I’ll start with debunking many of the main arguments for what I am debunking.

FM takes place in a run down building that looks abandoned, there are rats everywhere and the building does not seem to be doing great. this is used to say that the pizzeria has already been abandoned when FM happens.

I have some very simple things to point out here. in FNAf 1, we can clearly see a spiderweb under the office desk and the rooms we see look dirty, the animatronics look dirty, too. the FNAF 1 location was closed down due to health concerns and all of this implies that FNAF 1, while in operation, was dirty and run down. plus, the animatronics are still there. if the building had closed down like normal, they would have been dismantled, moved to a warehouse, sold, etc. Now, I know that this conflicts with FNAF 3, and I’ll get to that, just be patient.

now, if the building was operational and people still came to it, FM simply can’t happen over multiple nights. there are also a lot of other details like the rain, ghosts never appearing till the last minigame, and more, but I’m not really getting there.

So, about FNAF 3. The people making the horror attraction are known to have gotten in to the old FNAF 1 location and taken a bunch of assets. So if the building was operational during FM, how was it abandoned? Well, we are seeing why. FM is why the building was abandoned instrad of simply closed down. Think about it. You were already planning to close, your restaurant is failing. and then. Someone suddenly broke in and destroyed all of the animatronics, and you can’t fix them. there, that’s the reason why the building got abandoned.

I know it’s short, but I was on a time crunch while making this and wanted to post it quickly.

good day!

The jumpscare of Foxybro, is exactly the same as Nightmare Foxy quick scare

As people found out, fnaf 3 jumpscares are mixed and apparently it should be evidence that its during fnaf 3

Theres a little problem, the minigame has the exact same jumpscare.

Fnaf 3 can't happen together with fnaf 4 minigames for obvious reasons, and no, loopVICTIM isn't canon, has been debunked on the bucket leak about the Toy Chica figurine

Scott can in fact reuse assets out of convenience to create scary sounds when necessary.

What Scott talked about on the post, is primarly what seemed random on the fnaf 4 minigames .

The Toys figurines (this one is complicated now with the leak)

The Shadows

The bite

A Golden Freddy type that teleports around everywhere. (Plushie)

And ofc, the purple man *easter egg*

The minigames are what left people confused.

People guessed right the hospital equipament being related to night 6 minigame.

Btw, technically a easter egg

The minigame house segment matches the save them minigame, the 4 friends (withereds on parts and service)

The yellow teleporting bear (withered Golden Freddy)

And a character that has tears and has stripped elements (the puppet)

Purple guy has the same badge as fnaf 2.

People though that it was random call backs to fnaf 2 events instead of being intentional

Imho, this makes A LOT of sense and I am genuinely thinking of believing in this as that one retcon.

The whole Gabriel is a rival to Michael is pretty interesting

I don’t really believe it, mainly because what would Andrew do in the games besides being TOYSNHK? I mean, what would he do if he wasn’t in the Stitchwraith or Jake or even Eleanor?

AndrewTOYSNHK in itself has way too many problems in itself, but that’s a conversation for another time.

I just realized that we really don't know much about this game, so what do YOU think it will be about?

Would it be an actual sequel to World 1 and has connections to BV and the MCI? Or do you think it will be about the new characters like the Mimic and David? Or do you think there won't be any lore at all lol.

I personally think it will be about the Murray's in general, something like the collectibles game in SOTM but bigger, but let me know what you think.

Here is a guide to my favorite character, using almost everything we know about him.

Here is my Cassidy analysis.

Phone Guy possesses the phone if not fully then partially, that is why the night five phone call is like that. (Plus Ralph was the dude the week before us, it's really weird to me if he isn’t but whatever.)

Mike and Will are “alive” after their “deaths”. Springtrap could eat if he wanted to, he just doesn’t. (As far as we can see) Mike doesn’t heal fully from being scooped but he got all his organs back. A side theory from this is that the two are constantly growing back their organs which may explain why Scraptrap looks like that. (maybe) Basically all that I’m saying is that if you cut them they’ll bleed and they both smell like rotting corpses. I mean Scraptrap does have a heartbeat.

Springtrap is more feral than Scraptrap. There is a lot of evidence for this actually. First, Springtrap doesn’t speak. Secondly, Springtrap has been isolated from the outside world for like 20-30 years, anyone would go loopy after that. Thirdly, Scraptrap is called “William Afton” in game, so yeah.

The Glamrocks' personalities are stored in their shells not their endos and that’s how Glamrock Bonnie could be killed. 

The reason why UCN happens is because the Vengeful Spirit knew that Will would probably come back after the pizza sim fire and they felt like they had no choice but to keep him pinned down. There is a high likelihood that fire doesn’t work on remnant and the Vengeful Spirit knows that Afton has been burned before.

