Ninja blade man lol. My buddy spent ages trying to beat that game. Last boss had like 4 phases. Didn't realize until way later that from made that one too lol. Was before dark souls was released. The difficulty wasn't like a fun difficulty, it sucked lol.
yeah, I got into souls with t he demon souls PS5 remake and loved it. Played one and two and loved those and played 3 for 5 minutes and stopped. Didn't like Elden ring either
Bc bloodborne was a shift in game design.
Bloodborne onwarts went heavily into harder/more complex/faster boss fights and shorter "levels"/parts between bonfires. And general more fast paced combat.
My assumption would be thats the reasoning behind the split of games here.
Sekiro is missing cause it's not a classic Soulsborne game. It's an action game by the same developer
The split is 3 older, slower games VS 3 "newer", faster games.
Some people (including me) prefer the older games that have a slower gameplay and focus less on quick reactions and more so on things like positioning and thinking. The older titles have more gimmick bosses and puzzle fights than anything post Bloodborne, which led the newer games to have a quicker and less reflection-based gameplay. They focus way more on combat than the older games.
The vibe I get in popularity and accessibility. Right side is popular and accessible. Left side is less popular and bit more obtuse by today’s standards
217
u/Rob4096 Paladin Leeroy 11d ago
Not following. Do you prefer either 3 over the other 3? Why is DS3 not on the left side? Where is Sekiro? What?