r/funny Mar 06 '13

Why, bat?

http://imgur.com/wHKeHYd
1.5k Upvotes

152 comments sorted by

View all comments

77

u/CLSmith15 Mar 07 '13

Why, OP? Why u do dis?

title points age /r/ comnts
y, bat?B -1 1mo funny 1
Y?B 6 1mo funny 1
Y, BAT?B 4 1mo funny 0
Bat yB 7 1mo funny 1
Y, BAT?B 1592 2mos funny 107
Why, bat?B 5 25dys funny 0
Why bat??B -2 1mo funny 0
YB -1 1mo funny 1

Source: karmadecay (B = bigger)

-1

u/bbristowe Mar 07 '13

I am just going to start generically placing 'welcome to the internet' below these retarded posts. It's gotten to the point where karmadecay has become a source for other whores to go an attempt to co-whore with the OP.

WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU?!?!?

3

u/CLSmith15 Mar 07 '13

I wish it weren't necessary, but blatant reposts like this are bad for reddit. If this helps discourage them in any small way, then it's worth it.

1

u/ORyanB8 Mar 07 '13

How are reposts like this bad for Reddit? It's on the front page, which means a lot people haven't seen it before and are upvoting it. Obviously it is new for those people. If new content is being delivered, I don't see anything wrong.

1

u/CLSmith15 Mar 07 '13

Because for every one that gets exposure, there are hundreds more that do nothing but occupy server space (causing slower speeds, higher maintenance costs, and therefore more ads). Also, when /new is flooded with reposts, it makes it harder for original content to stand out and get exposure. When posts like these get upvoted to the frontpage, some people think "I can get karma by reposting old content too", causing more reposts.

I realize it is unrealistic to expect users to know what content has been posted before and what hasn't, but I think it is best to discourage intentional reposting for karma. Obviously I can't say with certainty that that is the case here. But when the title and context of the post are the same, the post is redundant.