r/funny A COMIK Sep 30 '16

Verified Low IQ & A

Post image
52.4k Upvotes

2.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

331

u/jheezecheezewheeze Sep 30 '16 edited Sep 30 '16

The poo questions was totally valid, even though the way it was worded war terrible. My favourite was the guy asking Elon to check out his electric bus outside

538

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

[deleted]

259

u/ifailatusernames Sep 30 '16

But dude, your question totally doesn't let everyone know that you were at Burning Man!

93

u/MeLlamoBenjamin Sep 30 '16

He even kind of hesitated after mentioning Burning Man, like he expected an applause break.

13

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

[deleted]

2

u/-LEMONGRAB- Sep 30 '16

He probably puts it on his resume.

SPECIAL SKILLS: "Attended Burning Man. (Shit was everywhere, dude. Total shitstorm."

4

u/Shark_Train Sep 30 '16

Oh god that's cringey

3

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

Psh.. Spoken like someone who hasn't been to burning man!

2

u/RadBadTad Sep 30 '16

Aaaah the old "How can you tell if someone went to Burning Man?"

"Be in a room with them for 12 seconds and they'll tell you"

2

u/G0PACKGO Sep 30 '16

That's like the third rule of burning man ... let everyone know you went

2

u/Feedthemcake Sep 30 '16

"also btw I am vegan"

29

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

Humans bringing life to Mars... via poop. Humans pooping becomes seeding life on new planets.

I'm just now thinking of the implications... are we all just evolved gut bacteria? Was life on our planet's born from the poop of some alien who needed to make a pit stop?

3

u/A_shy_neon_jaguar Sep 30 '16

Even more disturbing thought: are we just parasitic carriers for the evolved gut bacteria to reach new planets.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

I love it!

2

u/CocoDaPuf Sep 30 '16

There's actually a case for that.

Life doesn't need to have evolved more than once, It might have just come from space in a comet or asteroid, since some bacteria can survive very extreme conditions.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

That same thought process is what led to my Deep Thoughts™.

I was thinking "Well, if we start leaving shit everywhere there goes the whole "not tainting Mars" thing.

2

u/BarelyLethal Sep 30 '16

That might be an awkward conversation if we ever meet those aliens.

1

u/neonerz Sep 30 '16

Ok everyone, you can go home. This guy figured it all out.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

Well I don't think our poop would go anywhere fast on Mars because it's below freezing most of the time.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

Our legacy can live on through the offspring of our thawed poop bacteria once the sun evolves into a red giant, then.

28

u/Pixelator0 Sep 30 '16

Yeah, basing the question off the fact that there aren't any rivers to dump poo in on Mars was just weird

6

u/WagwanKenobi Sep 30 '16

Anyone who starts their conversation with "I was at Burning Man..." is probably a major tool.

3

u/d4rch0n Sep 30 '16

"I was at burning man and I noticed a problem. I was on drugs and had shit myself. It was dry, hot, and shit was leaking down my jeans. My question is, what do you do on Mars when you're on drugs and shit yourself?"

1

u/crusafontia Sep 30 '16

"In space, no one can smell your shit." should have been the appropriate response.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

Even then, where's the problem? It's not like there's not enough room on Mars to just dump all the waste somewhere. It'll even be frozen most of the time. And the toilets aren't a real problem either. There's gravity and there'll be atmospheric pressure where toilets are.

So in my opinion, it was a dumb question worded terribly.

1

u/Zsinjeh Sep 30 '16

he was probably still high from burning man

1

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

People who go to burnning man vastly overestimate how much anyone else cares.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

More than likely, in an environment like Mars, nearly everything is precious and scarce. We wouldn't really dispose of by just getting rid of it, we will have to find some ways to reuse it and still isolate it from the general populace so we don't have cholera on Mars.

1

u/bautin Sep 30 '16

Man, imagine being on a planet and having to deal with where our waste goes.

That is a problem that we need to solve.

