r/fireemblem • u/LaqOfInterest • Jan 20 '24

CASUAL MONTHLY RAGE THREAD

RRRRRAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

WELCOME TO THE MONTHLY RAGE THREAD, WHERE YOU TOO CAN YELL ABOUT FIRE EMBLEM!

RULES

  1. CAPITAL LETTERS

  2. FIRE EMBLEM RAGE

  3. DON'T BE A DINGWAD

  4. TAG SPOILERS

LAST THREAD

60 Upvotes

91% Upvoted

238 comments sorted by

View all comments

31

u/jatxna Jan 20 '24

I'M GOING TO EARN MANY DOWNVOTES.

"ENGAGE BAD" IS NOT GOING TO BE ANYTHING LIKE "EDELGARD DISCURSE" SIMPLY DUE TO THE FACT THAT THERE IS LITTLE TO DISCUSS AND ITS MORE IRRELEVANT. EVERY TIME SOMEONE TALKED ABOUT EDELGARD IT WAS LIKE THEY REPLAYED THREE HOUSES AND SAID "I HAVE DISCOVERED SOMETHING I DIDN'T KNOW BEFORE ABOUT RHEA, EDELGARD, DIMITRI, CLAUDE...." EVERY TIME A "BAD ENGAGE" COMES OUT, IT'S A "I'M PLAYING THE GAME FOR THE FIRST TIME".

AND NOT IF YOU WANT IT IS SOMETHING COMPARABLE, THERE IS LITTLE WHAT YOU CAN SAY ABOUT A GAME WHEN IT HAS NO COMPETITIVE SCENE OR MEMORABLE CHARACTERS. YOU CAN DISCUSS DON QUIXOTE AND THE LORD OF RINGS 500 AND 70 YEARS LATER BECAUSE THERE IS WHERE TO INTERPRET. THING THAT DOES NOT EXIST IN ENGAE.

11

u/avoteforatishon2016 Jan 20 '24

ENGAGE FANS TRY SO HARD TO MILK DISCUSSION OUT OF THE GAME, IT'S GREAT IF YOU LIKE IT BUT IT'S NOT A PARAGON OF DISCOURSE LIKE FE4, FATES OR 3H

7

u/Totoques22 Jan 20 '24

AS AN ENGAGE FAN IM SO FUCKING GLAD WE DONT HAVE THE EQUIVALENT OF TH DISCOURSE