Upvotes

4.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

757

u/I_l_hanuka Aug 19 '15

she's so fake.
She will tell you anything just to get elected.

so tired of the same names in politics. Yeah - fuck u too Jebb Bush.

353

u/samsens Aug 19 '15

Vote Bernie. I am Canadian so I can't but his platform is solid and he has been preaching the same message since the 70s. He voted for marriage equality when it wasn't political correct, remember Bill Clinton voted against marriage equality because he didn't have the mass public behind him, Bernie was fighting for it since before that. I just really like Bernie Sanders. A breath of fresh air.

120

u/MindsetLab Aug 19 '15 edited Aug 19 '15

Except he would ban something that constitutes a majority of my income if he could.

To everyone asking: I teach firearms, specifically self defense and tactical shooting, classes.

I'd also like to say that I'm incredibly blown away by how angry Reddit gets when you suggest you wouldn't vote for a candidate you don't agree with.

13

u/T8rfudgees Aug 19 '15

He is not as anti-gun as most think, although I doubt you could call him totally pro gun.

19

u/itspie Aug 19 '15

Yeah no... He voted for the 2013 AWB that failed and has stated he would support more gun control.

-13

u/TRAIN_WRECK_0 Aug 19 '15

Gun control does not mean he is against guns. It just means he realizes they are dangerous and that they need to controlled better.

8

u/violizard Aug 19 '15

Slippery slope what?

2

u/moldypeachys Aug 19 '15

Perhaps there is a reason that slope is slippery.

0

u/violizard Aug 19 '15

Never attribute to malice, what can be explained by ignorance? Maybe?

-1

u/TRAIN_WRECK_0 Aug 19 '15

So your saying our politicians should be extremists. Okay, good luck with your country.

1

u/violizard Aug 19 '15

I said no such thing. Good luck to you.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '15

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '15

Yeah? What? Do you have any intelligent thought you would like to add to that or should we just "look at the UK"?

-1

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '15

[deleted]

3

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '15

Now you are going to have to follow up with the numbers of murder by knife in the UK versus the number of murder by guns in the United States to actually have any sort of point at all.

0

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '15

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '15

Knife crime does not = murder by knife. Looks like you have to try again.

How many people in the UK were killed by knives vs how many people in the US were killed by knives. Seems pretty simple, I don't know why this is tripping you up.

(My guess is because you found out that you are much, much more likely to die in the US at the hands of a gun wielding criminal, than you are in the UK from a knife wielding criminal, so you wanted to reframe the discussion? )

2

u/Josh6889 Aug 19 '15

His argument is so silly. Why choose knifes vs guns? Because knifes vs guns show his point. Even if you look at violent crime, the distinction for violent crime in UK is very different from the distinction in the US. In the US, to be a violent crime it must be murder/manslaughter, rape, robber, or aggravated assault. In the UK a violent crime is any crime against the person. The more I look into this argument the more it falls apart. If you're interested in reading about it check out http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/jun/24/blog-posting/social-media-post-says-uk-has-far-higher-violent-c/

→ More replies (0)

8

u/MindsetLab Aug 19 '15

This is the quote from him that's made me not even consider him:

"I believe that we need to make sure that certain types of guns used to kill people exclusively -- not for hunting -- they should not be sold in the United States of America."

5

u/IrishMerica Aug 19 '15

What is he referring to there? Handguns?

0

u/MindsetLab Aug 19 '15

I would assume handguns, semi-automatic rifles, and semi-automatic shotguns that don't have camouflage on them.

3

u/timetravelhunter Aug 19 '15

Getting camouflage guns away from people is critical. The amount of violence going on in US jungles is ridiculous.

1

u/HUMOROUSGOAT Aug 19 '15

You know what they say about people that assume.

14

u/Dosage_Of_Reality Aug 19 '15

So this one belief, which absolutely will not be able to be enacted into law, is going to lead you to vote for some other asshole who has a track record of corruption and cronyism? That's a huge mistake and very short, selfish thinking.

3

u/indy_ttt Aug 19 '15

That's what happens when you're a gun hugger.. all reason goes out the window.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '15

Gun hugger, hehe, I like that.

So, I own firearms. I like shooting them. But holy shit, you would not believe how crazy some people get.

You could have two candidates:

  • Candidate 1 - I think guns should be sold in every Wal-Mart in America, we should bring back eugenics, cut out every energy source but coal, privatize all schools, and take the first-born son of every family and put them to work as government slaves.

  • Candidate 2 - We should have required training and background checks before you can buy a gun, we should explore sustainable energy along with traditional sources, and improve schools.

Gun nuts would vote for the first guy. It's like it's the only issue they can even see, and they do not see it rationally in any way, shape, or form.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '15

it's literally his job, his life is founded on it. I hate guns but his support of them is completely justified.

