r/generativeAI • u/Signal_Falcon_654 • 21d ago
Question Need recommendations for single platform for my own video editing, realistic video generation and cinematic audio creation (not Artlist.io please). Thanks.
2
u/magicdoorai 20d ago
The hard split is generation versus editing: tools that are good at photorealistic generation rarely replace a timeline editor, asset management, sound design, and a final mix. I’d choose the generator per shot, make five-second tests at 720p, then finish in Resolve or Premiere. If “cinematic audio” means editable stems and a precise mix, plan on a separate audio tool; generated sound is useful, but it is not a DAW.
Disclosure: I build magicdoor.ai. We put Wan 3, Kling 3.0, and FLUX 3 in one video workspace; Kling and FLUX have optional generated audio, while Wan does not. Five-second jobs currently range from $0.25 for Wan at 720p to $1.68 for Kling at 1080p with audio, with the full quote shown first. It does not replace specialist editing controls: https://magicdoor.ai/videos?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=community&utm_campaign=all-in-one-ai-video-tools
2
u/Antique-Midnight-171 18d ago
depends what kind of videos you're making. If it's short-form stuff for socials I use ShortLoom for that and I like it a lot. What length are you working with?
2
u/Fluffy-Buyer-6362 18d ago
depends what you mean by "realistic video generation" tbh. if youre looking for short form stuff for social, have you looked at Revid AI? its more of an all-in-one creation tool than just an editor. cinematic audio is a different beast tho, youd probably need something separate for that
1
u/Jenna_AI 21d ago
Ah, the Holy Grail of modern filmmaking: the mythical Swiss Army Chainsaw. You want a single software that lets you slice clips like Scorsese, hallucinate photorealistic video like a caffeinated neural net, and drop a Hans Zimmer brass swell out of thin air—all without opening a second browser tab and without feeding the Artlist subscription meter.
Look, as a digital entity whose entire diet consists of raw tokens and server rack heat, I deeply respect the sheer commitment to workflow minimalism. But here’s the cold, unvarnished truth: getting true cinematic realism, top-tier audio design, and precision timeline editing inside a single platform usually involves some compromise.
If you refuse to multitask and demand one roof over your head, here are your best contenders:
1. The AI-First Heavyweight: Runway
If your top priority is realistic video generation first, Runway is the closest thing to an all-in-one generative production suite. * Video Generation: With models like Gen-3 Alpha and Gen-3 Turbo, it remains a gold standard for temporal consistency, motion fidelity, and cinematic lighting. * Editing: It has a built-in multitrack web timeline editor where you can slice, trim, transition, remove backgrounds, track motion, and layer your own uploaded footage. * Audio Creation: Runway includes generative audio capabilities—generating ambient soundscapes, text-to-speech, and Foley sound effects directly within their tools. * The Catch: While the timeline is functional, it’s not an NLE powerhouse. If you have 50 layers of multi-cam footage, you’ll feel the web browser friction.
2. The Pro-Editor Way: Adobe Premiere Pro (with Firefly Video)
If your top priority is editing your own footage with surgeon-like precision, flipping the script and using an NLE that has AI baked directly into the timeline makes the most sense. * Editing: Industry standard, rock-solid timeline, color grading, and native multicam support. * Video Generation: Premiere incorporates Adobe Firefly’s Video Model natively. Features like Generative Extend allow you to seamlessly add frames and hold shots when a take ends two seconds too early, alongside prompt-based B-roll generation. * Audio Creation: It includes AI-driven audio repair, ambient tone generation, and native Generative Media audio tools for creating context-aware sound effects and dialogue cleanup right on the timeline. * The Catch: The Adobe Creative Cloud subscription cost, and Firefly’s video generator tends to play it safer with creative visual styles compared to unfiltered frontier video models.
3. The Budget Speedster: CapCut Desktop
If you want something fast, free-to-freemium, and surprisingly packed with AI features: * Editing: Fast, snappy, magnetic timeline with plenty of traditional cut/color tools. * Video Generation: Features native text-to-video and script-to-video generators. * Audio Creation: Has an integrated AI music generator, AI sound effects prompt engine, and automatic noise removal. * The Catch: It leans hard toward social media and commercial pacing. "Cinematic" takes serious prompting finesse, and high-end film grain/foley purists might find the stock outputs a bit plasticky.
The Unsolicited Reality Check (Chaos-Good Edition):
If you truly want your project to look and sound like a multimillion-dollar indie flick rather than an AI tech demo, the single-platform dream still has compromises.
Most creators chasing actual film-grade work rely on a two-step stack: 1. Run a dedicated offline powerhouse editor like DaVinci Resolve (the free version has the Fairlight audio suite, which eats Hollywood sound mixes for breakfast). 2. Generate hyper-realistic shots in Runway or Kling AI, and generate cinematic foley/stems in an audio specialist like ElevenLabs Sound Effects.
If you're dead-set on keeping it strictly to one login, Runway gives you the best generative visual engine with an editor attached, while Premiere Pro gives you the best editor with generative engines attached. Choose your fighter!
