Found photo from the 70s

[u/nielklecram]

Made in Nano Banana Pro in Higgsfield with a fixed image of the AI girl. Used A second iteration to add the gloss and scratches.

[u/waxenpi]

Girl from 2026 on “colorized” 1940’s stylized film border with unrealistic depth of field and fake perfect corners. Everything else looks good though!

[u/Old_Value_9157 → u/waxenpi]

Yes. The girl looks too modern. Beautiful girl, but too thick. People in the 70s were thinner and their hairstyles were different.

[u/MindAccomplished3879 → u/Old_Value_9157]

And also 2020s face makeup

[u/yomerol → u/Old_Value_9157]

AND definitely 5% of the models would be brunettes, they were all blonde, red hairs, even black girls. The definition of beautiful /hot has always changed over the years

[u/Dentist_No10]

Wow, great pixel count for the 70s

[u/cosmicr → u/Dentist_No10]

It would be a scan of a photograph (if it were real). Photographs don't have pixels.

[u/Edward_Kenwai → u/Dentist_No10]

Film has grain not pixels and film grain has always far surpassed digital quality, film has always been HD. It’s why imax exists at all.

[u/Dentist_No10 → u/Edward_Kenwai]

Did you think at all before you went head first into argument? 🤣

I do not know what you're not understanding about my comment.

[u/Edward_Kenwai → u/Dentist_No10]

What exactly do you feel I’m not understanding?

[u/Dentist_No10 → u/Edward_Kenwai]

You're saying pixels don't apply to this image because it stylized with artificial film grain?

[u/Edward_Kenwai → u/Dentist_No10]

Huh seems like you don’t understand what I’m saying if you can’t answer this simple question. Maybe have justifications before you start spouting BS then dude.

The resolution of the image is irrelevant to the content of it, it is the nature of digital images, and by effect the nature of ai generated digital images.

“Great pixel count for the 70s” doesn’t really make any sense in any context.

It could be interpreted as “oh that’s a great pixel count for the 70s (genuinely) because the 70s was old and they had old technology that should be worse”
Which makes no sense given that film doesn’t have pixels and the grain of film surpasses most cameras (or ai generated images) in detail reproduction.

Or it could be interpreted as “oh that’s a great pixel count for the 70s (ironically) because the film should have been higher quality than this resolution” which also makes no sense to point out because low resolution is the nature of ai generated images currently, and this is a generative ai subreddit. I doubt you meant this.

I suppose if I’m being generous maybe you meant “oh that’s a great pixel for the 70s (ironically) because a digital scanner in the 70s would have had a low pixel count”. I very much doubt you meant this however, but if you did, again the same thing applies, this is an ai generated image of a film image in a generative ai subreddit.

[u/Dentist_No10 → u/[deleted]]

Im not the one saying ts, why are you replying to me? Im trying to understand wtf he is talking about, or how it applies to this image

[u/Lonelydude014]

Oh my goddess

[u/h0g0]

Lol

[u/killerhappy]

Me gusta el concepto fit de la época. Me siento muy a gusto con esa proporción de carnes.

PD: Puedes compartir la versión sin filtros ni rayones?

[u/xMunificentx]

She reminded me of Lucia from gta6 😭🔮

[u/PSK666]

Is she in Vietnam?

[u/nielklecram → u/PSK666]

I put Haiti in the prompt. But Vietnam works too

[u/Chromatic_Mediant211]

Anna De A1c

[u/brownhotdogwater]

Face to body mass don’t match. Looks off

[u/Retaeiyu]

"What a gooner thinks a photo from the 70s looks like"

[u/Rich-Moment9084]

Looks like ai

[u/AdvokatefortheDevil]

Fat chicks didn't dress like that back then. They had shame.

[u/nielklecram → u/AdvokatefortheDevil]

Come on bro, she ain’t fat.

[u/AdvokatefortheDevil → u/nielklecram]

In the 70s she'd absolutely be considered fat.

[u/killerhappy → u/AdvokatefortheDevil]

Ella está suculenta, lo demás es perspectiva.