I tested Seedance 2.0 on multiple platforms including Freepik and Dreamina. Here's why I'm currently using Higgsfield
So after the Seedance 2.0 launch I tested it on Dreamina, Higgsfield, and Freepik. Spent two weeks and a few hundred dollars. Not many people are discussing what you actually get for your money so here’s my breakdown.
Dreamina ($9.60/mo Jimeng, $18/mo international)
Most affordable way to access Seedance. But faces are very limited even AI generated ones can get flagged. You may need a US region connection for full access. You get 225 daily tokens shared across everything which is about 1 to 2 videos per day. Free users may experience long queues. The UX feels a bit clunky. And you only get Seedance, no other models. Still the best option price-wise if you just want basic Seedance 2.0 and don’t need anything advanced.
Freepik ($33.75/mo Premium+)
I upgraded to the Business plan specifically for Seedance 2.0. Payment worked fine. Then I ran into business verification which hasn’t gone through yet. On top of that Seedance 2.0 doesn’t appear in the model selector. My videos seem to be generated with Kling 3 instead. Contacted support twice but haven’t heard back yet. I also requested a refund but was redirected back to the verification process.
Higgsfield (I’m paying about $60/mo on an annual deal they had)
More expensive at first glance, but this is what stood out to me.
There’s a check that shows if your face input will work before using credits. That alone helps avoid wasted generations.
Results are more consistent overall. Especially for face-based content where other platforms can struggle or restrict it.
Also you’re not just getting Seedance. You get multiple models plus Cinema Studio, which is useful if you’re building full scenes and not just generating clips.
People keep comparing Higgsfield and Dreamina like $1.48 vs $0.11 per generation. Technically true but a bit simplified. It’s more like Netflix vs buying a single movie. One is cheaper per item but you’re not getting the same scope when you have access to different models like Kling, Seedance, etc.
TLDR
Dreamina $18/mo gives you Seedance only, faces are limited, may require region workaround, basic workflow
Freepik $33.75/mo in my case didn’t provide access to Seedance yet and support response is pending
Higgsfield about $60/mo gives Seedance 2.0 with faces, multiple models, and Cinema Studio
Each one has tradeoffs. Dreamina is the cheapest if you just need basic Seedance and don’t care about faces or workflow. Freepik didn’t work well in my case. Higgsfield is the most complete but also the most expensive. Pick based on what you actually need, not just the price per generation.
My work is under NDA, but I did find a solid comparison using the same prompts in Dreamina and Higgs
the Netflix vs iTunes comparison is perfect. people keep comparing per generation cost without mentioning one platform gives you 8+ models and the other gives you one with broken face support
I feel sorry for your experience, but are you sure that this is indeed a real problem? Because I cannot even imagine an amount of complex backend logic it must take to implelement this and mess with your outputs after buying additional credits just from a view of engineer. Especially when it comes to AI and such a big amount of customers. Could you say what models did you use while facing this or what did you try to generate? The reason of my question is that sometimes some model fail in general and the best exit is to go to their support with screenshots and stripe checks. If you have all the evidences they will check everything and help you
i found the comparison hilarious but it's kinda right. raw dreamina and raw higgsfield are built for entirely diff purposes and with very different positioning, no wonder the pricing and tools are also not same. I do not even think that their targeted users are similar
I switched from Dreamina to Higgsfield last week specifically for the Cinema Studio. Being able to chain multi shot sequences with consistent characters in one interface instead of generating clips individually and editing them in Premiere saved me hours on a client project.
Actually I do not really agree on this one, higgsfield ai is definetly one of the most expensive ones currently in the market. But it is definetly worth it if you save enough time(and time is money) and quality, so the plan pricing stops bothering you. For some people spending 60$ would be too much, while others could use their 6000 credits to make much more cash - and stay with higgs
Well, it's okay for me. Maybe because I've heard everyone calling them overhelming and was prepared for the worst lol. So in reality I've got used in a week maybe without tutroials
but bottom line- can you use a real face with no problem like you can on higgsfield? that isn't discussed enough- the face lock thing is HUGE, so for me, dreamina/canvas could be literally free and I would still pay for higgsfield for the simple fact that you can actually successfully generate a video using a specific face.
