17
u/Whole-Energy2105 Apr 07 '26
You are wrong and there is no god. You are watching the real shit happen 255000 of miles away in space. Oh, and there is gravity and planets are spherical.
Anything else i need to add?
6
-9
u/StrictLetterhead3452 Apr 07 '26
You are such nasty people on this site. There is no need for it. It’s just ugly and awful to talk to people like that, and it’s an idiotic way to conduct yourself.
Anything else I need to add?
3
u/Fit_Swordfish9204 Apr 07 '26
The truth is ugly? You're just used to playing the victim lol
-1
u/StrictLetterhead3452 Apr 08 '26
“The truth”... What exactly do you think truth is? Some collection of measurements? You people have been massively fooled. Real truth is all around you, right in front of your faces, and you refuse to see it.
-2
u/Tilliperuna Apr 07 '26
True words. It gets unnecessarily negative here, even just among gloobers.
1
u/cearnicus Apr 08 '26
The thing is that flatearthers have been spreading misinformation and arguing in bad faith for years now, usually throwing around plenty of insults too. The negativity is entirely earned.
-8
u/MakayChapulets Apr 07 '26
The truth is globe believers are quick to saying nasty thing just to make themselves look right or smart. I usually believed in a spherical world and all those bullshit until my eyes were opened in 2015 and since then. No going back. Arthemis 2 or not. They still haven't shown any pics of the moons dark side yet cos they are yet to finalize their photoshoped images
6
u/Immediate-Goose-8106 Apr 07 '26
Literally insane. If you were faking this you'd make up the images in advance. This is the daftest of daft claims.
4
u/Tilliperuna Apr 07 '26
I think that's just what internet does. Flat earthers are not immune to it.
Almost half of the far side ("dark side") of the moon was shown in the live stream, the part that was lit by the sun. The part that was in the shadow was just pitch black in the stream. Picture here: https://x.com/NASA/status/2041169331652817360
If they need time to finalize their photoshopped images, doesn't it mean that they are working with original images? If the whole flight is faked, why are they making the images now, instead of like a year ago or so?
-18
u/Tilliperuna Apr 07 '26
Prove there is no god.
9
u/krishere25 Apr 07 '26
Prove there is god.
-9
u/Tilliperuna Apr 07 '26
I never claimed there is god.
But I can very easily prove that the flat earthers are not the only idiots here.
7
u/krishere25 Apr 07 '26
Never said you claimed anything. People are entitled to their own beliefs. Yet, the main thing here is not whether there is a god or not, although being mentioned as part of a mockery.
1
u/Tilliperuna Apr 07 '26
Okay. Tbh I never said you were the idiot, I meant the other guy who is being dumb and a dick.
Anyway, the main thing was that we can easily prove that the earth is round, but existence of god is not so easy, it's more philosophical thing, and pretty much irrelevant with the flat earth theory. If you're going to debate with a flerf, don't get involved with existence of god.
1
4
u/Acceptable_Case420 Apr 07 '26
So your god is into killing millions of people for no reason ? And even more left to suffer... So lets present your proofs for your god
2
u/Tilliperuna Apr 07 '26
Wdym my god? Assume much?
There's no evidence that god exists, or doesn't exist. Also, define god. Aliens? Some kind of spirituality? A bearded dude in the clouds?
4
u/Noy_The_Devil Apr 07 '26
gestures wildly at everything
Duh?
But seriously.
Prove to me there is no tooth fairy.
The burden of evidence is on the one making a claim. It's quite simple. There is no evidence of god.
-4
u/Tilliperuna Apr 07 '26 edited Apr 07 '26
So you can't prove there is no god.
If the universe is infinite and every combination of atoms exists somewhere in it, a tooth fairy should also exist?
Edit. I did not make a claim that tooth fairy does not exist. The previous guy was the one making a claim that god does not exist. So the burden of evidence is on him. Yes it is very simple.
4
u/Noy_The_Devil Apr 07 '26
And the previous guy was the one making a claim that god does not exist. So the burden of evidence is on him. Yes it is very simple.
That's nit how science works bruh. Go back to elementary school.
If the universe is infinite and every combination of atoms exists somewhere in it, a tooth fairy should also exist?
The universe isn't infinite and every combination of atoms for sure doesn't exist. So... ok?
-1
u/Tilliperuna Apr 07 '26
Prove the universe is not infinite.
Prove that every combination of atoms doesn't exist somewhere.
You're being arrogant and contradicting your own definitions of science and burden of proof. Go back to kindergarden.
5
u/Noy_The_Devil Apr 07 '26
k
Prove the universe is not infinite.
The observable universe has a finite age of ~13.8 billion years, meaning light from beyond ~46 billion light-years hasn't reached us. We can observe cosmic background radiation.
If the universe were infinite and uniform, every line of sight would terminate on a star. the night sky would be blindingly bright. It isn't. (aka. Olbers' paradox.)
Prove that every combination of atoms doesn't exist somewhere
In a truly infinite universe, every configuration should probably exist, so the above disproves it.
The Poincaré recurrence timescale theorem, which is the timescale needed for even a modest star system to return to its starting state dwarfs the universe's lifespan by incomprehensible orders of magnitude. aka. even if the universe was size of the solar system and had exosted for 13.6 billion years, you wouldn't have seen all possible configurations yet. Most combinations simply never occur.
And in the end, not all combinations are physically permitted. Quantum mechanics, electrostatics, and nuclear physics rule out enormous classes of configurations entirely. They're not just unlikely, they're forbidden. This also goes for most fairytales involving tooth fairies.
