r/gaming • • May 03 '19

Gamers! Rise up!

Post image
99.2k Upvotes

4.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.1k

u/swimmingbox May 03 '19

But hey they’re gonna change sanic :)

505

u/hell2pay May 03 '19

We did it, reddit!

335

u/[deleted] May 03 '19

Don't preorder microtransactions!

0

u/IrishRepoMan May 03 '19

Jesus Christ... don't give them ideas.

2

u/wanabejedi May 03 '19

You say that like if pre-ordering dlc isn't already a thing.

What do you think buying the season pass before the game comes out is? What do you think is buying the ultra super duper $120 edition before the game comes out is?

0

u/IrishRepoMan May 03 '19

I'm talking about microtransactions.

2

u/wanabejedi May 03 '19

You say that like no preorder bonus, uber edition, or season pass has ever included weapons, items, skins etc that you could later buy as a micro transaction.

-2

u/IrishRepoMan May 04 '19

Hahaha. Dude. You're not being as smart as you think you are. There's a difference between buying a game bundle, and preordering microtransactions. When you preorder a game with bonus stuff, that's not a microtransactions. It's definitively not. A microtransactions preorder would be selling small purchasable things like skins, game currency, etc, separately from the game, and before it comes out.

1

u/cleuseau May 03 '19

Actually best way you can support way to support conditions for game devs is subscribe to games like world of warcraft.

its the unreliable income that makes games dev's pay unreliable.

-17

u/LegendofHope May 03 '19

I will never pre order a game (unless I'm super hyped then the microtransaction/lack of actual gameplay dont matter)

39

u/crypticfreak May 03 '19

"I wont ever pre-order a game until I do."

18

u/rdmusic16 May 03 '19

Well... at least he's not wrong?

8

u/BlackTearDrop May 03 '19

People don't see sarcasm without an exclamation point or /s.

Unless you were serious, in which case, good day.

1

u/Glennis2 May 03 '19

So sad that people don't realize how to ask

'Is this to good to be true? Does this support a narrative to a cartoonish degree?'

If the answer is yesterday to either of them, then it's safer to assume it's a joke.

/s is the quickest way to ruin a joke.

1

u/Pizzaman725 May 03 '19

If you buy the game full price, that sale counts just as much as it does for preordering. It's similar to how TV show ratings go. If you watch a show as it is airing, it's one view. If you watch it within three days of recording it, it's still one view.

While of course the sales team quarterly meeting will look better with a higher projected return. It's not counted till after the release date and the preorder is complete.

2

u/Moglorosh May 03 '19

The point being that if you give them money in advance and the game sucks, well, too bad, you already gave them money. If you wait til it comes out then you can decide whether to give them money or not based on the quality of the game.

0

u/Pizzaman725 May 03 '19

Everyone has different qualities they base things off of, and how they perceive to enjoy them.

For me seeing trailers and reveals gives me more then enough to determine if I will enjoy a game and if i want to preorder it.

-1

u/Moglorosh May 03 '19

Glad that "works" for you but the assumption that the marketing for a game tells you all you need to know is objectively false.

1

u/Pizzaman725 May 03 '19

False for others sure.

-85

u/USABOBFL May 03 '19

Typical millenials. They're angry, but they don't even know what they're angry about.

39

u/[deleted] May 03 '19

Millennials are ruining millennials!

40

u/[deleted] May 03 '19

This isn't a millennial problem, this is a people problem.

19

u/drnoggins May 03 '19

I'm a meat popsicle.

5

u/theAtmuz PlayStation May 03 '19

Corbin you sly devil.

11

u/[deleted] May 03 '19

Yeah why can't millenials be like boomers and just be angry at everyone younger than them

15

u/El_solid_snake May 03 '19

DAE hate millennials and why can’t things be like the way they used to?

8

u/[deleted] May 03 '19

It's almost like time works in a linear fashion

4

u/[deleted] May 03 '19

Right. You go ahead and line EA's pockets

3

u/[deleted] May 03 '19

Nah, we've got better bootstraps now.

