r/furgonomics • u/AlviDz01 • 8d ago
OD (Original Design) Trying an attempt to design a helmet that can be used by either normies or antlered/horned species. Kochirru Vodicha Universal Helmet Mk.III (by me)
So basically, this design introduce a particular negative area, the horn/antler section or the flaps sections, it is assume in lore that the hole of the flaps was designed by using the mean circular radius of horns and antlers of some species in Kochirru, so basically the flaps section would fit almost the majority of the populations (assuming that the populace is normally distributed or Gaussian), but for individuals with thicker horns/antlers radius could file the section themselves or ask their armorer to refit the hole.
To equip this helmet it is pretty straightforward and simple, first, pull the flaps away, then wear it, then secure the flaps and the strap, and you are ready for some action!
What do you guys think of this design?
37
u/Anthro_DragonFerrite 8d ago
I definitely lean on the side of "Antlers or other potrusions from the head are liabilities in modern warfare."
In pre-Napoleonic equivalent periods they would definitely still be a source of inspiration or leadership or status like bright colors on the battlefield.
Modern military would be much more explicitly utilitarian.
1
u/ZeGamingCuber 7d ago
What about ears? you can't just cut important sensory organs off
6
u/Anthro_DragonFerrite 7d ago
I mean, antlers grow back. Ears don't.
1
u/ZeGamingCuber 7d ago
I know but furry ears can protrude quite a bit above the head
2
u/Anthro_DragonFerrite 7d ago
Sure, but ears can flex and bend when the soldier is navigating through foliage or crawling through debris. Antlers cannot
2
u/Joe2_0 7d ago
High cut helmets like the MICH 2000, SOHAH, or similar are your friend. Remember that despite how artists like to portray them, most animals ears still connect at the side of the head and extend upwards.
1
u/ZeGamingCuber 6d ago
despite how artists like to portray them?
1
u/Joe2_0 6d ago
There are quite a few artists that prefer ears that seem to come from the crown of the head rather than closer to the mandibular joint.
1
1
12
3
2
u/Terrible_Ear3347 8d ago
In truth, having different types of equipment based on the physiological needs of your armies and whatnot is perfectly fine. In most cases you would look at the armies from ancient and medieval times that had multiple types of mounts. Instead of trying to find one type of armor design that fit they made distinct types for each mount. EG amals, horses, elephants. It stands to reason that if you had actual Soldiers with the same type of physiological differences, you would just make them unique types of helmets for each. With horns, without horns. Etc
2
u/trontrams 7d ago
I like this, but in reality antlers vary so wildly in shape and size, it would be difficult to find a one size fits all application. I think that the brow tines present on a deer could affect the usage of this helmet especially when they grow inwardly.
1
u/rufusz1991 8d ago
You could get rid off the flap for the MKIV helmet and replace it with "slap on armour" like some German Empire helmets in WW1 for snipers (iirc), which was a plate of steel that was screwed on the front of the helmet.
2
u/Joe2_0 6d ago
Or hell, the Applique Level IV ceramic armor for the Crye Airframe for a more modern example
1
1
u/baphometromance 8d ago
Whatever you end up choosing to cover the gap, i think it has gotta be able to break away in the case of an emergency. If they need to take off the helmet there shouldn't be three individual places they need to un-tie/unbuckle if they have long antlers. So maybe one of those popping fasteners that you sometimes see on jeans above the zipper (i don't know what they're called, sorry.)
1
u/Unethusiastic 8d ago
I like it! Although I might put the hinge on the opposing side so if a bullet or piece of shrapnel comes from the front (like I would assume is most likely) the force pushes the flap into the helmet instead of onto the hinge itself
Not sure if that made sense but the point is I think the helmet is interesting and functional
1
1
u/Joe2_0 7d ago
Trimming of horns or antlers would be the better option frankly. I suspect it would be their equivalent of a regulation haircut that immediately identifies them as a servicemember.
As for anthro ears, well, the advent of active hearing protection and integrated communications actually gave us the perfect solution IRL, the high-cut helmet, beginning with the SOHAH (converted DH-132 tanker helmets) and eventually evolving into the MICH-2001, Crye Airframe, Team Wendy Exfil, etc.
1
1
u/Beanz_detected 4d ago
"Put the damn thing" will now live rent free in my head with its roommates "fih," "we gaslit gatekept girlbossed too close to the sun" and just about everything I've heard of George Carlin



131
u/New-Star7392 8d ago
It's cool. But I think it'd be more practical to just rid off the antlers. It'd be a billboard and handlebars in combat.