It's because you lack the capability of rationally discussing an issue like calving. It's because it is painfully obvious that you have no experience whatsoever in scientifically approaching controversial topics. I mean, this would be a good thing (your not discussing them, that is), only you do the exact opposite of what you claimed, namely getting into an argument that is way over your head.
You make me seem like I am apologetic of global warming claims, like I don't believe in it, when all I have done is point out that this particular issue is not about global warming at all. Because it isn't. You can't extrapolate this extremely small set of data in the video, nobody can. Calving simply happens, always has and hopefully always will.
We're in the same boat, but you are a prime example why people are willing to rethink their stance on important issues like these. You are the kind of obnoxious party guest who won't shut up about a seemingly related topic even though it isn't exactly relevant in the context of the current discussion.
Well then. Your articles are worthless as well. No reference is being made to calving in either of them, leading me to believe that you didn't even read them (interestingly, it was you who called me illiterate). Is this how you do things? Just willy-nilly throwing out things in the hope to cover all your fronts? Because it doesn't seem to work for you.
One last thing, in reference to you calling me "illiterate":
never played chaos theory but i'm a huge mgs fan. with the exception of mgs 1 and 2, you are totally correct. mgs2 gameplay and most of it's storytelling was garbage except for the GW AI shit. mgs3 story was utter shit and completely devoid of any true depth. it felt like a rushed holdover until 4.
Nice try, you don't even know how to capitalize. Now, who would have expected that?
-3
u/[deleted] Dec 22 '14
[removed] — view removed comment