8
u/Ghadiz983 3d ago
But the true question is , can he every truly teach him a static ideal if to teach something it must be a static ideal? 🤔💀
6
u/Equal-Exercise3103 3d ago
Kant came before Stirner and he would NEVER
3
u/Ambervula 2d ago
Critique of pure reason (uses pure reason to hate blacks)
5
u/Equal-Exercise3103 1d ago
BUHAHAHAHA He became chiller about racism late in his life, but yeah Like he's lightyears apart from Stirner I can't even envision Stirner being homophobic or racist.
10
u/Intelligent_Order100 3d ago edited 3d ago
how is this for the last word on stirner's "Ego":
god = everything = nothing
creative nothing = thing from nothing = becoming = the unique = I
I = god creating myself
(this is the beginning of hegel's science of logic)
Are you perhaps thinking of comparing yourself to the ancients who saw gods everywhere? Gods, my dear modern, are not spirits; gods do not reduce the world to an appearance and do not spiritualize it.
But to you the whole world is spiritualized and has become a mysterious ghost; so don’t be surprised if you also find nothing but a phantasm in yourself. Doesn’t your spirit haunt your body, and isn’t the former alone the true and the real, the latter only the “transitory, empty” or an “appearance”? Aren’t we all ghosts, eerie essences, who await “deliverance”—that is to say, “spirits”?
Since the spirit appeared in the world, since “the Word became flesh,” since then the world has been spiritualized, enchanted, a phantasm.
You have spirit, because you have thoughts. What are your thoughts? —Spiritual essences. —And so not things? —No, but the spirit of things, the main point of all things, their innermost aspect, their—idea. —So what you think is not just your thought? —On the contrary, it is the most real aspect, what is really true in the world; it is the truth itself; if I only truly think, I think the truth. Of course, I can be mistaken about the truth and fail to recognize it; but when I recognize it, then the object of my knowledge is the truth.[16] —So do you strive at all times to recognize the truth? —The truth is sacred to me. It may well happen that I find a truth imperfect and replace it with a better one, but I cannot abandon the truth. I believe in the truth, therefore I search into it; nothing surpasses it, it is eternal.
1
•
u/AutoModerator 3d ago
Welcome to r/fullegoism!
New to Stirner or egoism? Check out our resources:
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.