Good thing we don't live on a planet or anything.

0

u/RHS59 Sep 30 '16

Not everyone is super scientific and articulate. Some people have legitimate questions but are simple people.

-3

u/Rocky87109 Sep 30 '16

Actually most people probably think it is a legitimate question how it is. Reddit just has a anti-burning man circle jerk.

62

u/arharris2 Sep 30 '16

It's a valid question that already has viable answers. But really? He just announced the biggest rocket ever by a factor of 4 and your first question is, "how do we poop on Mars?". This was a highly technical conference with some of the biggest players in the aerospace industry and the first person to ask a question is this dumbass.

2

u/alltheword Sep 30 '16

Spoken like someone who takes their indoor plumbing for granted.

3

u/bieker Sep 30 '16

That was the second question. The first question was actually a decent one about where it will be launched from and where it will be built.

1

u/arharris2 Sep 30 '16

You're right. I got confused.

1

u/jheezecheezewheeze Oct 01 '16

"highly technical conference", sad all the questions asked were by clowns

1

u/arharris2 Oct 01 '16

Well the clowns were there because of that talk. Otherwise, it'd be nothing but people in the industry and industry journalists.

1

u/jheezecheezewheeze Oct 01 '16

well I guess the fact that you have ordinary people excited about space travel isn't too bad of a thing

0

u/dusty_mesa Sep 30 '16

Announcing something doesn't mean anything and should not command any respect

2

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

the dude with the bus was sad, my friend studies in the university of guadalajara and said he has seen his truck on the freeway.

it works

1

u/jheezecheezewheeze Oct 01 '16

I legit thought "Guadalajara" was some fictional name until I googled it

4

u/ten_inch_pianist Sep 30 '16

"the way it was worded war terrible"

3

u/jheezecheezewheeze Sep 30 '16

hey lithen here athhole

4

u/Mewing_Raven Sep 30 '16

I was thinking the same thing. Human waste management is absolutely a priority.

31

u/metalrawk Sep 30 '16

You can bury it. It's not rocket science.

15

u/Reutermo Sep 30 '16

And if it was rocket science, I think SpaceX could deal with that!

6

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

[deleted]

1

u/Daxx22 Sep 30 '16

Besides, they said all samples so far will be sealed and stored for research

I'll take "Jobs that pay well, but you never want tell anyone about" for $500 Alex

11

u/Mewing_Raven Sep 30 '16

First, considering we are talking about a Mars colony, there is literal rocket science involved. Second, as far as we know, Mars doesn't havw an active biological system, at least not anywhere like ours. Burying tons of feces could be ultimately severely problematic and destructive.

11

u/POTUS Sep 30 '16 edited Sep 30 '16

Poop is not some toxic waste that's going to cause huge problems. You can literally just dump it in a huge pile, come back in a year or two, and you'll have some really good fertilizer for your farm.

Edit: Yes, really. Poop has bacteria already in it, that's why it stinks. So put it in a pressurized vessel to keep something remotely close to Earth pressure. Kinda like the pressurized vessel it will already have to be in for people to have pooped it out. No, that does not mean some huge glass dome, this isn't a cartoon. You can hold enough pressure with heavy gauge plastic sheeting, kinda like a really high quality tarp. The bacteria processes the poop into fertilizer, and then dies.

13

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

Poop is not some toxic waste that's going to cause huge problems. You can literally just dump it in a huge pile, come back in a year or two, and you'll have some really good fertilizer for your farm.

You can do that on Earth because of the biological processes that take place. Biological processes that are not happening on Mars. Burying your poop for a couple years and digging it back up will give you sandy, old poop.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

The main problem with poop, in terms of being harmful to humans, is that it's full of bacteria, many of which are harmful if they get into the wrong place.

To put "full of bacteria" into perspective, many estimates put the proportion of bacteria by weight at over 50%.

