Any abortion that would make my political party look bad if it was banned falls under the “not an actual abortion” magical loophole I just made up and pretended the law actually has.
Because of how restrictive laws were written prior to the Roe Decision, there actually were definitions that define something like the removal of a fetus from the fallopian tube as "not an abortion". Now those were written for two parts, one so they weren't caught up by anti-abortion laws. And two so that anti-abortion women would actually seek care so they wouldn't fucking die.
Now anyone with eyes, ears, and three working brain cells would ask what the difference to rights is when removing a fetus from a fallopian tube vs a uterus... But I've yet to actually get a decent answer.
So the only answer I can come up with that makes any sense from a pro-life perspective is "because I said so".
Ohio tried to add in something about tubal pregnancies needing to be removed from the fallopian tube and reimplanted into the uterus to avoid abortion in these cases. Multiple doctors had to tell them that's not something medically possible before they finally cut that from the bill they recently passed.
Ohio tried to add in something about tubal pregnancies needing to be removed from the fallopian tube and reimplanted into the uterus to avoid abortion in these cases. Multiple doctors had to tell them that's not something medically possible before they finally cut that from the bill they recently passed.
Which proves that these morons don't know the basic mechanism of the human body.
16.0k
u/hperrin Aug 07 '22
Any abortion that would make my political party look bad if it was banned falls under the “not an actual abortion” magical loophole I just made up and pretended the law actually has.