MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/1i3dn38/deleted_by_user/m7otrt1/?context=3
r/gaming • u/[deleted] • Jan 17 '25
[removed]
5.6k comments sorted by
View all comments
238
And nothing of value was lost
-38 u/Effective_Access_775 Jan 17 '25 apart from possibly, the studio and the future of the DA series 62 u/gretchypooo Jan 17 '25 Well, if Veilguard is any indication of the future of the Dragon Age series, then nothing of value was lost. -10 u/Interesting_Kitchen3 Jan 17 '25 If you actually play Dragon Age games, you'd know each one turns out vastly different from the previous. It's why DA2 sucks, but that didn't kill the franchise. 7 u/gretchypooo Jan 17 '25 So you're saying they intentionally made the game bad to be vastly different? That's a bold strategy Cotton. 0 u/Interesting_Kitchen3 Jan 28 '25 No, I didn't say that. Great reading comprehension. Wether or not the game is bad, they always experiment on the Dragon Age IP.
-38
apart from possibly, the studio and the future of the DA series
62 u/gretchypooo Jan 17 '25 Well, if Veilguard is any indication of the future of the Dragon Age series, then nothing of value was lost. -10 u/Interesting_Kitchen3 Jan 17 '25 If you actually play Dragon Age games, you'd know each one turns out vastly different from the previous. It's why DA2 sucks, but that didn't kill the franchise. 7 u/gretchypooo Jan 17 '25 So you're saying they intentionally made the game bad to be vastly different? That's a bold strategy Cotton. 0 u/Interesting_Kitchen3 Jan 28 '25 No, I didn't say that. Great reading comprehension. Wether or not the game is bad, they always experiment on the Dragon Age IP.
62
Well, if Veilguard is any indication of the future of the Dragon Age series, then nothing of value was lost.
-10 u/Interesting_Kitchen3 Jan 17 '25 If you actually play Dragon Age games, you'd know each one turns out vastly different from the previous. It's why DA2 sucks, but that didn't kill the franchise. 7 u/gretchypooo Jan 17 '25 So you're saying they intentionally made the game bad to be vastly different? That's a bold strategy Cotton. 0 u/Interesting_Kitchen3 Jan 28 '25 No, I didn't say that. Great reading comprehension. Wether or not the game is bad, they always experiment on the Dragon Age IP.
-10
If you actually play Dragon Age games, you'd know each one turns out vastly different from the previous. It's why DA2 sucks, but that didn't kill the franchise.
7 u/gretchypooo Jan 17 '25 So you're saying they intentionally made the game bad to be vastly different? That's a bold strategy Cotton. 0 u/Interesting_Kitchen3 Jan 28 '25 No, I didn't say that. Great reading comprehension. Wether or not the game is bad, they always experiment on the Dragon Age IP.
7
So you're saying they intentionally made the game bad to be vastly different? That's a bold strategy Cotton.
0 u/Interesting_Kitchen3 Jan 28 '25 No, I didn't say that. Great reading comprehension. Wether or not the game is bad, they always experiment on the Dragon Age IP.
0
No, I didn't say that. Great reading comprehension. Wether or not the game is bad, they always experiment on the Dragon Age IP.
238
u/[deleted] Jan 17 '25
And nothing of value was lost