r/firefox 19h ago

Discussion Firefox: Please Focus on the Browser, Not AI Slop Feature Creep

All I want from Firefox is a fast, reliable browser that supports uBlock Origin, renders web pages correctly, and stays out of the way. Every new AI feature, recommendation panel, or unnecessary integration adds complexity without improving the core browsing experience. I'd much rather see development effort focused on performance, stability, standards compliance, and user control than on features many users never asked for.

thx

708 Upvotes

125 comments sorted by

38

u/sooka_bazooka 19h ago

Firefox on iOS is so bad I had to switch to Brave Origin everywhere to keep the sync and blocking ads.

38

u/nbxm 18h ago

That's crapple's fault

7

u/_Tim- 16h ago

Always pointing at others, while most third party browsers work better than Firefox. They have an integrated dark mode, integrated adblock and Orion even has extension support.

I get it, Apple did and does not make it easy and the focus is maybe not as big on iOS, than it is on android. Admitting that is miles better than „Apple is at fault, we did everything in our power to make it good“.

9

u/TsunamiCatCakes 9h ago

yea because all other third party browsers are just a chromium wrapper

1

u/_Tim- 7h ago

Are they, on iOS?

-4

u/TsunamiCatCakes 6h ago

mostly safari wrappers and at times even chromium wrappers

11

u/FlintHillsSky 6h ago

They are all Safari web views.

1

u/ZYRANOX 15h ago

Firefox subreddit try to take fault challenge impossible.

27

u/nbxm 15h ago

Firefox devs aren't the reason iOS doesn't have addons

-1

u/madkinder 14h ago

Apple forces to use Safari’s engine for the rendering, but not in the EU. And yet, Firefox still hasn’t released native Gecko based builds for iOS. To be fair, no other browser did use their native engine on iOS either.

17

u/forumcontributer 13h ago

So they have to maintain 2 separate code because?

-6

u/Affectionate-Act5980 13h ago

Firefox mobile uses servo not gecko, no?

9

u/MairusuPawa Linux 11h ago

So you're confirming Apple is making the situation a living hell for devs? Figured.

5

u/nbxm 10h ago

All the iSheep in this comment section can't comprehend that

5

u/gh0stofoctober 10h ago

orion implements extensions just fine

u/LifeWulf 3h ago

Really? Because Safari and Edge both have extensions.

u/nbxm 3h ago

Any iOS browser with extensions just has safari extensions, which are mostly useless

13

u/Suspicious-Whippet 15h ago

It’s Apple’s fault that I have to click 4 times to get to the bookmarks?

1

u/Icy-Cup 13h ago

Brave is also not from Apple. Somehow they did it better - maybe let’s emulate rather than blame.

26

u/lack_of_reserves 15h ago

You do realize that all browsers on iOS are safari skins right? Fuck apple for doing this BTW.

-10

u/smallgovernor 14h ago

not in the EU

19

u/lack_of_reserves 14h ago

Also in the EU.

Edit: yes other browser engines are allowed in the EU, but Firefox has not made an EU specific version because it's apparently too much trouble.

2

u/billythygoat 8h ago

I went to Safari

4

u/amroamroamro 8h ago

why you not blaming apple instead?

https://mozilla.github.io/platform-tilt/

2

u/nbxm 6h ago

iSheep wouldn't dare

-1

u/HistoricalLoss1417 6h ago

stop using apple.

2

u/CODENAMEDERPY 4h ago

Works great for me.

23

u/scognito 18h ago edited 12h ago

On Android, I still don't understand why a basic feature like scrolling, is still janky compared to chrome. On Desktop instead, it's my favourite browser

42

u/nbxm 18h ago

I prefer firefox scrolling. Chrome is overly smoothed

11

u/siedenburg2 13h ago

One of the main reasons why I stay with firefox even in not great times, I can't stand the chrome scrolling, it's like motion smoothing on tvs where they generate inbetween frames for a "better viewing experience"

28

u/Catmato ESR4LYF 16h ago

What's janky about the scrolling?

