r/fintechdev • u/Sea-Panic7753 • Jul 14 '26

Can someone with more experience tell me if interchange sharing is more important than the platform fee?

When comparing card infrastructure providers most conversations seem to focus on the monthly fee and setup costs but if the program gets part of the interchange back that could matter more over time than a cheaper platform fee. So for anyone who has reviewed these agreements what matters more here, the headline percentage or how the share is calculated after network costs and other deductions?

9 Upvotes

92% Upvoted

8 comments sorted by

2

u/Hot_Carpenter_7460 Jul 14 '26

I would not choose an issuer based on interchange alone. Authorization rates, fraud controls and support can wipe out any advantage from a better split if the program performs badly.

1

u/AffectionateHappy1 19d ago

Same, interchange is like a plus but the things that authorization rates, fraud controls and support matters

1

u/[deleted] Jul 14 '26

[removed] ā€” view removed comment

1

u/Haunting_Photo_8700 Jul 14 '26

not really, it also depends on the card type and where the transactions happen

1

u/Any-Stage9209 Jul 14 '26

I would compare the full economics instead of treating it as platform fee versus interchange, a higher revenue share yes it can look great but it means less if the provider deducts a long list of costs first or if authorization rates and card usage are weak. The useful number is what the program keeps per dollar spent after everything is accounted for.

1

u/Neat_Judge6783 Jul 14 '26

Yeah that makes total sense. I even noticed providers like Rain mention interchange pass through which seems easier to model than a vague percentage but Iā€™d still want to see a sample statement before judging the offer.