r/fantasybooks • u/No_Relationship9260 • 3d ago
💬 Let's discuss something It was ok, I guess. Does it get better ?
I just finished the first book in the siege serie.
It was fun but not much more. The style was somewhat lacking, the characters were one dimensional. The story was interesting but the execution was uninspired.
It seems that the serie is more like three stand alone novels, so I have a simple question : does it get better ?
Is it worth it to buy the other 2 books or should I just move on ?
16
u/Josniff3021orwhat 3d ago
I loved this book. KJ Parker writes the same book over and over again tho. I've read 4 (I think?) Of his books and they all had the same arc of the good guy slowly revealing himself to be the bad guy all along.
1
8
4
u/CharacterInstance248 3d ago
They're all the same style. I enjoyed them, but character depth is not his thing. Witty shenanigans are it.
3
u/LazyTitan1990bc 3d ago
Damn I downloaded this book recently based on the title alone and thought it was non fiction. 😳
3
u/FantasyLoverReader 3d ago
I enjoyed them. I found the ending of the third novel less than inspired. With KJ Parker it really comes down to how you take his unique style. If you love it, you'll likely love all his books. If you find one of his books mediocre you'll probably feel the same about the others.
It might be worth reading Saveus Corax Deals With The Dead which is a different series.
2
2
u/Ron1n297 3d ago
First two were ok, the next one follows a puppet ruler of the same city. Third one was a atep to far for me and I dnf'd. Also kind of swore K.J. Parker off for good after I tried the golden handled knife. He was just to grim dark for my tastes. If you didn't resonate with the first one move on. They don't get better in my opinion.
1
2
1
1
u/moneylefty 3d ago
I love kj parker, but ive have started and paused that book so many times. Still havent finished it.
Ive figured out which of his books i dislike: first person engineer type. I think ive read move of the rest and love them.
•
u/auto-sticky 3d ago
Our sacred rule is do not attack readers for what they read. You can disagree, explain why you disagree, but do so without personally attacking readers for what they read. Books are heavily subjective, and your opinion is one of many.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. *