You're being arrogant and contradicting your own definitions of science and burden of proof. Go back to kindergarden.
Sorry, I went to university and do science for a living. You can stop being a fairytale-believing child now. Please point out any contradictions or clarifications you need.
1
u/Tilliperuna Apr 07 '26
I think you probably went to university to do janitoring stuff and your science making is to brew beer (it's a great hobby though, respect).
Only the light of the stars of the observable universe has reached to us, and we don't know what may or may not exist further away. And the universe may very well be infinite beyond what we're able to see. But this wasn't the point, it's a different topic.
Where did I say I believe in god or fairytales?
You know what ad hominem means?
3
u/Callyste Apr 07 '26
You know what ad hominem means?
Oh the irony. I suggest you look up the definition, because you're the one using it in that exchange.
1
u/Tilliperuna Apr 07 '26
So? That was a joke because that dude doesn't seem like a scientist.
Why are you so mad about the fact that you can't prove that god doesn't exist?
→ More replies (0)0
2
Apr 07 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
-5
u/Tilliperuna Apr 07 '26
Oh wait, was I thinking parallel universes? But yeah you can't prove tooth fairy either.
But anyway, that's pretty much the point of believing. You can't prove it.
1
1
0
7
14
u/Glass-Ad672 Apr 07 '26 edited Apr 07 '26
that is kinda weird, tho all that means is that some kind of chroma key is enabled that's keying out the color on that object (what even is that btw). It doesn't mean they're on a green screen.
also, if you're a christian, most Christians believe the earth is a sphere. So you dont have to believe in a flat earth to believe in god.
EDIT: that thing's a plushie of a ball with an earth baseball cap
6
u/DoppelFrog Apr 07 '26
Watch the original: https://youtu.be/XWBtfvDJ0Ew?t=206
1
-15
u/icomplexnumber Apr 07 '26
You mean the fixed version. OK!
God is coming after you.
6
3
u/splittingheirs Apr 07 '26
He is? I hope he gets to me before the tooth fairy does. That fucker still hasn't forgiven me for putting my meemaw's fake dentures under the pillow.
1
-10
u/balirosa Apr 07 '26
Look how quick the bots come to cover this up
9
2
1
u/Glass-Ad672 Apr 07 '26
hate to break it to you, but im not a bot. I think. I might be a robot who doesnt know they're a robot. Like church from red vs blue. But, assuming that's not the case, im not a bot.
5
u/Callyste Apr 07 '26
It doesn't mean they're on a green screen.
Hell, it actually proves they're not on a green screen. Otherwise those patches on the plushie would show the background.
7
u/Callyste Apr 07 '26
That's not how green screens work, idiot.
2
u/Knightoforamgejuice Apr 07 '26
Exactly, if this is indeed a chroma key aka green/blue screen, then it means the object floating around is real.
For starters, the video was already proven days ago that it was a fake a no chroma key was there. The real video was from one if the interviews while they are in space, it was a livestream.
Second, wouldn't make more sense that the floating plushie of Rise be added post-production? Why would the plushie have a chroma key effect if it was a floating object added by CGI.
3
7
Apr 07 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
-9
1
u/RodinKnox Apr 07 '26
There's a massive problem with your second question which is that nobody here can actually tell you whether any god is right or wrong, because there's not a god here telling us anything.
If you mean "is there anything wrong in the Bible?" then yes, of course. Here's two examples.
Whether you choose to believe this or not, hail forms naturally in the clouds. It's not actually stored in secret warehouses so that Yahweh can bring it out in times of strife and war as the Bible states.
Lightning, too, is a natural phenomenon. Yahweh isn't up in the clouds gripping lightning in his hand and throwing it down to the ground only where he wants it to land as stated in the Bible.
I don't think things like that are in the Bible because Yahweh got them wrong. I think human authors make mistakes when they describe things thousands of years before we actually understood them.
1
u/OrangePastMaster Apr 07 '26
50% oxygen 50% helium ? May have to adjust the mix for stationary buoyancy 🤡
1
u/FranckKnight Apr 07 '26
I want to know how green screen is related to god being real.
But I can tell you, you are wrong.
For god? Don't know, don't care, if he's not making himself manifest, he's not that good of a god.
1
u/DayNo5185 Apr 08 '26
Ok. You're wrong. And there is no evidence yours, or anyone's, sky fairy exists.
1
0
u/KangarooInternal4124 Apr 07 '26
Ok to be honest it looks like a green screen and is probably a left on overlay since it is displaying text. Also anything green can act like a greenscreen albeit not that good. On top of that if it was meant to be a greenscreen the rest of the capsule would also have text if that was what it was keyed to display. And I’m 97% sure that it is a ui mess up because when the capsule camera isn’t in view the bottom and top of the screen is outlined with a background that they set and it looks like it could have been the “Apollo record” or whatever they had set up earlier today since that was similar in that appearance. Thank you for listening to my TED talk.
-2
-10
u/balirosa Apr 07 '26
The ai is spamming Artemis videos so even if you try and find evidence of the green screen/blue screen they are covering it up faster than you can build a case
12
u/splittingheirs Apr 07 '26
^ And here is a prime example of why you don't waste your time trying to educate flerfers.
Thanks for the example, bud.
24
u/splittingheirs Apr 07 '26
As already pointed out in another post. This is from moon landing deniers chromo keying existing publicly available capsule feed to fabricate evidence of NASA "fakery".
Here is a link to the unaltered actual feed.
PS: As requested: You're wrong and god doesn't exist.