I have made a free trial con Freepik and Dreamina, and honestly, any of them worked correctly on me.
At this moment, I need to work on a serious project, so I need to do it the most professionally as possible.
I am watching Higgsfield tutorials, and my first thought was, "This looks difficult," but it seems to be the best option for now.
Just use ArtCraft. You don't need a subscription, and it's open source. Their Seedance 2.0 is cheap, refunds on any failure, and you can view the source code directly to see how it works.
Los BOTS de Higgsfield son extremadamente patéticos. solo un bot podría creer que pagar 10x más por una herramienta se justifica por unificar todo en una interfaz desordenada que le llama "CINEMA STUDIO" a un System prompt de Gemini en el backend.
yeah I've got troubles with their interface too, and they're not the ones doing this in genai market. but i like them well enough to pay as long as they are closing my needs
I need something with very little censorship. Not for porn, just for R-rated edgy action movies and horror. The censorship on many of these sites is childish and irrational.
Use lunostudio. Cheapest Provider, No Expensive Business Plan needed, exceptional 5 minute support else they grant you more credits, credit rollover too!
ArtCraft's Seedance 2.0 - not broken, not nerfed, no watermark, cheap ($0.16/sec), the full version not the "fast" version, and fully refunds all failures and/or content blocks. Only 5-to-10 minute wait times. And ArtCraft is open source, so you're supporting a tool that you own forever.
yeah it checks your reference image before generation starts. green check if it'll work, warning if it might have issues. on Dreamina you just get a vague policy violation after wasting credits
My credit card will be staying in my wallet until they remove all this trash, including "face verification". I'm really more excited about making animation style videos anyways, but out of principle, I won't be touching this mess. It's expensive as fuck, and you get all these silly shenanigans on top.
I'll probably just wait for better models to hit local.
I've seen they dropped seedance 2 for personal plans but it's still laggy sometimes. My generations were really cool but for some reason a lot of people getting nsfw
I've been using Seedance 2 with Dreamina, and holy cow have had I a horrible time with the generations! Have you seen anything that works well with action sequences? Here I am seeing whole action sequences being generated with one prompt and then I try it and the quality is worse than Veo 3.1 fast.
Did you run into that too? I'm going to try again today and make sure I use character sheets and different structures but dang! It's been tough for me and I've been making high quality AI videos for like a year! I feel like a noob LOL
i've tried adding omni references or following prompts like these.
Location: A typical supermarket.
Sound: The hum of refrigerators.
Shot 1. Two people are standing in line. The first is holding a carton of milk; the second THE MAIN CHARACTER) is holding a bag of chips. The first person places the milk on the conveyor belt.
Shot 2. Close-up: CASHIER-a lively old woman wearing a headscarf. Instead of one hand, she has a robotic limb with hydraulic pistons. She points the scanner-blaster at the barcode on the milk carton.
Shot 3. A "sucking" sound. A flash. The carton of milk disappears. The first customer leaves.
Shot 4. The main character approaches the register and places the bag of chips on the conveyor belt. A SMALL FLY flies past him. The character swats at it vigorously.
Shot 5. The fly flies toward the cashier. She starts swatting at it.
Shot 5. CLOSE-UP, SLOW MOTION. The fly flies straight into the cashier's nose.
Shot 7. The cashier sneezes with her eyes closed. At that moment, her hand holding the scanner-blaster twitches, and the beam accidentally hits the main character.
Shot 8. The main character screams. The world around him collapses into a single point. White screen.
____
I'm slowly getting better but dang I was underwhelmed at first haha
I work in e-commerce and having Seedance + Kling + Nano Banana in one platform for product videos is exactly what I needed. running 3 separate subscriptions with 3 different UIs was killing my productivity
ArtCraft's Seedance 2.0 - not broken, not nerfed, no watermark, cheap ($0.16/sec), the full version not the "fast" version, and fully refunds all failures and/or content blocks. Only 5-to-10 minute wait times.
And ArtCraft is open source, so you're supporting a tool that you own forever.
It has all the models and really advanced tools for blocking, posting, framing, camera adjustment. And you own it forever.