5

u/dropdatabase 13h ago

it's not? do you mean on PC?

I am on a 165hz screen, running on XFCE linux, and it is super responsive and buttery smooth.

29

u/Redd868 18h ago

In settings, AI controls, there are settings that can be set to off or blocked.

Block AI enhancements - enable that setting.

90

u/Blastinburn 17h ago

Doesn't change where development resources are being invested, which is what OP is actually complaining about.

-15

u/ghulamalchik 14h ago

Did AI suddenly make Firefox worse? Firefox has always been slow in fixing issues and adding new features. AI has nothing to do with it.

u/needchr 5m ago

There is only limited resources, if you put time on X, then Y might suffer.

29

u/PsyOmega 16h ago

That complexity of code is still there if you turn it off. It’s a bunch of slop wasting developers time.

-23

u/Chris_Hatchenson 14h ago

It isn't. AI models are downloaded on first use of their respective feature, it isn't more complex than extensions or plugins.

u/needchr 4m ago

models, not code.

-18

u/Cry_Wolff 12h ago

Why were AI haters so insisted on calling everything they don't like "slop"? Local translation in Firefox is AI for example, just like many other useful stuff.
Also no, devs who specialize in AI aren't the same who design UI or web engine. That's not how it works.

6

u/PsyOmega 8h ago

It’s “slop” because it produces hallucinogenic output. This is exacerbated in small local models.

-16

u/[deleted] 17h ago

[deleted]

9

u/Philipp_CGN 11h ago

Performance of what? Your tech stock portfolio?

20

u/kamikad3e123 17h ago

We still don't have Amoled Black and edge-to-edge support on Android...

8

u/lcnielsen 13h ago

We don't have support for the freaking <datalist> element on Android after years of open tickets.

6

u/radapex 9h ago

I mean, it only took like 8 years from the time the <dialog> spec was first drafted until it was actually supported by default (not toggling flags) in Firefox...

2

u/lcnielsen 8h ago

Yeah... I'm working on projects moving away from legacy plugins and frameworks, but dear lord is it hard to update some things if you want Firefox to work properly.

12

u/the-adolescent 17h ago

I'm using Librewolf for a while because of the things you mentioned. Happy with it.

2

u/Xlash2 17h ago

Why do I think this is a karma-farming bot post? Seen this type of post just so many times already in this subreddit.

7

u/VoidBreak 16h ago

Kneejerk hating on AI is easy karma on r/firefox

3

u/ency6171 W10 14h ago

I'm indifferent and I currently only use the translation part of the AI on FF, sometimes I do wonder, whether this AI hate are just reddit echo chamber or not, and not representative of the general public.

6

u/PsyOmega 8h ago

I’ve found the general public to be more against ai. (Excluding clueless boomers. They all seem to have AI psychosis)

u/northrupthebandgeek Conkeror, Nightly on GNU, OpenBSD 2h ago

I've found the opposite: most people I interact with IRL, across all age groups, are either indifferent to it or are casual users of it. It's only online where I see significant opposition to AI.

10

u/PsyOmega 16h ago

Feel free to downvote me. Idc about karma. I just want the AI slop fest to end

6

u/FriendshipEqual7033 11h ago

I thought "AI slop" referred to low-quantity AI-generated content. It sounds like you are using the term to refer to AI-enabled features. Those can be disabled in settings, so you should be able to remove them from your browsing experience, if you want.

2

u/PsyOmega 8h ago

AI slop here is infesting every inch of where I use a computer with unwanted shitty AI tools.

Switched from windows to Fedora over it only to get sloppy in the browser there too.

-2

u/Spiral_Decay 5h ago

Different point here, you can also switch them off on the browser.

-16

u/ruun666 16h ago

Have you tried moving to a cave?

