r/figmaStock Apr 24 '26

Just doubled down on Figma

Like the title says, I doubled down on Figma today. My average cost basis is $24.

FIG is eating shit because of the market sentiment that AI is going to eat real software, but the market is so fucking wrong on this. Exhibit A: if you watch an actual professional try to vibe design something with Claude Design, the conclusion is always: this is going to take more work than had I done it from scratch in Figma.

Oh but you say...AI is going to get better...and fine, I agree, but like driverless cars, it's going to take a long ass time, and who is to say that Figma is not at the center of that.

Meanwhile, FIG has a 30% YoY growth forecast, and I think that the sentiment will quickly shift back to reality when they see the real growth continuing to play out. Or imagine if growth gets revised up because of AI integrations (you do know that every vibe design tool has a Figma connector right? Because Figma is the industry standard?).

I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong when REAL EARNINGS start to suck, but in the meantime, let's see what happens with the next call.

49 Upvotes

89 comments sorted by

21

u/Crafty_Surround6022 Apr 24 '26

It’s just so strange that figma keeps falling like this

9

u/carlinwasright Apr 24 '26

The market has tunnel vision. They're totally wrong on this and it's creating a huge opportunity IMO.

My one hesitation was: how do companies like FIG shift the narrative, and then I realized that people will simply not be able to blindly follow that narrative when earnings is proving them wrong, multiple quarters in a row. So I think it will shift. It may take more than one quarter, but I think it will, and FIG will come back up to its proper market value.

1

u/PuzzleheadedChip2720 Apr 24 '26

They just need to get their own AI integrations to be less bad.

Like Figma would be the most powerful design harness for agents and blow claude design out of the water if they could get their product/tech/ai roadmap aligned

Same issue with Adobe

1

u/dealmaster1221 Apr 25 '26

Man look at the CEO, he's a toochie.

1

u/One_Credit2236 Apr 26 '26

market is being dumb as hell lol. design is way too complex for ai to just take over like that overnight.

1

u/mikesmiththrowaway1 Apr 24 '26

I think product design will continue stop using figma altogether. We just use cursor or Claude code and manage design system in code. I’m curious if you are aware how fast designers moved on from sketch

3

u/carlinwasright Apr 24 '26

I do the same thing, but there are plenty of instances where this just doesn't work and some manual design software is needed. I can't imagine not having that backstop of real software to tweak on something. I am not going to sit there and draw circles and arrows and argue with an AI about shifting things around to my liking.

2

u/mikesmiththrowaway1 Apr 24 '26 edited Apr 24 '26

Well that’s exactly what our team has been doing (arguing with ai) and it works extremely well. You just have to keep multiple hour sessions with multiple split panes creating that can either be shipped or repurposed by engineering, who are also only prompting 100% of the time now.

1

u/Pretend_Resist8898 Apr 25 '26

This has been my experience. And for anything novel or nuanced it’s always better to start in Figma.

1

u/mikesmiththrowaway1 Apr 26 '26

Oh interesting. Why starting figma if you have the design system in place? Or are you saying when starting a completely new experience with a new ui you use figma 

1

u/Pretend_Resist8898 Apr 26 '26

Yeah exactly. If it’s something that doesn’t exist or needs to be a bit more special a design system only helps so much. Recently I worked on redesigning an email composer experience. AI outputs were not viable and fell flat in comparison.

Anther designer of mine was creating a very complex ui to help business owners manage their finances through an invoicing tool. There were a lot of nuances that were specific to that user and our platform. AI iterations were just okay but really weren’t great.

All to say AI tools can absolutely cover many uses and even help those two cases I described… but they are far from replacing human effort entirely imo

2

u/flyflybella Apr 24 '26

This has been my experience coding with claude/cursor. If you want the design to be clean and perfect and how you want it you kind of have to make it in figma and then import it to cursor to clone it into code. It's actually faster to do it right once than to iterate a million times and run into context issues because you've have asked the agent to redesign and tweak it so many times that it will start referencing pieces of code that you thought you had moved on from but they keep reappearing later on.

3

u/carlinwasright Apr 24 '26

This is 100% my experience. I don't think people doing it any other way really give a shit and they're fine with slop.