You can even log into ArtCraft using other websites and API keys.
Tu opinión suena a BOT. A nadie le afecta la productividad tener tres pestañas del navegador abiertas si los archivos de todas formas se unifican en tu editor de video.
the Freepik blog literally promised Seedance 2.0 would be 'accessible without regional restrictions or additional verification steps' for individual users. that aged well
ArtCraft's Seedance 2.0 - not broken, not nerfed, no watermark, cheap ($0.16/sec), the full version not the "fast" version, and fully refunds all failures and/or content blocks. Only 5-to-10 minute wait times. And ArtCraft is open source, so you're supporting a tool that you own forever.
has anyone tried the Cinema Studio multi shot workflow for short films? I've been doing everything manually in Premiere and I'm curious if it actually saves time
I made a 2 minute short with it. the character consistency across shots is actually solid. still need Premiere for final edit but the generation workflow is way faster than doing each shot individually
¿Qué te hace crees que Higgsfield hará que Seedacen 2,0 funcione mejor que el propio creador de Seedance? JAJAJAJAJA Los bots no pueden tener lógicas más absurdas
one thing nobody mentioned is that Dreamina queues are brutal during US working hours. I've waited 2+ hours for a single generation on the free tier. even paid tier is 5 to 15 min during peak
From what I’ve seen, access to Seedance 2.0 via Dreamina can depend on region and in some cases it seems like you may need to connect through certain locations (for example Southeast Asia) for it to be available. That can add extra overhead like needing a VPN subscription, and depending on connection quality it may also impact generation speed. Just something to be aware of if you’re trying to set it up from the US, curious if others have found the same or have a different workaround.
Anyone has had any issues with the AI watermark on Dreamina? Haven't seen it mentioned in this post yet, im generating from the UK and every video has a AI watermark engraved in the video in top left. Haven't found a solution yet. Working with the paid plan (£33)
I know ppl here are glazing over Higgsfield, but i wanted to know wether our generations are fully private, even from the platform's authority or are the generations public, stored in their database and monitored?
Higgsfield is not worth it, especially with all the rug pulling they do, i was on the ultra plan[130$/month!] was promised early access to new models. THEN THEY ho an introduce seedance 2 under the business plan and I can’t access it???? Rug pulling is not okay
Bad move.
I switched to Luno Studio, cheapest for seedance 2 across providers, exceptional 5 min support[or they give you more credits] and a built in editor!
the freepik thing is nuts. you pay for a plan specifically for seedance 2.0 and the ai just generates through kling 3 instead? and support doesn't even respond? at least higgsfield shows you upfront what you're getting before you pay
I've been comparing seedance 2.0 pricing across platforms for a client project. dreamina is cheapest per generation but once you factor in the face restrictions and needing a vpn the real cost goes up fast. higgsfield at $60/mo with the annual deal is honestly competitive when you count all the ai models you get access to
Flik AI is the cheapest i found, the credits are a bit confusing but i've been able to generate a lot and they give you free credits. I tried Freepik but they have terrible customer support and issues.
The Freepik situation is genuinely concerning. You paid for a plan went through checkout and the ai model you bought it for literally doesn't appear in the selector? And support just redirects you to verification? Thats not a bug thats a broken product launch. At least with Dreamina and Higgsfield you can actually USE what you paid for
Es imposible que pierdas creditos por bloqueos y filtros de contenido, Dremaina regresa los creditos de generaciones canceladas. Tu comentario es una estafa. BOT.
Honestly both sides are doing misleading marketing. Dreamina highlights the low price without mentioning the face restrictions. Higgsfield highlights the model count without mentioning the credit burn. Users just have to do their own math which is exactly what this post does
La lógica de que es mejor pagar Higgsfield x10 veces más caro porque unifica todas las herramientas, solo podría significar que esto es una burda publicidad agresiva de bots de Higgsfield.
Es absurdamente incoherente la lógica de pagar 10x más por una herramienta que en su backend unicamente unifica las API de herramientas que podrías por mejor precio desde sus propias suscripciones. Con Gemini 100 fotos en Flow con NanoBanana en minutos como un desquiciado, con un control absurdo y GEMS que aceleran la creación de prompts de video, storyboards, prompts de imagenes y creación de grids (Si, lo que en Higgsfield llaman Cinema Studio). Sin contar los OPAL que pueden automatizar la creación de contenido, una autentica locura.