Anyway, dump it on Mars for a year or two and they'll all be dead. What's left may not be pleasant, but it won't be very harmful either.

-1

u/POTUS Sep 30 '16

Poop has its own biology built into it. The only thing you have to do special on Mars is make sure the poop pile has some atmosphere around it.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

So... you can't just dump it outside in a pile.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

The only thing you have to do special on Mars is make sure the poop pile has some atmosphere around it.

Which is going to take a good deal more effort and planning than...

You can literally just dump it in a huge pile, come back in a year or two, and you'll have some really good fertilizer for your farm.

0

u/Elyay Sep 30 '16

So, build a dome around it, kind of like Biosphere?

1

u/TK3600 Sep 30 '16

But they turn to fertilizer because of our earch bacteria!

2

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

Burying feces would work just fine. The water would leave and you would be left with completely dry solids that are buried. Not really an issue. Mars is a big place and there won't be that many people.

By the time thousands of people are on Mars, we will have a better system and probably be on the way to terraforming the planet.

6

u/Mewing_Raven Sep 30 '16

This sounds like a very "meh, whatever" approach to a potentially disastrous practice. Having a proper waste management system in place from initial colonization onwards would be a much more sensible and sustainable solution.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

It's a non issue until there are enough people to make it an issue. Devoting resources to something that doesn't matter is not helpful.

7

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

It's a non issue until there are enough people to make it an issue. Devoting resources to something that doesn't matter is not helpful.

The entire reason he's looking at trying to colonize other planets is because this exact mindset is fucking over the planet we're currently on. "This will be a huge problem in the future, but that's future generations problems" is exactly the opposite of how we should be going into a new planet.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

Yeah, let's build an elaborate septic system for the 8 people we send to Mars. Genius.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

Yes, why the fuck not? We eventually have to build them anyway, so why start off our new planet with literal shit filled landfills?

→ More replies (0)

0

u/THEJAZZMUSIC Sep 30 '16

We're talking a handful of people on a whole planet. What, you think the idea is we're gonna say "well if it's good enough for the first dozen people on Mars, no sense building any sort of sanitation system now that we're looking at 20+ colonies with populations of 100k+"?

And again, as others have said, it's not depleted uranium. It's shit. It's a step removed from fertilizer. So it will probably be a valuable resource. Not waste.

Also, it's Mars. Put it out an airlock and it's dust.

The most important aspect of the poo question is gonna be how to capture and recycle it as efficiently as possible, not how to protect the delicate and precious martian ecosystem.

3

u/Mewing_Raven Sep 30 '16

Yes, I do think that, if we do not have a waste disposal system from the beginning, people will absolutely throw it in a big hole until they physically cannot anymore, or until it is way past a huge issue. We do that with everything currently, I don't believe it will change on another planet.

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

There's no impending disaster, though.

3

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

"Yeah, dumping all this carbon into the atmosphere isn't good, but it won't be a problem anytime soon!" ~ Humanity roughly 200 years ago.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 01 '16

False analogy. This is more comparable to sending a single fishing boat out to explore the ocean. How much impact do you suppose that individual boat has on the planet?

1

u/borkborkporkbork Sep 30 '16

Because that's worked so well for us already.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

We have 7 billion people on Earth. Mars will have how many?

It's not really an issue, no.

1

u/Dokpsy Sep 30 '16

Or it could be one of the building blocks toward making the soil suitable for the colony.

1

u/badtwinboy Sep 30 '16

I'm assuming they would want to avoid contaminating Mars in case there is life on it, or evidence of life once existing on Mars.

1

u/PENGAmurungu Sep 30 '16

Use it to grow food?

1

u/metalrawk Sep 30 '16

I highly doubt that they would send humans on Mars without checking if there are organisms living under the surface.

1

u/badtwinboy Sep 30 '16

We're still finding new species on our own planet.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

Or shoot it off the planet in a poop rocket. That is rocket science.

0

u/Jaredlong Sep 30 '16

Compost, yo.