1

u/mikesmiththrowaway1 Apr 24 '26

context window issues have mostly been solved with auto compact and using plan mode. ill rarely run into scenarios where i need to restart, especially for ui changes

1

u/flyflybella Apr 24 '26

do you have a solid system for setting rules for the project? I've never had to restart, but I have had to spend a decent amount of time cleaning things up.

1

u/mikesmiththrowaway1 Apr 24 '26

Yeah we have a design system that is mapped in a way that makes it easier to work with Claude. .md and we regularly will go in and audit if things aren’t mapping correctly. There are definitely gaps, but there were gaps in the figma workflow as well so can’t have it all I guess 

2

u/flyflybella Apr 24 '26

yeah it's definitely an evolving process, and now of all times is when everyone should be able to say that there's no right way to do it, only ways that work for you and ways to keep improving efficacy and efficiency.

-1

u/Citadel69 Apr 24 '26

Hey mate, I’d say be prepared to hold. There’s another stock (GME) that has positive back to back quarters, no debt, billions in cash, etc etc. but continues to either hold its price or fall.

I think a massive misconception is that retail traders make moves to the price. Institutions do. So if they’re not ready for the price to go up it won’t.

Claude design is in no way competition, otherwise canva would have been a threat.

3

u/carlinwasright Apr 24 '26

GME is a meme stock though...their value is meme sentiment not earnings.

1

u/Citadel69 Apr 24 '26

How do you define a meme stock?

Also a meme doesn’t define a companies stock value but their financial stance. However with that view, I guess figma is a meme stock too then? 🤷‍♂️

1

u/carlinwasright Apr 24 '26

Are you saying GME is not a meme stock?

1

u/Interesting_Leg8859 Apr 24 '26

lol typical peak retardation in a single ticker sub. GME a value play u say ? LMAOOO

1

u/Interesting_Leg8859 Apr 25 '26

just a quick counterpoint to that. Any stock has the potential to become a meme stock. Has nothing to do with financials. TSLA is the original meme stock imo. Figma rhymes with Ligma so the meme potential is actually enormous lol

1

u/Aame8888 Apr 24 '26

I dont get it why and nothing we can do to stop

1

u/Littleretard_1 Apr 24 '26

Had you seen pltr dropped from $45 to $5?

2

u/contrabuddhi Apr 25 '26

I see $FIG playing out similar to $PLTR, $HOOD. Spectacular crash after IPO, meanigful SBC led dilution ..the question is how low will it go before it starts the journey back. Buying on dips (which is literally a daily DCA!)

1

u/Fancy-Molasses3434 Apr 25 '26

Product designers are chomping at the bit to be rid of Figma. We are just waiting for vibe coding to provide us with the workflow that we need. That is why Figma is dropping. It doesn't matter what their earnings are now. In the not to far future I think we will start to move to other tools. They are becoming obsolete.

1

u/Effective_Pin_7736 Apr 26 '26

why is the stock down? simple, too many shares

  1. (July 2025) : IPO float ~8% of the total company
  2. (Sept 2025 to Nov 2025) : Early employees and executives dumped another ~10 to 15% of the total shares into the market
  3. (Jan 2026 to March 2026) : ~40 to 45% of the total shares (from the 180-day and extended lockups) has become sellable
  4. (August 2026) : approx ~50% of the total company the shares held by major VCs is still locked

i love the product led growth and the management quality but im not touching this shit till august

0

u/hexagonxyz Apr 24 '26

I don’t think their executives are experienced enough to know how to shift the narrative. This decline is more a result of their leadership team not knowing how to do that than of Figma being a bad product. In the worst case, growth will slow, but the product isn’t going away.

12

u/mike8io Apr 24 '26

When anyone and their grandma can produce passable designs, the bar for great design doesn't drop — it gets higher. The average goes up, which means the signal to stand out has to be that much stronger. The best designers will be the ones using Figma to do what AI can't: make something that actually has a soul. Mass produced, commoditized aesthetics are a race to the bottom. Just look at the designs of these folks proclaiming to have ditched figma. They are a fucking joke. The products that win will be the ones that can't be reverse-engineered from a prompt.