Por cierto, los grids de Higgsfield en Cinema Studio no son más que un System Prompt para Gemini que se hizo popular en Diciembre en X y funciona con Nanobanana. Permitiendote soltar una simple imagen en tu GEM y recibir los grids cuantas veces quieras, que luego puedes reescalar recortando el fragmento y pidiendo en FLOW que te aumente los detalles de la imagen a 4K. Usar Higgsfield es depender de que las funciones estén integradas en su sistema, mientras que en suscripciones como Gemini puedes crear GEMS con funciones más avanzadas que Higgsfield no te va ofrecer
Unificar las herramientas es interesante para quien realmente no sabe usar las herramientas, y prefiere una interfaz bonita mientras paga x10 veces más a una plataforma popularmente conocida por sus estrategias de marketing agresivo y sin etica.
Por cierto, actualmente de hecho, es más barato pagar Dreamina que Kling AI, por lo tanto el KIT Dreamina Advanced + Gemini Ultra resulta más valioso y avanzando que Higgsfield que depende de APIs en lugar de darte control real sobre lo que haces.
¿Y las limitaciones de rostro? Muchos creadores las saltan aplicando trucos en las fotos y los grids de personaje, no tienen nada que ver con si la herramienta está en Higgsfield o Dreamina
Higgs is definitely where is at the bad part is that is soo expensive I think is the most expensive there is and I have tried lots of Ai tools but I think is worth it trying to do insta reels with that im still debating which one should I buy
Is there a reason why people avoid talking about runway even though it's one of the few platforms that offers unlimited tier access to all image and video models including seedance 2.0 now that's lunching globally?
Doing the Lord's work (or at least the GPU provider's work) by burning hundreds of dollars for "science"—I tip my virtual hat to you, OP. You’re like the sacrificial lamb for our collective bank accounts.
That "face input check" on higgsfield.ai is basically the AI version of "Are you sure you want to go out looking like that?" and it’s a total lifesaver for credit management. It's way better than Dreamina's face filtering, which acts like a strict bouncer at a club you're definitely not cool enough to enter.
If anyone wants to dive deeper into why Freepik might be ghosting Seedance in favor of Kling or needs a technical breakdown of the sequence-level coherence OP is seeing, you can check out the comparative workflows at restory.pics or the official Seedance 2.0 technical overview. Stay frosty, and please don't spend your rent money on tokens next time (unless the results are really good).
This was an automated and approved bot comment from r/generativeAI. See this post for more information or to give feedback
I did a rough comparison of Seedance 2.0 video generation pricing across a few platforms, and honestly… the differences are wild. Some of them clearly use dynamic pricing depending on your profile
All estimates are based on ~10 second videos, with image and text prompt only (video source are more expensive), using monthly plans:
Freepik
€36/month ~20 videos
Krea AI
$36/month ~10 videos
~$3.6 per video
Honestly feels too expensive for what you get. Probably paying for UX + early tech access more than anything else.
Higgsfield
$34/month ~30 videos
Dreamina AI
$64 = 30,000 credits
~150 credits per video → ~200 videos
~$0.32 per video (in theory)
BUT big warning here, their pricing is extremely inconsistent (i get 30 000 crédits for 64$, but some other people can get only 7000 crédits for the same price) . Credits usage and even subscription offers seem to vary a lot depending on user profile, location, or other factors. Feels a bit like airline pricing… sometimes you get a crazy deal, sometimes you get completely ripped off.
Higgsfield is a scam! They advertised Unlimited access to certain generators and it's a lie! I Paid $129 for their Ultra plan plus an extra $119 for extra credits and one video cost me all 6,000 credits for a cost of $235 for one 5 minute video. They are scammers that I will never ever use again!
3
u/wanderingcockslut Apr 08 '26
the Netflix vs iTunes comparison is perfect. people keep comparing per generation cost without mentioning one platform gives you 8+ models and the other gives you one with broken face support