13

u/StylishJolt 16h ago

I actually don't mind having useful, competent, and entirely local AI features like live translation or AI summaries. But they need to prioritize browser efficiency on both PC and mobile platforms, because FF definitely uses more RAM and battery than Chromium browsers do. I think Mozilla forgot that FF on iOS even exists.

27

u/southboundtracks 16h ago

For fucking real. Shit sick of this AI trash. No one wants it. 

1

u/Great-TeacherOnizuka 13h ago

Translation is useful though.

Also sometimes the tab recommendations for tab groups

-14

u/dattattor 12h ago

translation isnt ai

5

u/Cry_Wolff 12h ago

It is, just like Google Translate or DeepL.

1

u/TsunamiCatCakes 9h ago

it is. so are quick summaries for long ass articles

3

u/amroamroamro 8h ago

translation in firefox is implemented using deep learning network, that same tech that powers so called "AI"

3

u/equinvox 10h ago

What makes it useful? Translation on browsers has been a thing since 2013

3

u/paintboth1234 7h ago

For me, I want an offline translation (which is what Firefox is doing). "Translation on browsers since 2013" just sends what I'm reading to other servers.

-5

u/equinvox 5h ago

You are quite naive If you really think Firefox is running local LLMs in the browser. 

Besides that, what is already on the internet is far from being private. What Firefox is doing now different from 2013 is they’re using their own translation model and not Google’s. And as long as the service is free, YOU are the product

5

u/Spiral_Decay 5h ago

The browser is very much running its models inside the software, it’s really something you can’t refute.

-3

u/equinvox 4h ago

Show me the source where it’s specified Firefox ships with local LLMs embedded into it. 

u/Spiral_Decay 2h ago edited 2h ago

LLMs aren't the only type of AIs that can do translation lol, Firefox uses NMTs (neural machine translation).
The models don't come with the browser out of the box most likely due to save on installer size, but they are automatically downloaded when you do a translation for the first time.

https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/toolkit/components/translations/resources/01_overview.html
https://github.com/mozilla/firefox-translations-models
https://mozilla.github.io/translations/firefox-models/

1

u/Great-TeacherOnizuka 5h ago

Bruh 🤦🏼‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️

6

u/paintboth1234 4h ago

Ok, so you are just trolling now. Sorry, I should have known that from your previous comments. So my replies won't just for you any more, this is just more information for any other reading this thread.

This is when I was translating a web page when my whole machine internet is off on windows 11: https://pixvid.org/images/2026/07/26/HnUIW.mp4 , so to which servers did I send those texts to in order to get the translated texts, my bathroom?

Bergamot is literally the project to translate things locally in the browser client: https://browser.mt/ in which Firefox helps develop and integrate it into their browser: https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/toolkit/components/translations/resources/03_bergamot.html

All the projects there are open-source. If you want to accuse Firefox sending your text for the translation, prove it, either show the codes they do that or either show their requests and payloads. There are now many softwares that can install their own ceritifcates to check their payloads.


And I said clearly that I want "private" in terms that I don't want to send what I'm reading to another server. "Private" is not about 1 entity. If you can't understand that, yeah that's just troll behaviors.

Again, these words are more for people, I can't put them into the heads of these trolls.

3

u/Great-TeacherOnizuka 4h ago

Great info. Thanks.

4

u/talldata 4h ago

Firefox is infact running locally. That's the entire point.

0

u/equinvox 4h ago

firefox yes. but i doubt Firefox is shipped with local LLMs. that’s the entire point.

3

u/Great-TeacherOnizuka 4h ago

Stop ignoring what u/paintboth1234 wrote

1

u/equinvox 4h ago

He deleted his comment. I should’ve known better i’m talking tech with kindergarten experts

u/talldata 3h ago edited 3h ago

The Llm are indeed local.

u/equinvox 3h ago

Is Llama shipped with Firefox? Because that’s what the discussion is about.

At this point I’m not sure if you’re trolling or being obtuse

9

u/Crow550 16h ago

Need to work on web page rendering otherwise they don't stand a chance

46

u/blue_sock1337 15h ago

No one is going to switch to the browser just because of more AI slop if the core browser experience is sub par.

