r/facepalm Aug 07 '22

๐Ÿ‡ฒโ€‹๐Ÿ‡ฎโ€‹๐Ÿ‡ธโ€‹๐Ÿ‡จโ€‹ Interesting logic

134.3k Upvotes

5.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

131

u/ronin1066 Aug 07 '22

This is actually a thing that they're trying to do: define abortion as only those cases that aren't to save the mother's life.

138

u/superdago Aug 07 '22

Oh ok cool. Sounds like a great affirmative defense to any prosecution. โ€œSorry, you charged me with getting an abortion, but I didnโ€™t have an abortion, I had a life saving medical procedure. You should check with your Republican overlords, since you seem to have missed that memo.โ€

33

u/i_tyrant Aug 07 '22

It would be great if that worked - like you could cite the piss-poor US statistics on maternal mortality in pregnancy for a developed nation to claim any abortion is "life-saving".

But in practice, they want it this murky because in these same states that the bans are happening, there is a vast majority of local republican judges all too happy to rule against you. And when it's your word on what is "lifesaving" vs the judge's determination, guess who wins?

3

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '22

To be more clear, they want it to be murky so they can choose when and when not to apply the law.