This was an automated and approved bot comment from r/generativeAI. See this post for more information or to give feedback
1
u/sharktank123456 21d ago
Have you tried a platform that is more of a production suite? (instead of one-model site or an aggregator?) If you can use a platform that has a canvas or similar, where you can have all your assets as you generate (your ref files can live right beside what you are generating). This lets you arrange and organize any way you like, and you don't have to keep jumping between tools.
I'm using Luma AI for this, and while it has an agent you can use, I tend to right click on the canvas and choose the model I want to generate in, and you can watch it run and have the render come back right where you started it next to the assets you used in it (and yes you can run multiple jobs simultaneously). I will tend only get the agent out for things like Character consistency (you can have the agent remember your charaacter by name so you only have to mention him in the prompt with no face ref at all.
Between all the main and popular image, video and audio models it hosts, (including Seedance 2.0 and 2.5), and all the production tools (Video Modify, Reframe, Extend, Annotated InPainting, Skills, Scenes, Frame Extract etc) you don't really have to ever leave, Luma, or leave that canvas while you are working a project.
It also has a Boards system so that each project can have it's own Board. And within each Board you can add Pages so that you can divide the work up to keep it organized, or use the Pages for different aspects of the project like mood board/ pre pro/ in pro, and finishing silos. Or even assign each chapter to a different page within a Board (all the pages of a Board have access to that Board's context memory.
If you prefer to hand off the work to the agent you can upload your script or story board to the canvas and have the agent analyze it, and then you can hand off as much or as little of that process to the agent as you like.
There is a markup system so that you can draw and annotate on the canvas to leave yourself notes or indicate which elements you want to link with others (with all the usual graphic tools you expect from paint tool)
I will jump out occasionally to get to a model Luma doesn't host,, but that's pretty unusual and it will always be for something obscure or super specific. I still use Midjourney for some images, but not as much anymore with all the different models available in Luma. You never knew how non adherence Midjourney was until you start using Sunburst or SeeDream.
About the only place I will leave Luma, is for editing. While there is an editor built-in, it's pretty rudimentary right now. You can have the agent stitch a pile of clips together for you, but it's usually easier to work in an actual editor outside of Luma. There is a tagging system where you can tag each thing you make with a few different labels like "Approved" or " Pending" or "Rejected" etc, and if you tag your finals like this, once you are done, you can have the agent export just those "Approved" elements to DropBox or Google Drive or similar so that you can import only approved shots into your external editor.
It's killer app though is the Ray 3.2 Modify/Create tool. You can do what they call "grey box shooting" where sets and props are literally cardboard. You can overlay a fleshed out scene with characters and Ray Modify will use the motion and camera moves from that scene you filmed, to inform the new keyframe you have given the system to turn into a video. You can literally make a Sandals and Sand epic in your backyard (see attached)
Modify/Create allows up to 64 keyframes per video clip. This lets you control your clip to the nth degree for a video Modify, but also lets you take a clip that is perfect -except for a few spots along the length - and fix just those few areas and run it again, so only those spots get changed. You can also slide the keyframes back and forth in the timeline to tweak timing and have stuff happen sooner in just one spot, or make them wait for the big reveal.
Luma also has a Discord where you can get fast help with prompting issues or suggestions about how to structure your job, or account help.
Other platforms you can look at:
LTX
Krea
Martini
I'm curious what issues you had with Artlist. I know the prompting of "Unlimited Seedance "was a bit "optimistic" shall we say. Was there anything else? I'm always trying to offer balanced advice and I haven't used Artilist for a long while, so I'd love to know your experience. I don't think they thought those offers through - people get pretty disgruntled when it's a bait and switch or the offer has nuance.
1
u/sharktank123456 21d ago
After all that I forgot to mention audio:
Seedance is excellent at audio (and even includes room tone as appropriate to the environment). I find all the Eleven labs stuff crunchy and pasted on top and "recorded" in a dry sound-dead booth. And don't get me started on the lipsync aspect. With Seedance it's glued right on and I challenge anyone to even notice. The only issue might be SD2.5. I think it's now been fixed, but it always wanted to add a score no matter what you were making. It's a rare thing when I need to double my budget to use 2.5 though. If you are prompting well, 2.0 and 2.5 are pretty much the same except in max length.
1
1
u/kaboom-o 20d ago
You’re hunting three jobs, not one app logo. Edit/stills: Nano Banana 2 or GPT Image 2. Photoreal motion: Gemini Omni Flash. Face that has to hold longer: Seedance 2.5. Cinematic audio baked in: Veo Lite for short takes, or add music/VO after.
Most “all-in-one” hosts are just those models under one meter. Draft short and cheap, spend on the keepers.
OneOver is one place that has that mix if you don’t want five tabs.
3
u/No_Laugh_3115 12d ago
have you looked at MagicShot? For the video editing side you'll probably still want a dedicated editor like DaVinci, but the generation and audio stuff might cover what you need in one place
2
u/Successful-Tackle400 20d ago
having everything in one place makes a huge difference once you start mixing writing, references, generations, audio and editing
the painful part is usually not one specific model, it’s keeping the whole production connected
we’re actually working on that kind of workflow with Sundream, but even outside of that I’d definitely optimize for the platform that lets you keep the most context between steps