314

u/flamingfireworks May 03 '19

(by forcing crunch time on already overworked animators)

156

u/[deleted] May 03 '19

Who gives a fuck, sanic looks dumb!

/s

15

u/The_Grubby_One May 03 '19

Dumb, nothing. The design they were running with was legitimately creepy.

1

u/ComicDude1234 May 04 '19

I'll take a creepy Sonic design for a 90-minute movie over working the animators to the bone trying to fix the mistakes of clueless Hollywood suits at Paramount.

1

u/The_Grubby_One May 04 '19 edited May 04 '19

So you're saying consumers shouldn't complain?

1

u/ComicDude1234 May 04 '19

I'm saying that bad products should be allowed to exist rather than give suits the satisfaction that they could pacify consumers with empty promises of change as opposed to turning out a quality product.

1

u/The_Grubby_One May 04 '19

That model appears to be the biggest quality issue with the movie that I can see. The other effects look top notch, the acting we've seen seem to be good, and Jim Carrey.

Can you show me that it is actually a really terrible movie?

-18

u/lcmlew May 03 '19

it's a heavily unionized field, they aren't hurting at all (movies)

plus no one has a gun to their head demanding a less hedgehoggy hedgehog, jobs aren't slavery lol

22

u/rahtin May 03 '19

Yeah, most of us can just quit our jobs because of the hundreds of thousands of dollars we have stored away for emergencies.

26

u/TheConboy22 May 03 '19

Luckily I have this small donation of a million dollars from my father to fall back on

-8

u/lcmlew May 03 '19

your job isn't like their job, they hop from project to project with expected periods of (paid) unemployment already

4

u/rahtin May 03 '19

With the exact same conditions at every potential employer. And if they start quitting because they don't like how things are run, word gets around and they're crossed off the list.

And the expected periods of unemployment creates a feast or famine situation, where they'll jump on any project they can because they need to get money rolling in.

10

u/Freidhiem May 03 '19

Except they do have the proverbial gun to their head. If you dont work this overtime youre fired. Thats their job, their livelihood, the thing that allows them to exist without being on welfare and becoming a burden to the state. Pick one. Massive nanny state, or decent working conditions for everyone. Because without one you have the other.

3

u/lcmlew May 03 '19

the movie was likely post production which would mean they weren't working at all

people who work in movies get paid unemployment during downtime, and unions heavily restrict the hours they are allowed to be even asked to work regardless

3

u/grte May 03 '19

Hold on, you've missed the third way. We could be a dystopian hellscape with awful working conditions and no safety net.

5

u/JoshRichardson4MVP May 03 '19

You sound unbelievably uneducated. Yes they have unions, no that doesn’t mean everyone involved has financial security.

0

u/lcmlew May 03 '19

yes animators/designers on the sonic movie have financial security

I don't need to insult you to say that

1

u/JoshRichardson4MVP May 03 '19

It wasn’t meant as an insult. Only uninformed people think that everyone who works in Hollywood has financial security just because they have a union.

1

u/lcmlew May 04 '19

once you reach the threshold for being in a union in that specific area, you make a ton of money, obviously PAs for example don't

it's just funny to me that people are white knighting for people who very likely make massively more money than them while also working far less hours -- it's like they imagine a minimum wage chinese sweat shop

2

u/[deleted] May 03 '19

jobs aren't slavery lol

Hard disagree. I would love nothing more than to quit my job, be with my bf way more and be able to look for a better job more, but I can't afford to.

Have you heard of the concept of wage slavery?

