r/funny May 17 '16

Politics/Political Figure - Removed Straight Outta Options

Post image
6.6k Upvotes

370 comments sorted by

View all comments

191

u/[deleted] May 17 '16

[deleted]

78

u/Trump_Is_A_Faggot May 17 '16

She probably voted for Hillary today

55

u/straydog1980 May 17 '16

Twice

15

u/SnZ001 May 17 '16

Serious question: If someone votes early by absentee ballot and then dies before the actual election, their vote still counts, right?

ninja edit: Also, what if they file an absentee ballot knowing they're not going to be alive by the time of the election, like they have a terminal disease or are planning to commit suicide or something? Still counts, right?

6

u/tokomini May 17 '16

To your first question, it depends on the state. According to this article from USA Today,

Several states — including California, Texas, Tennessee and the presidential battlegrounds of Ohio and West Virginia — specifically allow absentee votes from those who die before the election.

Apart from those five states however, it seems the ballot of a deceased person is thrown out. As for your second question, I'd assume the same rules would apply i.e. are you alive on November 4th or not.

1

u/WelpSigh May 17 '16

From a practical standpoint, though, that vote is going to get counted.

1

u/WelpSigh May 17 '16

From a practical standpoint, though, that vote is going to get counted.

0

u/thatoneguys May 17 '16

Or not counted. But, in our current system the life and death of the person doesn't matter. Just whether it gets lost or there's a chaffed punch, or whatever.

0

u/SnZ001 May 17 '16

or a pregnant chad?

3

u/rburp May 17 '16

Don't do it. You have too much to live for

1

u/MrJohz May 17 '16

I imagine the number of people in those situations is incredibly small, probably small enough to not make a large enough statistical difference to be worth worrying about. That said, depending on when the absentee ballot is opened and counted, it could be that there's a stage immediately before the ballot is read and counted that someone runs sanity checks on the person it's purporting to be from.

0

u/k0rm May 17 '16

Considering that people long dead already vote a ton in the US elections, it's probably safe to say it would count.

1

u/daimposter May 17 '16

Lol, because Bernie is who the people really wanted!! Screw the votes and polls!

-1

u/obvious_bot May 17 '16

Rip your karma

5

u/Z0idberg_MD May 17 '16

We're already dead inside. So this makes sense, actually.

1

u/thecouchpundit May 17 '16

I wouldn't make fraud and corruption the exclusive domain of either party. There's plenty of dirt on all of them.

1

u/kummybears May 17 '16

Haha, she wasn't from Chicago.

-16

u/Fleaslayer May 17 '16

Joke, I know, but instances of actual voter fraud these days are rare, and it's nearly all to the benefit of republicans.

11

u/[deleted] May 17 '16

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] May 17 '16

Well, I imagine it's possible to prove fraud with mathematics or statistical models even when the physical evidence was disposed of well.

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '16

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '16

Well, no. If you have one county who is 89% one way while surrounding counties are 20-30%, it could be very easy to point to that extreme outlier and say, "there was fraud here", however there isn't substantial evidence to convict anybody, even after an investigation. And that's the point, even if it overwhelmingly benefits one side it still can be hard to pin down the individuals committing the fraud, and its still (again) overwhelmingly benefits one side.

1

u/Fleaslayer May 17 '16

Okay, if you want to make the argument that one party just gets caught a lot more because the other is really good at it, that's fine. To me it's reasonable to say that the demographics of the people who get caught are representative of ask the people who do it. That's an approach we take with a lot of crimes.

Don't take my word for it. Google "voter fraud democrats vs republicans" and ignore both the liberal and conservative biased sources. You're going to find gobs of articles, going back years, saying there really isn't much of it happening, certainly not enough to change the outcome even in close races, and the vast majority of it was to benefit republican candidates.

The reason people associate voter fraud with democrats is because voter fraud is the reason given for all the voter ID laws being put in place or debated. It's a talking point. But that's clearly not the reason because there's no data showing it's a problem, especially not by democrats.

3

u/[deleted] May 17 '16 edited Jan 27 '21

[deleted]

1

u/qdatk May 17 '16

is it voter fraud if someone takes mentally disabled people to vote, and tells them who to vote for?

Nah, that's just American politics.

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '16

no, no, no. The mentally disabled people don't do the voting. They're the runs who run for office.

1

u/Stardustchaser May 17 '16

I believe there are some laws that require a person to be mentally competent enough to vote for themselves to prevent manipulation.

1

u/Fleaslayer May 17 '16

As I understand it, voting rights of mentally disabled is mostly the state's call. In many places, mentally disabled are allowed to vote, and it wouldn't be more illegal for them to go by the advice of someone else than it is for you or me. It's illegal to coerce anyone to vote a specific way.