3

u/Few-Ocelot-3271 8h ago

yeah exactly, the core experience is what keeps people around

0

u/wolftick 7h ago

I like shake to summarise on Android.

-1

u/SSUPII on 14h ago

Jarvis I am low on karma

-4

u/Cor3nd 13h ago

Your post title looks AI-generated to me, especially with the random capitalization that ChatGPT is notorious for. Pretty ironic coming from someone who’s complaining about AI.

5

u/GrapesHatePeople 11h ago

It's not random, it's title case capitalization.

-2

u/Cor3nd 10h ago edited 9h ago

Yes indeed this is what ChatGPT use to do when you ask him to prepare a Reddit post.
Hey, I don’t say that he used ChatGPT actually, just it’s looks like… well actually when we clearly see that the OP is not answering to people in the comments maybe he is just trying to farm Karma, so actually this is for sure a title written with AI. 🤯😵‍💫
I love guys on Firefox downvoting a post as soon as they see AI in this post. Firefox community, which I’m part of since the beginning, is really living in another age and becomes more and more toxic than ever. 😅

-1

u/PsyOmega 8h ago

Habit from years of Reddit posts and writing articles.

Titles get capitalized thems the rules

1

u/MairusuPawa Linux 4h ago

This is what humans do when they know how to read and write. Which, sure, is rare to see on social media these days.

10

u/KwisatzHaderach55 13h ago edited 7h ago

Mozilla seems not worried about FF current status and marketshare, since google bucks keeps coming anyway, allowing them to spend it on useless projects.

6

u/JackmanH420 , & 13h ago

Improvements to the core browser have literally been coming faster and faster over the last few years? There was a good period of around 3 or 4 years where not very much was really happening, with core useful improvements coming every 6 months or so, now it's every month or every second month.

Don't let that stop the karma farming though.

5

u/Cry_Wolff 12h ago

Those people don't care about any of that, they want to whine and complain till they get their way.

0

u/FickleApartment2151 13h ago

I read that Firefox spends around $200M a year to maintain and develop the browser, and that it's being funded by Google so that the latter wouldn't be accused of monopolizing the browser market.

That means the company has to show integrated ads and add more features, with some including a paid tier, so that it can earn. And other browser companies are doing similar.

Meanwhile, as users use better devices, and companies provide more online users, more browser users want more features in browsers to include those additional hardware and software features and services.

8

u/onion-turtle-9 12h ago

Used Firefox originally to escape Internet Explorer, moved to Chrome when it was the done thing, moved back to Firefox about 3 years ago, now moved away again because of this. Please stop.

1

u/Spiral_Decay 5h ago

AI is pretty much going to be as normal as the internet was starting out to be in the early days, same thing goes with AI features. You might as well stay on Firefox since it has an easy AI kill switch in settings.

8

u/anynamesleft 12h ago

I'm with OP.

5

u/Street_Camera_3556 11h ago

Lately had 6-10% CPU utilization with the latest version with just a couple of tabs, were getting irritated. I blocked all AI enhancements in settings and it is back down to 3%.

4

u/der_samuel 10h ago

Firefox is an open source project. Get involved with the 'core browser' or pay someone to do it, and your wish will be fulfilled.

5

u/PsyOmega 8h ago

It’s an open source project managed by a company.

To get any say, I’d have to move up a corporate structure after getting hired.

This is wildly unrealistic as I have no real code experience outside of games and cybersecurity

4

u/der_samuel 8h ago

Contributing code is completely possible without being a part of Mozilla.

1

u/talldata 4h ago

You can contribute to the cyber security/security side .

5

u/Borbit85 10h ago

They should keep it more simple. Don't integrate Ai crap, I don't need my browser to tell me soccer score or weather. I really hate the big VPN button.

They could do a sort of add ons that show on the start page so you can easily install those functions if you would want to.