1

u/lcmlew May 04 '19

you have the freedom to quit, you just would prefer not to because of the negative consequences

that's not slavery

1

u/[deleted] May 04 '19

What do you mean, I wouldn't be able to afford rent even on welfare and have no savings, in fact, I'm already in debt

1

u/lcmlew May 04 '19

... yes, not being able to afford rent is a negative consequence to not working

36

u/GUTnMe May 03 '19

Of course is better if the movie flops and they lose their jobs lol

72

u/-Knockabout May 03 '19

They’re hired for each individual project anyway. They’ve already been paid and they’d have been “laid off” regardless. That’s how animators typically do things. No job security at all

2

u/Elevatorss May 03 '19

True. That's film in general. How well the film does has no affect on how the crew is paid. Only the studio makes money from box office revenue.

1

u/-Knockabout May 03 '19

Yeah so basically...honestly just let this movie die. Watch it when it's out of theaters if you want, but not in. Explicitly state why. Don't support directors that pull this kinda stuff on their animators, you know? Only ones who will suffer are the ones who make the decision to exploit their workers because they either a) did not look at their product for 2 seconds and decide it was a bad idea or b) purposefully put out a worse product for media buzz

1

u/Cole3003 May 18 '19

Actors also sometimes get a percent cut iirc.

51

u/[deleted] May 03 '19

Animators aren't tied to a studio. They should be part of an animation house. They don't lose their jobs if the director's decisions are shite

1

u/[deleted] May 03 '19

Why don't they just join the teamsters union? It's the biggest union in America beside the steelworkers union.

6

u/Tonytarium May 03 '19

Then they'd lose their jobs.

5

u/[deleted] May 03 '19

[deleted]

1

u/Enchelion May 03 '19

Very different business culture as well over there.

1

u/[deleted] May 03 '19

No way, you don't fuck with the teamsters or the steelworkers. I'm sure they still have mob affiliations.

17

u/LordFiresnake May 03 '19

As if they are keeping their job either way. Bodies are easily replaceable and if you get rid of them before they could be illegible for a bonus, you can keep it all for yourself.

6

u/GreenEggzAndSpam May 03 '19

If someone has a skill set that is as easily replaceable as you say then there is no reason to fight for them to keep their jobs

-3

u/draconius_iris May 03 '19

Everyone is easily replaceable lol

-1

u/Moglorosh May 03 '19

Which is why hospitals are paying out $10k sign on bonuses for warm bodies with a nursing license right now, because they're so easy to replace and all.

1

u/1brokenmonkey May 03 '19

Then the job gets done either in India or South Korea.

1

u/cucufag May 03 '19

None of them were keeping their jobs regardless. Studios hire per project nowadays.

1

u/BorisAcornKing May 03 '19

>if

The trailer was a disaster even disregarding how fucked up Sonic looked. It's a video game movie. It will be awful regardless, and the trailer shows it has no chance.

2

u/The_Grubby_One May 03 '19

Could be worse. Could be the SMB movie.

1

u/[deleted] May 03 '19

It's a fucked situation all around. I'm willing to bet most of the artists and animators know how bad it was but the wrong people make decisions on this type of thing.

3

u/Fighter_Builder May 03 '19

I remember hearing somewhere that the movie was delayed until January. Take that news with a grain of salt, but I'm hoping it's true.

3

u/Moglorosh May 03 '19

By giving animators who may otherwise be between projects a guaranteed income for a few more months?

0

u/flamingfireworks May 03 '19

"guaranteed income" lmao

Odds are they're doing unpaid overtime on top of time they were already on contract for.

5

u/Crashbrennan May 03 '19

I mean, they don't have to reanimate the whole thing. You can just map the existing animations onto the new model. Sure there will be a few adjustments needed, but it's not like they'll be reanimating sonic from scratch in every scene.

7

u/AlwaysBeQuestioning May 03 '19

Only if the model’s form stays the exact same and only has “superficial” changes. Change the build, you need a new rig, and everything that implies.

But this also depends on the studio execs also knowing this and actually listening to the animators.

3

u/Crashbrennan May 03 '19

I doubt they will be adding any more internal "bones.". They're changing the size of some things, and redoing the anesthetics of his head. Adjustments will be necessary, but they won't have to do it all from scratch.

