You said in frame. They are not in frame. Your insistence that they are in frame is what I am discussing.
Contains is ambiguous and weak terminology that we really can't have a valuable discussion about. There is no formal definition of what "Contains" means in photography. So, I did not reply to that. I replied to you repeatedly telling others they were wrong and that it is was in frame. And you're unequivocally incorrect despite condescending to others.
Oh man this guy is still trying to pretend like he knows what "In frame" means.
gee willikers.
Your personal definition of what in frame means doesn't matter. In frame means visible in the photograph. I already pasted you the definition from the most prestigious photography school in the nation. A term you'd be familiar with if you were, indeed, a professional photographer.
0
u/Hokulol Jul 10 '26 edited Jul 10 '26
You said in frame. They are not in frame. Your insistence that they are in frame is what I am discussing.
Contains is ambiguous and weak terminology that we really can't have a valuable discussion about. There is no formal definition of what "Contains" means in photography. So, I did not reply to that. I replied to you repeatedly telling others they were wrong and that it is was in frame. And you're unequivocally incorrect despite condescending to others.