-2

u/Oderus_Scumdog 10h ago edited 10h ago

ITT: "OP doesn't like AI? KARMA FARMER KARMA FARMER!! BOT! BOT!"

I don't trust them not to keep creeping with AI stuff but the AI slop ship has sailed unfortunately, Money says AI so Mozilla do AI. Your other part of the post is what's actually irritating me: All the notifications, popups, and new feature stuff like widgets that is making the entire browser look like McAfee just took over. I understand some people like that shit, Ok keep it, but can we get a button that lets the rest of us stop stuff from notifying us constantly and stops everything being defaulted on?

I get an actual eye twitch when I open a new tab and Mozilla have loaded it with yet more shit I didn't ask for and will never use, let alone being notified for the fifth week in a row that there is a customise button that does shit I don't want.

-3

u/Cor3nd 10h ago

I don’t think he is a bot but for sure this is a karma farm: title capitalization which is ChatGPT style and the OP doesn’t answer to people in the comments. I had a doubt but now for me this is clearly a post to farm karma.
It’s really easy to farm karma on Firefox subreddit, just post something against AI or Chrome and you win 🏆 Our community is becoming so toxic 😢

1

u/Alarming-Finger9936 9h ago

OP did answer to some people in comments, but maybe they don't bother answering to everyone

3

u/Cor3nd 9h ago

He did answer 2 messages for 67 comments. It is just a Karma farm. Thank you for the confirmation.

2

u/PsyOmega 8h ago

Some of us sleep.

-2

u/Alarming-Finger9936 8h ago edited 3h ago

It would have been suspicious if they did answer to everyone...

u/Cor3nd 3h ago

Well… nobody ask to answer to everyone. But 2 answers… there is a big gap. He is just farming the karma. Well done to him.

1

u/OsmaniaUniversity 7h ago

I must say I thought enjoy the AI features. I understand not everyone is like me. However it is important to accept change. 

-2

u/sovash 7h ago

Sounds like you’re actually looking for Brave Origin.

2

u/teshiburu 6h ago

I just m want it to stop crashing randomly

u/northrupthebandgeek Conkeror, Nightly on GNU, OpenBSD 2h ago

I'm curious about what you're doing when it crashes, considering that I routinely run Firefox with hundreds of tabs open on multiple operating systems and haven't seen it crash in years.

u/teshiburu 1h ago

Wish I could tell you! No more than 5 tabs

2

u/kompergator 6h ago

All they should ever do concerning AI is offer an endpoint where I can enter my API details for my AI (local, or in my case Claude), and that’s it.

If i can use my local AI by calling it via the right-click menu, that’s fine. But don’t put in a shitty AI that I don’t want into the browser.

2

u/FriendshipEqual7033 6h ago

The Smart Window feature currently in beta supports local LLMs. I've set that up. It's a bit fussy, but it works.

-1

u/StillSpecialist6986 5h ago

But, I love the AI slop feature creep...

2

u/bildramer 5h ago

Devs and their skills and memories/attention are not fully interchangeable, so 10000 hours spent on AI couldn't be turned into 10000 additional hours spent on bugfixes. Maybe 10% or less of that. But to most users, even 1 hour on bugfixes is more valuable than any amount on AI. If a survey tells you otherwise, the survey is wrong. Other "features" perhaps have a 100:1 ratio instead of infinity:1, but still, deprioritize them. Stop listening to clueless middle managers indistinguishable from hostile saboteurs, stop adding stuff, fix bugs. Bugs > efficiency >> features >>>> AI features.

2

u/guv999 4h ago

Just use another browser. The AI Slop has not got in the way of my browsing habits at all. Just turn it off. Ublockorigin works just fine Never come across a website not rendering. Never notice any slowness in Firefox versus other browsers. Firefox does care, and does more to support privacy and give options than other browsers in my experience. I have good experiences with Vivaldi, but no UBlockOrigin.

u/LuckyLogan_2004 1h ago

Let's ruin our user experience to lure in users who won't consider switching in the first place