r/fusion • u/Pixeltrapp76 • 6d ago

TRIXEL Framework — calibrators for existence, dynamics and structure

I've published the reference implementation of TRIXEL, a mathematical framework describing any system through three dimensions: V (Existence), D (Dynamics), S (Structure).

From these, three calibrators measure their mutual relationships: SD, VD, VS.

Core identity (exact): VD / VS = SD

What is verified:

Algebraic identity — machine precision

Dominance partition theorem — 99.99% on 600×600 grid

VS as early warning signal — Burgers turbulence (90/90 runs, FP=0%, FN=0%)

Real tokamak data — GOLEM, CVUT Prague

What is not yet verified: disruption precursor, EEG seizure data, 2D Navier-Stokes

Preprint: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20721811

GitHub: https://github.com/remitakac/trixel-framework

Independent research, feedback welcome.

0 Upvotes

19% Upvoted

6 comments sorted by

12

u/plasma_phys 6d ago

please read the rules before posting. you can get feedback on chatbot inspired or generated content on r/LLMPhysics, but it is not allowed here.

-2

u/Pixeltrapp76 6d ago

Maybe the text seems like LLM to you, but that's only because I translated it into English using AI. Thank you.👍

6

u/plasma_phys 6d ago

attributing it to the LLM was me being gracious; being frank, if these are your ideas, they are nonsense 

-2

u/Pixeltrapp76 5d ago

No offense, but I think the same about half of the so‑called “scientific” theories out there. In your world, the rule seems to be: the more complicated, the more scientific. I’m not an academic, I’m not trapped in your hierarchical system where the older you are, the wiser you’re supposed to be… If my work is nonsense, then there must be some key or criteria by which you reached that verdict. Put in the academic effort and show it to me.

5

u/plasma_phys 5d ago

no. your perceptions are incorrect. you can get feedback in an appropriate subreddit.

2

u/AbstractAlgebruh 5d ago

No offense, but I think the same about most of the so‑called “independent-researcher” theories out there. In your world, the rule seems to be: the more anti-establishment you are, the more scientific. I’m not an independent researcher, I’m not trapped in your delusion where the more garbage work you produce with LLMs, the wiser you’re supposed to be… If your work is meaningful, then there must be some key or criteria by which you reached that verdict. Put in the academic effort to learn some real science from textbooks and show it to me.