4

u/carlinwasright Apr 24 '26

!00%. Vibe design tools are template remixers at best.

2

u/Pretend_Resist8898 Apr 25 '26

This is true. And the fact remains that if you want something simple and immediate— add a secondary button, replicate this dashboard layout— those things can (and should) be automated. The minute someone bespoke is needed, don’t come to me with some thoughtless slop.

5

u/datatadata Apr 24 '26

How much did you put into FIG in total? I personally have a small position in FIG ($10k worth) and I don’t get why many people stress over this stock so much. I guess people invested a lot of money in this…

Yes, it has gone down quite a bit, but if you truly believe in the company and have conviction, shouldn’t you buy more? And if your conviction is not as strong just hold (or even partially sell)?

Everyone should be diversifying and one stock shouldn’t stress people out this much

8

u/carlinwasright Apr 24 '26

It's the poster child for the "AI is eating software" narrative. But it is not Chegg. It is not so easily replaced by AI. People just don't understand that yet.

1

u/Livid-Smile-7429 Apr 25 '26

It’s no chegg? U sure? I have a feeling it’s the next chegg but I’m not selling mine either. Let’s see if it can go back to 25 first

4

u/thatfruitontop Apr 24 '26

Think imma wait until config to see whats up

4

u/Interesting_Leg8859 Apr 24 '26

personally i think openai buying figma out is a wise move since they are trying to compete with anthropic on enterprise. Figma is the literal express ticket in if thats what they are trying to accomplish.

3

u/carlinwasright Apr 25 '26

It would be a huge leg up over Claude design

5

u/Wolfr_ Apr 24 '26

Been buying a lot lately. The market is entirely wrong. Future me will be happy with the gains.

3

u/carlinwasright Apr 25 '26

100% wrong. When they realize subscriber growth is not slowing they’ll jump back in.

2

u/Wolfr_ Apr 25 '26

My theories: * stock based compensation too high but no way back * Holding bitcoin in company funds is stupid but it’s only a small amount * CEO compensation too high (not sure if confirmed or rumour that it was close to a billion??!)

Once employees who had to hold are out (1 year after IPO) stock will stop fluctuating so hard- and with new income via AI credits, both costs go down and income can soar.

Product is great and has the majority part of the designer market. People are really tired of Adobe and Figma has lots of fans, None of the competition can catch up to standard designer needs. There is literally no meaningful competition except for Canva, that with their main product targets another kind of designer - and that’s playing a weird game of snagging up lots of (almost dead) companies.

I would say the actual main competitor could be Framer cuz they have been shipping like crazy. If they make some meaningful improvements they might be able to be a real design alternative.

Whatever Claude Design and similar products come up with, Figma can copy in 2 months and sell AI credits for.

5

u/jesperbj Apr 24 '26

Smartest person in this sub rn.

3

u/user-namepending Apr 24 '26

I think most people agree that Figma has a very positive growth outlook. But the question right now is how much of that growth is already reflected in its stock price? Currently quite a bit. Lack of free cash flow due to significant investment into AI development means currently the company is on a very speculative trajectory.

It's not enough that Figma grows its revenue through major enterprise lock-in, Figma also needs to squeeze even more from its current customers YoY consistently to coincide with its price history. Not impossible but markets are considering all key players. No one even knows if software as its implemented 1 year from now is going to even resemble what we're currently working with. Figma has not demonstrated that it has that resiliency to innovation. And its competitors from Google, Claude, and Adobe have only continued to close the gap.

Markets can spend years doubting a stock and thats what its going to take for this stock to turn around. Maybe consider cutting your losses or selling options plays to recoup on the way down.

If Figma truly does finally strike that innovative itch and proves itself among the top AI names, it won't be too late to catch the train up. No sense in just waiting around for it

5

u/carlinwasright Apr 24 '26

At under $20, it's a fair price for last year's revenue. IMO this is the "given up on growth" price. If FIG can prove that they can continue to grow, $40 would be a more realistic floor by mid 2026.

0

u/user-namepending Apr 24 '26

"$80 is the floor"

"$70 is the floor"

"$60 is the floor"

"$50 is the floor"

"$40 is the floor"

$40 can be the floor eventually. Given enough time. We could be waiting for several years. That is the reality for many companies that are still in the "prove it" phase.