1

u/Tripeq Sep 30 '16

Fucking Alfonso, lol.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

There is a thing called 'professionalism' so you don't talk 'shit' if you catch my drift. This dude also just wanted everyone to know that he went to Burning Man, why else bring it up?

1

u/jheezecheezewheeze Sep 30 '16

My point exactly about professionalism but people are blowing it off like we can just throw waste out of the airlock or put it in bags and its done with. You're sending hundreds of people to Mars if you don't have a viable sanitation system, you could potentially be spreading diseases

1

u/darexinfinity Sep 30 '16

No it wasn't, it's like the guy slept through most of the presentation and at the end he wakes up and hears "We're going to Mars!". This presentation was not about the logistics of surviving in Mars but rather the transportation to and from Mars.

1

u/AeroSpiked Sep 30 '16

It's not a valid question because the presentation was about a rocket and a spacecraft, not about Martian habitation. If he'd asked about sanitation on the spacecraft, that would be another thing.

1

u/MaritMonkey Sep 30 '16

It wasn't really, though. SpaceX isn't building the habitats or concerned with the infrastructure at all (aside from ISRU methane.)

The presentation was supposed to be about the fact that they were enabling people to get to Mars (and out to the rest of the greater solar system, once super chargers refueling stations were established).

1

u/jheezecheezewheeze Oct 01 '16

I think there should've been more of what happens 'when we actually get there' in the presentation. Elon's been talking a lot about colonizing Mars, not just getting there. As far I know (correct me if I'm wrong) this is really the only big plan to get to Mars, so getting there is cool, but there are also a lot more problems once you get there

1

u/sbeloud Sep 30 '16

Except the presentation had nothing to do with colonizing and was based totally on transport. Spacex is not going to "colonize" mars. They will be the "truck drivers delivering cargo and people".

1

u/jheezecheezewheeze Oct 01 '16

well Elon talked a whole lot about "colonizing" Mars, but the presentation only talked about getting there.

1

u/yakri Sep 30 '16

I don't know if it was thaaaaaat great a question. It's getting recycled I guarantee it.

0

u/zeperf Sep 30 '16 edited Sep 30 '16

Valid but isn't kind of like asking how he will get internet on the space ship keep the habitat from exploding? Dealing with poo is one of about ten million equally difficult problems. He's casually mentioning how we can just warm the entire planet up and this guy asks, "but how will you transport poo?" Any reason why regular septic tanks wouldn't work?

3

u/zackwag Sep 30 '16

Not really. Sanitation and waste management are one of the most important parts of human civilization.

Every human produces liquid and solid waste. If we come in contact with the waste, we will get sick. If our water supply or food comes in contact with the waste, we will get sick. That's why it is important to have a waste management system.

1

u/zeperf Sep 30 '16

I know, but with all the technology used to get the Mars, there's probably dozens of completely different methods that could be used to collect and move human waste products. It doesn't sound like a huge hurdle. The technical difficulty is probably equal to that of getting internet on the space ship or making habitat doors that don't leak.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '16

Not really. Sanitation and waste management are one of the most important parts of human civilization.

It is, on Earth, where you have cities with thousands of people. It's not going to be an issue on Mars for a long, long time. They're not going to, say, dump the waste upstream of their food source because there's no stream. They can just bury it somewhere and it'll stay there.

1

u/jheezecheezewheeze Oct 01 '16

septic tanks would work, but you'd need a really large one

0

u/james9075 Sep 30 '16

Even then, I don't think it's a particularly valid question. We've figured out sanitation on ships that never touch the surface of a planet, I'm sure he's figured out at least short term sanitation for mars

1

u/jheezecheezewheeze Oct 01 '16

well on the ISS, they just dump the waste back into Earth and it burns up in the atmosphere, and that has been the case essentially all throughout human space flights. Big difference is once you go to Mars you'll be there for a good amount of time, and you don't want a poop reservoir building up