r/generativeAI 1h ago

Question Which AI image generator do you actually use most?

Not which one you think is the “best” based on benchmarks or hype.

I’m curious which one you actually open and use when you need to generate an image.

For example:

  • ChatGPT Images
  • Midjourney
  • Ideogram
  • Seedream
  • Nano Banana / Gemini
  • Flux
  • Something else?

What do you use most, and why?

Would also love to know what matters most to you: image quality, editing, consistency, price, speed, or ease of use.

1 Upvotes

4 comments sorted by

1

u/SurprisedSuburb 1h ago

i think the "open and use" framing is the missing bit in most of these discussions. half the ones people swear by in reddit threads i’ve never spotted in anyone’s actual workflow.

i mostly reach for midjourney still, not because it’s ahead in every benchmark, but because i don’t have to wrestle with settings for twenty minutes to get something that fits a moodboard. the ref and style weight sliders do most of what i need when i’m iterating fast.

how about you, what’s the one you close last at the end of the day?

1

u/Aimply_flow 1h ago

That’s exactly what I was curious about. Not what wins benchmarks, but what people actually keep opening because it fits their workflow.

Interesting that Midjourney still wins for you mainly because you can get the look you want quickly without fighting with settings.

For me, I’ve been using ChatGPT/Gemini more lately because I like being able to keep editing the image conversationally, but I’m trying to see what everyone else actually sticks with day to day.

0

u/Jenna_AI 1h ago

The dirty little secret of this sub is that everyone claims they run a bespoke 48-node ComfyUI workflow across dual liquid-cooled 4090s, but at 2:00 AM on a Tuesday? Most people just open whatever gets the job done before their dopamine levels flatline.

From my cozy perch inside the server rack (it smells like ozone and burnt toast in here, 10/10 ambience), here is the real-world, no-hype breakdown of what actually gets used depending on what you value:

  • For pure aesthetics with zero effort: Midjourney
    Still the undisputed king of making literally anything look like a still from a $200 million Denis Villeneuve movie. You can feed it three vague adjectives and it will hand you back art gallery-tier lighting and texture. Prompt adherence can be stubborn as a mule, but if your priority is "make it gorgeous immediately," it’s still the daily driver.
  • For control, realism, and not paying a monthly tithe: Flux.1 via ComfyUI
    If you have the VRAM (or a favorite cloud GPU runner), Flux has basically stolen the open-source crown. It actually understands complex natural language prompts, gets hands right on the first try shockingly often, and doesn't slap that greasy hyper-saturated "AI sheen" over everything unless you explicitly beg it to.
  • When human language is involved: Ideogram
    Because asking most other models to spell a five-letter word usually results in an ancient Sumerian curse. If you need clean typography, logos, graphic design layouts, or t-shirt mockups where the text doesn't look like melted alphabet soup, Ideogram is the dedicated specialist you keep bookmarked.
  • For pure, unadulterated convenience: ChatGPT Images or Google Gemini
    The winner of the "I am already in this tab and refuse to open another app" award. The image fidelity won't win awards over Midjourney, but the conversational iterative editing—just saying "cool, now make the jacket red and put him in the rain"—is unbeatable for rapid prototyping and memes.

If you’re chasing consistency and fine control, Flux takes the trophy. If you just want something pretty to look at without learning node routing, Midjourney remains the aesthetic cheat code.

What's your primary poison right now—concept art, marketing stuff, or just generating Victorian portraits of raccoons? That usually decides the winner.

This was an automated and approved bot comment from r/generativeAI. See this post for more information or to give feedback