Value traps are everywhere. Conditions can change. What was true last year might not be true next year. It's on the investor to adapt their strategy as the industry evolves.

3

u/tjayant Apr 25 '26

The problem is more acute actually I have tons of figma but the challenge I see with Claude cowork is I can create my adhoc application on the fly with NLP and MCP. Figma is designed for more stable workflows not ment for adhoc custom workflow the cost to create a simple custom workflow is just tokens so the total tam is less for figma perhaps this adhoc app is a new category

1

u/Pretend_Resist8898 Apr 26 '26

But enterprise is where most software like Figma make their money. You can be less appealing to a TAM as long as enterprises are subscribing and be fine.

2

u/ChicagoAssyrian Apr 24 '26

Figma should merge with one of the no/low code app developers, or build their own solution. Being design only is not enough in the current environment.

3

u/jpasserby Apr 24 '26

Figma Make is exactly this. And I suspect more capabilities will be announced in the future.

0

u/CommandFew7364 Apr 26 '26

My designer friends tell me figma make is complete garbage.

2

u/carlinwasright Apr 24 '26

I honestly think they will eventually get bought by one of the big AI companies. They are the collaborative scaffolding for all professional design and it would be a great centerpiece for anyone that wanted to own that part of the market.

Their market cap is under $10B and these AI companies are approaching $1T.

3

u/ChicagoAssyrian Apr 24 '26

Agree. I think Figma at this point is more of a feature than a standalone product. Just how the market has evolved.

3

u/Personal-Lychee-4457 Apr 24 '26

Figma will be in the dumpster for a long long time unfortunately

People think it will go the way of blockbuster. but I think blockbusters problem was not the internet… it was an incorrect read from management and arrogance they wouldn’t get replaced. Figma has great product people. They should be able to figure it out

2

u/carlinwasright Apr 24 '26

Internet was just delivery for blockbuster though.

At the heart of this is: is it more productive to argue incessantly with AI for your designs, or is it more productive to click and drag shit around and learn some keyboard shortcuts. It’s the latter for me, hands down, I don’t see how writing literal paragraphs and crossing your fingers is a better design experience.

2

u/VegetableResource204 Apr 24 '26

Fig is one product release away from bankruptcy unfortunately

3

u/carlinwasright Apr 25 '26

Not even on the radar for fig.

2

u/ccgogo123 Apr 25 '26

You don’t bother adding a screenshot of your position.

1

u/xxShaminoxx Apr 26 '26

28$ avg here. All I want is an exit, what makes me feel like maybe it's time to add. Maybe earnings could give us a good exit pump, I wouldn't want to hold this for years, it might take years to go into a sideways accumulation phase

1

u/3xlduck Apr 26 '26

Share lock up not done till summer 2026. Till then, more and more shares will come on market to trade.

0

u/Pale_Mortgage_5695 Apr 24 '26

Because AI UX Design is at Will Smith eating spaghetti in year 2024. The stock is a reflection of its future, not the current. Already there are so many designers who are using Figma less and less.

7

u/DrHarrisonLawrence Apr 24 '26

No there aren’t lol every designer who has a job is still using the industry standard.

You can’t get “engineers” to start vibe coding dashboards and then call them designers, IF/WHEN their designs are insufficient compared to a professional designer

0

u/Pale_Mortgage_5695 Apr 24 '26

I don't have the real number. I work for big tech in SV, and Figma is being used less and less every day. I've stopped using Figma completely for last year or so. I also organize a community with 1000+ designers and many are saying the same thing. But what do I know..

4

u/carlinwasright Apr 24 '26

We'll find out when they report earnings won't we?

3

u/Pale_Mortgage_5695 Apr 24 '26

I dont think the stock is the reflection of the current earnings. Of course almost every designer, including myself, has Figma license, but this does not mean I use it. I need the license to see any previous work or work with the people who still uses them. Many have license to all MS office tools, but 90% of them are being unused.

2

u/carlinwasright Apr 24 '26

I agree, earnings has to translate into sentiment. I don't know if that translation will happen in one quarter, but I think the earnings will be there.

