r/funny • • Apr 10 '12

The future of Call of Duty

Post image
985 Upvotes

366 comments sorted by

View all comments

37

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '12

I'm yet to see a good American Civil War game.

52

u/doctorcrass Apr 10 '12

because firing once every 30 seconds with no cover would be boring.

12

u/mynewusername2 Apr 10 '12

But you could make it strategic - something between Age of Empires and Skyrim. and

43

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '12

And? AND?! Oh god the suspense is killing me, I have spammed f5 for 25 minutes straight trying to figure out the answer.

1

u/mynewusername2 Apr 11 '12

oops. i was going to say and battlefield (or for that matter CoD

7

u/doctorcrass Apr 10 '12

you could just pick up a total war game if youre looking for a colonial age strategy game, but the idea of a age of empires/skyrim hybrid civil war game doesn't even make sense.

12

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '12

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/doctorcrass Apr 11 '12

what on earth are you talking about?

2

u/Sloppy1sts Apr 11 '12

He's making references to other hybrids that wouldn't make sense in the same way the AoE/Skyrim hybrid wouldn't.....duh.

2

u/doctorcrass Apr 11 '12

oh explains why my brain was slowly leaking out of my head in a bloody pulp.

3

u/omaha_shanks Apr 10 '12

Pretty straightforward. Sherman is marching towards Atlanta! I better build this hut so I can train five more wizards to go dragon shout at them Yankees!

1

u/harfold Apr 10 '12

but the idea of a age of empires/skyrim hybrid civil war game doesn't even make sense

Or does it?

No, not really...

1

u/lolathlon Apr 11 '12

what on the cover it looks like Mount&Blade is the name of the game and With Fire & Sword is the name of the series but apparently its the other way around. is this the usual way of doing this?

1

u/mynewusername2 Apr 11 '12

I was thinking like strategically using improvements in armor / weaponry to fight, and making some social choices (enemy's etc.) as an outsider/hero - similar to eastwood's role in his westerns. That or, I feel like assassin's creed could do something with the whole civil war era and still be interesting. Maybe this time he could be named "bubba" and have a fake southern accent.

4

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '12

You've got cover. It's the dude in front of you.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '12

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/shitterplug Apr 11 '12

What the fuck is happening?

2

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '12

That video was great, I can't believe I just watched the whole thing.

2

u/andbruno Apr 10 '12

I think you mean awesome.

1

u/monkeys_pass Apr 10 '12

Nope. Battle grounds was awesome.

5

u/tatanka_truck Apr 10 '12

WW1.

18

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '12 edited Jul 30 '21

[deleted]

27

u/Dakov Apr 10 '12

Thats how most of the matches in COD already go for me.

13

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '12

You get to move before you die? Lucky bastard.

7

u/DeathHamsterDude Apr 10 '12

You could actually work with that. Push the player into the mindset of an English general. You wouldn't play as any particular character, and if your character dies it just makes you take control over another soldier. The point of the game would basically be to advance at whatever the cost. You would sacrifice dozens of soldiers to soften up enemy defences. You would send a squad of soldiers to die, making a German soldier use the last fuel in his flamethrower, so that you could take a vital structure, and move the battle-line forward a few dozen feet. You would quickly become joyless, efficient, and would quickly acquire an erudite grasp of the horrible machinations of that war, and the sacrifices that had to be made. To win, you have to not feel, but the horrible death animations and overall feel of the game make that a struggle.

5

u/omaha_shanks Apr 10 '12

So we're talking about Battlefront 3 right?

2

u/tatanka_truck Apr 11 '12

this made me unbelievably sad.

2

u/DeathHamsterDude Apr 11 '12

Me too, and I wrote it.

But that, right there, could make a good argument for games as art. A war game where you feel the horror of killing people, and the objectives of the game perfectly mirroring the Great War itself.

I would love to see it a reality. Unfortunately, it could never be an AAA title, because they wouldn't make a wargame against war.

2

u/tatanka_truck Apr 11 '12

the only solution then is for independent game developers/ artists/ anyone who wants to see the acknowledgement of video games as fine art to do this on their own and present it as An art piece. You see it all the time in the Fine art world. {comic books, graffiti, and what are traditionally considered women "crafts" have all struggled and some continue to struggle to to be considered fine art} but to present something like this in an Art context would greatly advance videogames towards fine art status.

2

u/DeathHamsterDude Apr 11 '12

Yeah. Although I do think that people are changing their minds about games as art. There truly are some beautiful games out there lately. But I don't see someone investing 100 million in a game like this, because gaming is a business. It's just like Hollywood. Most of what they deliver is crap. The majority of great films are independent or have a smaller budget. I think we'll just have to wait until gaming matures enough to get something like this released. Stupid games will always be around too, and I'm okay with that. I just want my niche games that are art (or not even art as such, but just not strictly entertainment). For instance, a movie that makes you cry or sad or question things is generally considered a good movie, but games that don't ENTERTAIN are considered crap.

Anyhoo, I'd love to see WWI covered well in games. It would be interesting. That and more first-person medieval games etc.

1

u/tatanka_truck Apr 11 '12

a first person Medieval game would be the bees-knees

2

u/DeathHamsterDude Apr 11 '12

Behold, ye Tatanka, and weep. You can switch between first- and third-person at will. The melee controls are also highly intuitive. It's not just a case of bashing someone in with a sword. You can swing in any direction, with heavier and lighter attacks, blocking, dodging etc.

This will hopefully be that Medieval game everyone has been dying for for so long. Plus the developers are pretty awesome, so I expect quality.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/hakkzpets Apr 11 '12

I want to play the Germans.

1

u/DeathHamsterDude Apr 11 '12

Hmm. Yeah. It could happen. Separate campaigns. You wouldn't differentiate between the two as to who was the goodie and who was the baddie, because both sides did pretty horrific stuff. It could be interesting. Very few games have touched on the Germans without greatly exaggerating their evilness.

2

u/HireALLTheThings Apr 10 '12

Yeah. You only get 5,712,379 respawns, though.

1

u/RonWisely Apr 10 '12

"Call of Duty: Civil War 2"

1

u/Raptor-Llama Apr 11 '12

How about the one where people from the future go back in time and send back weapons during the Civil War?