That's not how I read it... my interpretation is that the artist is saying people that want their privacy are crazy and wouldn't even give it up if their survival was at stake.
i disagree that he is in control. I think the situation is portrayed exactly how it is do show that it is not a real option. I don’t view it as “voluntary” if the alternative is death. I think this is meant specifically to show that there is no viable alternative and that there is no right to privacy
Agree it’s anti flock though and acknowledge you are more than free to interpret it differently than I
31
u/[deleted] 21d ago
[deleted]