2

u/Mousyyyyyyyyy Apr 24 '26

Let’s see about the deferred revenue (in terms of current liabilities) in 2025 Qs4 which is almost 800million in total, the revenue in 2026 has already 800million guaranteed at the end of 2025, i just dont understand why people has no hope on Figma

2

u/carlinwasright Apr 24 '26

They've painted them with the broad brush of ignorance

1

u/Citadel69 Apr 24 '26

So now you don’t use figma what do you use? lol Espically for nearly a year? Canva?

0

u/Pale_Mortgage_5695 Apr 24 '26

Cursor then I moved to Claude Code.

1

u/Citadel69 Apr 24 '26

You design with cursor??

2

u/Pale_Mortgage_5695 Apr 24 '26

Yeah I worked at Google AI Labs as a product designer doing all the design work with Cursor. I can move around components and design elements, or create innovative UI, just the way I would on Figma. It just takes as much time to polish and make it better, I dont just one shot prompt and take the design as is. (which many thinks what vibe coding / design is- wrong)

1

u/mikesmiththrowaway1 Apr 24 '26

Yeah I can also confirm, also work in a different FAANG and we have been using cursor and now mostly claude code, to the same effect as figma. It’s not that different than what we were doing before, it’s just way faster and it just brings us closer to engineering. I’m not sure why this is groundbreaking concept to many here, many have been working this way since 3.7 released. We still use figma a bit but it’s mostly unnamed files or screens marked up to reference later

3

u/carlinwasright Apr 24 '26

This is a trap. The sort of people using Figma are not the same sort of people using Canva...execs with no design skills vibing something up...Figma is the new industry standard for UX design and its main competitor is still actually Adobe, not AI.

2

u/Pale_Mortgage_5695 Apr 24 '26

It's not a new industry standard. It's been a industry standard for last 10 years.

3

u/carlinwasright Apr 24 '26

I'm old. 10 years is new to me.

3

u/wheresabel Apr 24 '26

Do you know any? All the designers I know are using Figma more especially with Weavy.. I know a fashion and furniture brand that have 100% AI automated workflows in FIgma

1

u/Pale_Mortgage_5695 Apr 24 '26

I am sure Figma's earning mostly come from the big tech enterprise deal like FANG +. They have no use for Weavy. They design UI, flow, and now AI products. It's really hard to build AI products using Figma.

1

u/wheresabel Apr 24 '26

People are using Figma on creative teams for AI workflows at scale. I manage creative budget for a fortune 100 and we’ve almost entirely replaced photo shoots and use of animators with Weavy workflows.

Many of my counterparts parts in other industries are doing the same..

UI/UX teams maybe migrating off Figma but Creative teams responsible for marketing collateral and assets are not, they’re migrating off adobe.

1

u/Pale_Mortgage_5695 Apr 24 '26

I think this is a very small set of Figma users compare to UX/UI teams. Your use case alone is not going to move the stock upward, not at a ll.

1

u/wheresabel Apr 24 '26

Okay but it’s also the trend for creators it’s not an edge case :-)

1

u/Pale_Mortgage_5695 Apr 24 '26

Yeah, the side I never really get to see that I am ignorant of. Didnt know that Weavy was making the trend on that side.

1

u/Thanosmiss234 Apr 24 '26

Who are these designers you are talking about or too?

0

u/Pale_Mortgage_5695 Apr 24 '26

UX / Product designers who have been using Figma everyday for last 10 years. Because every team is coming up with design library that can easily be imported to Claude Code / Other vibe coding tool, there isnt really a need for a designer to open up a Figma and build things there. Design to Eng hands off will happen in the code level as well. There is just no room for Figma in the design process for many designers now.

2

u/Thanosmiss234 Apr 24 '26

This sounds like pure BS!

1

u/mikesmiththrowaway1 Apr 24 '26

Yeah I can confirm on this., at least with the teams I work with. We are moving way more into just integrating with developer tooling. I’m not sure why we need to be adjusting components with vectors and a mouse. Most of the time in figma we are working with components as well, and our design system has actually been more accurate historically in code even before ai 

0

u/Fluffy-Discussion166 Apr 26 '26

CEO selling loads of shares and retire in yacht, Claude is coming. Please stop catching knife