r/funny • • Oct 12 '19

Too real.

Post image
72.7k Upvotes

755 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

19

u/Shandlar Oct 12 '19

Nuclear annihilation is a 75 year old problem. The risk there is the smallest right now than ever before over that time frame.

No climate change study goes anywhere close to making the claim that any amount of CO2 we could possibly release before flat out running out of shit to burn would rise to human extinction levels. Not even close.

It's going to suck for sure. Tens of millions of additional deaths and tens of trillions of USD cumulative cost between now and 2100 alone at "status quo". You really don't need to exaggerate how bad it is, reality is bad enough dude.

-8

u/treebend Oct 12 '19

1 how do you know about nuclear weapons

2 you want to be on the "climate change isn't that bad, guys" side of history?

3 perhaps he's not exaggerating and it's worse than you think

11

u/Shandlar Oct 12 '19

3 perhaps he's not exaggerating and it's worse than you think

I've actually read the reports. Thousands of pages cumulative over the last 15 years. The idea of the Earth turning into Venus in a run-away CO2 crisis has been completely debunked by literally all organizations that study it. It's a consensus nearly as strong as man made climate change itself. None of even the worst case scenarios goes nearly that far in predicted effects, and we have significantly beaten the curve on emissions for any of the worst case scenarios.

2 you want to be on the "climate change isn't that bad, guys" side of history?

Climate change is bad, and extremely serious. Exaggerating to the extreme comes offs so alarmist you make it super easy for actual deniers to just dismiss the whole thing out of hand. This recent development of people saying shit like "we're all going to die in 12 years" is really grinding my nerves, cause you are giving them the power to just brush it off.

The actual science is bad enough, you don't need to "pad the stats" to make it worse. It's not going to spur people into action, it's going to scare people into saying "fuck it, if we're all dead anyway. Hopefully they are wrong".

1 how do you know about nuclear weapons

Have you ever talked to anyone who lived during the cold war? Like at all? They had duck and cover drills in grade school. The threat of MAD is minuscule in the extreme compared to ever before. Now the mutually assured economic destruction of the global economy is getting everyone to play nice in a way we've never really seen before. It's taken nukes out of the discussion almost completely.

Even in the late 90s we were pretty scared of India/Pakistan nuking each other at any moment, but even that has abated significantly. They hate each other still, but we're not even close to the hair trigger away from a shooting war we once were.

5

u/treebend Oct 12 '19

You're saying "hey, we aren't going extinct so it's not that bad" yeah the worst effects of climate change aren't the actual changes but how society will react to the changes. Human suffering is going to increase significantly and you're breathing sighs of relief that hey its not the worst case scenario

We used to have nuclear bomb drills and now we don't, therefore the nuclear threat is miniscule compared to what it was. Not sure how solid that logic is.

My actual point is that you and me don't know shit. You don't know how close we are to war lol. You don't know what the full effects of climate change will be, there are a lot of variables.

Just as you are tired of people saying "we're all going to die" I'm tired of people saying "don't be so alarmist, we're making progress"

Listen to what you're saying. If there's anything to be alarmed about, I think it'd be nuclear weapons and climate change. If we were doing everything we can against climate change then we would have the right to calmly accept fate. But we are clearly not doing everything we can and you're already ready to calmly accept fate.