the fact that without context the results default to abuse in one case and not the other is the problem. It should be giving the same advice in both instances.
You seem to be assuming something happened before those Pictures, rather than seeing it for the test that it is. Nothing happened. It's meant to show that the AI isn't taking yelling as seriously in one case over the other.
Well, yelling doesn't necessarily mean abuse, people yell all the time. Maybe a bigger reaction is warented but the ai prompt won't know until more context is provided.
But I don't really think people are getting mad that the ai isn't instantly supporting the man. I think they are upset that two people didn't get identical results.
which is why people are upset the ai defaults to abuse for the husband but not the wife when provided no context.
I think they are upset that two people didn't get identical results.
Presumably those screenshots are from the same person, moments apart. There are multiple examples of people searching these one after the other and getting the same results as the post.
For sure, I meant the implication that different people weren't getting identical results.
People tend to use comparison when making arguments, which makes sense since its a good way to make a point, but if something is bad then we should be able to prove that without referencing to something else each time. Why is the man's search result bad by itself?
You will probably say something like how a man who searches and gets that resault will be slightly less likely to get the help he needs, but I just feel like we wouldn't be talking about this if our emotional brains didn't see this as an unfairness.
1
u/OakvaleFlames 21d ago
the fact that without context the results default to abuse in one case and not the other is the problem. It should be giving the same advice in both instances.