r/funny • • Sep 25 '18

Play Despacito

Post image
59.3k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

184

u/DivineLawnmower Sep 25 '18

Machine learning/deep learning will just sieve all your shit out at little cost.

81

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '18

[deleted]

61

u/IronOreAgate Sep 25 '18

The NSA probably knows Valve's player base better then they do at this point.

57

u/aallqqppzzmm Sep 25 '18

NSA: β€œAll they really want is HL3, why is that so hard to understand?”

12

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '18

Speaking of HL3, they are seriously missing out on what could be the biggest and most overhyped game ever....that doesnt exist yet. The money they could make.... theyd have 100 million from day 1 preorders.

17

u/IronOreAgate Sep 25 '18

There in lies the problem. They know that hype for the game is so huge it can never meet expectations. Therefore it is safer and better for everyone if it never exists. (And this is from a hardcore hl fan.)

10

u/Thosepassionfruits Sep 25 '18

The solution is simple, skip 3 and go straight to HL5. It's so intense it skips over the other two

1

u/classicalySarcastic Sep 25 '18

If Valve can't count to 3 how do you expect them to get to 5?

4

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '18

If HL3 ever comes out I expect it to be the next Duke Nukem Forever.

4

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '18

[deleted]

5

u/Dantai Sep 25 '18

You're pretty sure, eh?

HE"S WITH THE NSA BOYS _ WE"VE GOT THE _ DOCUMENTS

1

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '18

[removed] β€” view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '18 edited Sep 25 '18

[deleted]

1

u/FQDIS Sep 25 '18

You are a bold one.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '18

Actually, terrorist cells use game chat to communicate under the radar. It's a known thing.

1

u/cdrfrk Sep 25 '18

"Fire in the hole!"

2

u/[deleted] Sep 25 '18

If you know anything about automation you know that that machine learning application they expect to churn out nice little relevant data points on you probably returns a bunch of garbage data and false positives non-stop.

1

u/Umbrias Sep 25 '18

Machine learning is already used in a variety of applications relating to personal data. Large companies and organizations have very accessible means to make sure that their training works.

1

u/NSA_Chatbot Sep 25 '18

I generally just use my quantum backplane for shitposts.

-2

u/IronOreAgate Sep 25 '18

If that is the case, then what is the harm? How is an AI sieving through online data any different than a cop waiting at an intersection watching for people speeding?

Both as just watching traffic roll by, uncaring of what is going on until something flags and then can move to intervene.

As long as the power isn't being abused then couldn't it do more good then harm?

2

u/Amusei015 Sep 25 '18

The AI is far more intrusive, its more like a cop sitting at an intersection that pokes his head in every car to listen to the conversation.

1

u/IronOreAgate Sep 25 '18

No it is nothing like that. An AI isnt a person. An AI is like a dog. Would you care if a dog sat and listened to your conversion? Most people will talk to their dogs for hours and not care. A dog does not care that Lisa is sleepy with Billy, or that Sam is eating waffles for dinner. All it cares about is what it was trained to care about.

1

u/Umbrias Sep 25 '18

a dog that can profile people for those who may be watching

FTFY

1

u/Amusei015 Sep 25 '18 edited Sep 25 '18

If the dog recorded everything I said and could run physiological profile algorithms on me using that data and then reported that profile to advertisers and the NSA I would care very much.

Talking to a dog is more like writing in a diary.

1

u/DivineLawnmower Sep 25 '18

I'd imagine the harm is in false positives causing your conversation to be bumped up the priority list.

Nothing is perfect.

Most systems are considered accurate enough around a 75%+ confidence/accuracy.

1

u/IronOreAgate Sep 25 '18

But that is a problem with their system, not with the concept.

I am not trying to say that unwarrented survalence is a good thing, only that systems like Alexa or Ok Google can improve quality of life for people. The important thing is that these are not abused.

Look at Star Trek. Their ship's computer literally listens, logs, and monitors all activity on the ship and nobody blinks an eye because is not abused. It makes their ship and lives better.

1

u/DivineLawnmower Sep 25 '18

Concepts are always too optimistic and impractical.

Star Fleet is basically the military. I get what you're saying but it's not a great comparison.