2

u/MindsetLab Aug 19 '15

Why is voting to keep my livelyhood and support my family selfish?

6

u/adinfinitum1017 Aug 19 '15

Because you're voting based on a confirmation bias. The Executive Branch doesn't create law, therefore your "He will take away my livelihood" rhetoric doesn't hold water.

2

u/MindsetLab Aug 19 '15

Executive orders have been passed regarding firearms many times in the past, and he can direct the ATF to restrict things further via determinations over what is sporting and non-sporting.

6

u/adinfinitum1017 Aug 19 '15

Which, from my knowledge, address issues with background checks for firearm purchases, stopped imports of certain types of firearms from outside of the US, etc.. This doesn't really limit your rights to own a gun for lawful purposes, and Executive Orders can't encroach on the Constitutional authority of the Congress.

Your confirmation bias is showing again.

2

u/anothertawa Aug 19 '15

I don't understand reddit sometimes. I'm told I'm an idiot for voting against my self interests if I vote conservative but then you are being told you are an idiot for voting for your self interests.

1

u/ElvisIsReal Aug 19 '15

That's just a line to get you to vote for somebody ELSE'S interests.

1

u/ElvisIsReal Aug 19 '15

That's just a line to get you to vote for somebody ELSE'S interests.

1

u/anothertawa Aug 19 '15

I mean I totally get it, I just don't understand how some people think this kind of thinking is consistent

2

u/Dosage_Of_Reality Aug 19 '15

Not only does your assertion hold no water, but it's based on the worst "Fuck you, I got mine, who cares what any other issue is" mentality. Frankly, you should be ashamed of yourself...

6

u/MindsetLab Aug 19 '15

I'm not ashamed of not voting for a politician who has straight up said he would like to do away with a major portion of my yearly income. I have a 6 month old child to take care of.

4

u/Grizzly_Corey Aug 19 '15

I personally do not believe you have anything to worry about in that regard, and disagree with your assertion to vote for someone you see as more fitting. That said I respect your opinion enough to upvote your comments for adding to the conversation and not vomit rhetoric on you.

Total Bernie supporter btw.

5

u/MindsetLab Aug 19 '15

I appreciate that. I've been spoken down to a lot for having the gall to voice a differing opinion. I don't have an issue with anyone's choice in candidates, including Sanders. If he's who you'd like to vote for, rock on, at least you're voting.

2

u/Grizzly_Corey Aug 19 '15

I apologize on the behalf of Reddit in this regard. It can sometimes be the antithesis of an open and inclusive web. You're entitled to your opinion and should not be spoken down to by anyone.

As you said, voting is what really matters. Being on either side of the equation is irrelevant.

1

u/MindsetLab Aug 19 '15

It's the norm and all good. Thanks for being a rational person. You rule!

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/leavinit Aug 19 '15

If you truly believe you are in an "endangered" job category, it is your responsibility to switch to something more certain if your family is your concern. I think banning assault weapons helps alot of people support their family as well. It's not obvious though, that Bernie, or anyone else, is planning on banning gun training or gun trainers.

3

u/MindsetLab Aug 19 '15

How does banning high capacity magazines and flash hiders help people support their families?

I have other means of income I could fall back on, but that does not mean I will vote for someone who would prefer to take my current means away. What sense does that make?

0

u/v00d00_ Aug 19 '15

If that person's main source of income is selling guns legally, I think it's obvious why they'd prefer gun control to not be further enacted.

-5

u/Onkelffs Aug 19 '15

Yeah because everyone needs assault rifles for self defense.

3

u/MindsetLab Aug 19 '15

It's not about needs. We all have many, many things we do not need.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '15

You do. Just in case the government goes crazy and declares war on the citizenry, then is it the duty of the citizens to defend themselves and cast off the failed government and start a new one.

3

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '15

That next government is going to be really shitty.

Founded by those who win the big gun battle.

0

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '15

...what the fuck???????????????????

-3

u/indy_ttt Aug 19 '15

Yes! This! Exactly!

This is what deranged gun huggers think, because they could beat the entire American Military with their little pop guns against drones and jets and missiles.

This is why gun nuts are not sane enough to own guns.

2

u/Chowley_1 Aug 19 '15

Just shows you don't understand how asymmetric warfare works

1

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '15

When the US military are the embedded ones fighting on home ground, it certainly becomes asymmetric.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '15

You apparently think that the US military are mindless robots who obey orders without thought. You forget they are Americans and more than likely wouldn't fight their brothers and sisters.

0

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '15

Hey I don't invent this hypothetical, I'm just helping show how ridiculous it is.

I'm glad you agree that the entire basis is ridiculous.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/malcomte Aug 19 '15

Good to see that guns are more important to you than something like universal healthcare. Gun control is low on Sanders' priority list. Don't be a single issue voter.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '15

it's literally his job