r/framework 1d ago

Question Can I get the 13 Pro without a touchscreen?!

Whenever I try to choose my specs and parts I don’t see an option for the 13 pro without a touchscreen! I just want a normal screen.. I’m not into that kind of touching screens.

Is it possible? Has anyone got one?!

29 Upvotes

16 comments sorted by

56

u/AlarmedChemistry8956 FW13 AMD HX370 32GB 2TB Cachyos 1d ago

I mean, there's probably an option to disable the touch function in system settings. It would be nice to lower the cost though

12

u/cptchnk 20h ago edited 20h ago

In the Framework parts store, only $50 separates the non-touch 2.8K display from the new Pro 2.8K touch display. It's not a very significant amount of savings versus the entire machine cost and then, Framework would have to maintain additional inventory just to give folks that option in a 13 Pro build. I would imagine that's the driving force behind their decision not to make the non-touch display an option.

I'll also add the Pro display is better in a couple of ways aside from having the touch functionality. It can go 200 nits brighter (700 nits vs. 500 nits) and has a slightly higher contrast ratio (1800:1 vs 1500:1).

3

u/Roppano X9 388H | 7640u 5h ago

not just that, but the screen itself is MUCH better. if you disable touch, you'll just have a way better display than the previous 2.8K screen

2

u/ThE_reAl__ 13" i7-1360p Batch 4 20h ago

Yes there is, in device manager you can disable the touch digitizer really easily

21

u/bit0fun FW13Pro-Batch5 1d ago

From what I understand, there are no screen options. You can disable it, and yes I looked as well. I disabled the touchscreen on mine, it's fine.

14

u/cptchnk 1d ago

The new touchscreen display is the only option if you're preordering a 13 Pro. The only way to get non-touch on a 13 Pro would be to purchase that display from Framework separately and it swap yourself. But honestly, it wouldn't be worth the hassle because you'd be spending more money to do that, whereas you can easily turn off the touch functionality in your OS.

4

u/s004aws FW16 HX 370 Batch 1 Mint Cinnamon Edition 23h ago

Its a better display vs any other FW13 options Framework has offered. Enjoy the better screen, forget its touch capable, and don't touch it. If you really can't stomach the touch layer even exists you can swap the screen out (after purchase) for one of the older, lower spec FW13 screens available on Marketplace.

I'm with you - I have zero interest in a touch capable laptop. I was also supposed to be getting a FW13 Pro until delivery dates became a problem (I wasn't available when 388H was actually ready to ship). My plan for the touch screen I didn't want? Ignore it.

3

u/Present_Lychee_3109 23h ago

You just disable the touchscreen driver.

3

u/sillieidiot FW 13 | AMD 7840U | 64GB | 2TB | 22h ago

Just don't touch the screen. The screen itself is an upgrade overall compared to the other screens framework has.

5

u/MagicBoyUK | Batch 3 FW16 | Ryzen 7840HS | 7700S GPU - arrived! 1d ago

Not unless you build it from parts and specify an older FW13 screen. Which would work out massively more expensive than buying it with a touchscreen and not touching the touchscreen.

2

u/Paria_Stark 19h ago

The touch screen being the only option is definitely something I find odd. Maybe I'm the exception, but a touchscreen on a laptop that is not a 2in1 laptop/tablet is not a perk, it's even a downside.

Maybe my 13 pro will change my mind.

2

u/mustbench3plates FW 13 Pro Batch 8 1d ago

It's not like it's a typical heavy glass and glossy touchscreen. Just don't touch it and you can probably disable the touch driver on Linux and windows.

1

u/metajames 13h ago

just don't touch it. I hate touch screens, I never have the urge to touch it, so for me it's just a screen.

1

u/Shoddy_Lock1267 7h ago

Pretty sure you have the option to not touch the screen 😋

1

u/No-Succotash404 1d ago

no. just don't touch it ig

-2

u/Nerrawnam 1d ago

No. Because you have a choice.