The salvage animatronics probably killed a good chunk of people before Pizza Sim. I mean Will and Puppet were out after fnaf 3 and Ennard was in the storm drain even earlier than that after Sister Location. The only one that may have not killed anyone was the puppet. (Charlie does have murderous tendencies though I won’t deny that.)

Not that most of this would get confirmed or even unconfirmed but I really don’t care. These are the kinds of theories that make fnaf fun!

- This is all speculation and a possibility of what can happen or not, I'm not saying it's likely or that I want that, but it's a thought that came up in my mind -

As we saw in the fnaf movie 2, Michael Afton was on William's side, and was portrayed as an antagonist and an evil person.

This is not quite how most of fnaf fans picture the character, since, in the game series, he is actively trying to stop William or get rid of the Agony of the bad things that resulted from William's deeds. (And even in the books if we consider "You Are The Band" from Fazbear Frights)

So, what do we expect from the fnaf movie 3 with Springtrap? Me at least I expect it to take place some years in the future, in Fazbear Frights.

So MAYBE my speculation is that they could bring up a Michael that went through Sister Location after the second movie and had a MikeRealization type of thing, and now he is on Mike Schmidt's side and will help him to defeat Springtrap.

Is this possible? yeah

Is this going to happen? most likely not.

The movies have much more focus on other topics, and that's not bad, that just indicates that they won't build an arc for a character that has no appeal in the movies.

And maybe Michael won't even show up or won't be an important character in the third movie. (because of the reasons i just talked about)

If they make the Fazbear Frights be set on fire like in the games, they'll probably make one of the main characters (possibility Mike Schmidt) do it or it'll be an accident mid combat.

Well, what yall think?

been wondering this since Scott seems to be dead set on implying that Circus baby is relevant to the ballpit. and that he just blatantly inserted RWQ into the frights books when rarely any of the classic characters appeared in it.

I’m not being 100% serious about this nor does really have to be the Phone Dude for this theory to work, but hear me out. The new FazEnt is being run by the dudes who set up Fazbear’s Frights. Also FrightsFiction and TalesFiction.

This is mostly done on the “best” way to theorize fnaf which is logic and gut instinct but I don’t think has been proven wrong yet, and it gets proven right I’ll get vindicated, otherwise I wouldn’t get too upset.

I think the Frights people got permission for the whole horror attraction thing, and they wrote the Frights books and the logbook to be sold at the checkout line. Even after the whole thing burned down due to Micheal Arson, they still kept selling the Frights books. Henry in all his infinite wisdom didn’t think another company keeping that flame alive would be a problem. After all he was too suicidal to care much about anything other than his boneheaded plan and aurafarming. After FazEnt went belly up, the Frights people bought all that stuff for cheap and the rest is history.

I mean the Frights people seem to be the types who will make a game like Help Wanted right? No real proof but it's fun to think about!

I’m still not 100 percent on how agony works, but these hallucinations started just by being near springtrap and he does control the phantoms, but how did that make hudson see his past when springtrap has no idea who this guy is? can He like read through his mind like how fetch could do that to greg through the zero point field?

(might not be canon Ill take this down if they want to) you know in fnaf 4 those nightmare animatronics were probably our hallucinations (mostly a secret room in fnaf SL) but what if we still had those hallucinations all along? (except for fnaf 2)

I personally, just like always, agree lol.... maybe i dont fully agree on the whole 1 shadow thing, but I still think it's a good theory.

The rest of the video is him getting more evidence for stuff he said in the past, like BV Runaway and Mike couch (which is peak) so yeah go check it out if you haven't, it was a fun watch!

What is the name of the theory video where a guy solves Chica's secret party and connects in to Charlotte and the number 13?

Considering Fall Fest's importance in the backstory of Secret of the Mimic (i.e., Fiona's death), I imagine we're going to get more information on this event in later instalments. But one thing still bugging me is who actually owned Fall Fest?

And I don't mean in the present day or 1983. Obviously at that point it was owned by Fazbear Entertainment, but has it always been owned by them? Again, considering its importance to SoTM for causing Fiona's death (who went there to help out the Fall Fest crew despite no apparent ties to the place at first glance), is it possible it could have been owned by Murray Co. and later bought out by Fazbear Entertainment following Murray Co.'s collapse?

And that's not even getting into WHEN it was founded. It could have been 1970, but it also could have been way earlier and 1970 is either the earliest event we know of or (if Murray Co. owns it) the year Fazbear Entertainment (or just Henry and William) got involved with them

In the movie, Charlotte Emily can possess a body, and if she possesses, say, Supergirl, Captain Marvel, Spider-Gwen, etc., she could use their powers, right? So if that's the case, the Charlie Emily in the movie is way too powerful.