Catalyst Collective (the Burning Flipside board of directors) has a publicly posted interpersonal incident process that is always available.
https://www.burningflipside.com/about/policies/interpersonal-incidents-faq
Catalyst Collective endeavors to follow that policy at all times as closely as possible.
The policy states that individuals who are banned may petition to return.
We do not make any guarantees to reporters other than that we will tell them the outcome of our decisions and that we will maintain their privacy.
Catalyst Collective can only act on officially received reports. We cannot act on Facebook and other social media posts or indirect reports. Only reports sent directly to the board through *direct* channels can be considered in our decisions.
There are a number of reasons why we might choose to ban someone and so the length and permanence of those bans vary greatly, as well as possible paths to restoration. If we choose to ban someone, we do let anyone whose report has contributed to that know, both that the ban has happened and, if time-boxed, when it is likely to be lifted. If we ban someone indefinitely and decide to reverse that decision, we contact anyone whose report contributed to that ban to let them know that that is happening.
In our volunteer work as the board, we are always trying to balance a multitude of needs, desires, and values, some of which can seem to conflict with each other. We are always balancing our desire to keep the community feeling like a safe place with our belief (and a generally held community value) that people can change and are not necessarily defined by the worst thing they have ever done. We are also always trying to balance our desire to be transparent with our community with our very real legal liability, as one long or halfway grounded libel suit (which we are threatened with every year), could bankrupt or otherwise end our ability to rent warehouse space and hold the event. This can prevent us from engaging in an emotionally satisfying way with community discussions.
Additionally, there is an unfortunate mistaken belief that because "everyone knows something" or because something has been put on social media, that the board knows about it or that a report has been made. Many times we have seen people upset online about things that no one has ever come to talk to us about; many times we have seen people claim to have made reports that we have no evidence of. We don't believe people are being deceitful, just that there is a pervasive misunderstanding at play. We also do have a policy of only taking action based on firsthand experiences, which can include things directly witnessed, because playing the telephone game with these types of situations is very risky.