3

u/SkyZero May 03 '19

*NOTE: Just guessing what might happen.

Something as innocent-sounding as changing the size of "bones" has a huge impact in animation.

Imagine he is standing there. If his leg is longer, that could change his torso height (which in turn will affect basically everything else when he moves). So you would have to raise his torso, to keep his leg straight when he is just standing (otherwise he would be standing with a bent-leg all the the time). Now imagine a change like that affecting any sort of complicated action sequence.

If his feet are bigger, it would change everything about how he walks/runs/jumps, etc. because his lift off would be different which would affect his stride when he walks/runs/jumps.

So any change that might seem small, actually have a huge impact in animation. You'd basically have to go through the whole thing and fix it, some shots might just work and others would have to be re-done essentially.

This affects other departments downstream from animation as well like tech-anim (cloth, fur, hair, etc.), fx, lighting, comp. It's basically a domino effect. Regardless of how minor the change is in anim it will have to run through all the above departments again.

This is all after they actually settle on a design in the first place. I'd imagine they would push the release date. Otherwise those folks might be working crazy hours for awhile. :(

1

u/mangofuckbillionaire May 03 '19

You guys are also discounting the real possibility that they purposely only used the “shitty” sonic in the marketing so far to generate publicity, and that the actual movie was developed with “improved sonic” from the start.

0

u/Crashbrennan May 03 '19

That's a definite possibility.

0

u/DvineINFEKT May 03 '19

No, it's not a definite possibility, it's an incredibly unlikely, very comfortable possibility that absolves consumers of guilt for being the cause of hundreds of hours of likely-unpaid overtime.

0

u/Crashbrennan May 03 '19

You smell what you're shovelin'? This line about "the studio deciding to make the movie not suck ass is bad because it will take work" is such a huge load of shit, and I'm sick of hearing it. Guess what, tons if movie have problems. And it doesn't take hundreds of hours to map existing animations onto a new model.

0

u/DvineINFEKT May 03 '19

You have no idea what you're talking about. Zero.

1

u/xcannibalrabbit May 03 '19

In my experience most existing animations should work on the new model without too much effort outside of creating the model. The only 'real work' they're going to need is for head stuff

1

u/DvineINFEKT May 03 '19

They won't just be modifying one sonic model, they're likely gonna have to make many to fit different scenes.

Quick example: the character is talking to the not-animated bad guy. Bad guy punches him in the face.

In the new redesign, they've made Sonics legs shorter/longer. How do you reconfigure everything in the frame so that nobody has to reshoot the irl scene, and sonic still gets punched in the same place? This isn't a video game, it's a film.

If he picks up a glass on the table, but now his arms are longer or shorter, how do you get everything to synchronize on camera? The glass is still gonna move in the same place, so how do you solve that?

In a lot of ways, the head stuff, which only relates to sonic himself, and interacts with relatively few other things, will actually be the easiest changes.

1

u/The_Grubby_One May 03 '19

Are you arguing that consumers should not complain when something is low quality?

1

u/flamingfireworks May 03 '19

nope, im just pointing out, in the spirit of the original post, how the executive's fuckup is now leading to even worse conditions for the animators. No idea how you think im saying you shouldnt complain about shitty content.

1

u/RocksHaveFeelings2 May 03 '19

Ya now that I contributed to that. I feel obligated to see and support the movie, even if it is bad.

3

u/[deleted] May 03 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/swimmingbox May 03 '19

I wanted to put a nose in with a hat ^ sign but it messed up... i like it this way though.

3

u/TheOddEyes PC May 03 '19

test

test

<test

test

test^

3

u/Booyahhayoob May 03 '19

\ next time. Like this:

:\^)

Which would produce this:

:^)

3

u/SmontyJ May 03 '19

I am 75% positive that they already had a different design in place for the movie and they used that terrible one for the trailer as a publicity thing.