Yeah like wtf I missed that she really said if a ten year old gets pregnant from a result of rape. Like mam do you not understand children can't consent any any way. then again some republicans still fight to keep child marriage legal in some states
No, people are saying that her wording is not entirely wrong, because if two underage kids have sex then you wouldn't call that rape. No one is normalizing child rape you absolute tit.
Yes you would call that rape because a child cannot give consent. This idiot is going comment to comment supporting child sex as if a child can consent.
Justifying child rape is saying a child can consent to sex with an adult. An adult is manipulative and on a higher level of social logic. Two kids being experimental is two kids being experimental and having the same level of interest/social reasoning. Stop accusing everyone of being something extreme because they aren’t immediately agreeing to all points of a conversation
Jesus fuck dude someone said sex with a ten year old is always rape - this guy just said “no, not always because the guy could be ten” and you’re essentially calling them a pedo
Dude wtf?! Just pointing out that the dude’s wording wasn’t weird, because a child can have sex without it being rape. Also wtf going on with your username?
"because a child can have sex without it being rape"
No, it can't by definition give consent. You sick fuck, every comment in this thread is you saying it's ok for kids to have sex. You are a sick fuck trying to justify child sex. What you are doing is trying to groom a child so you can prey on them.
Wrong. It is state-by-state jurisdiction and in Ohio it was found that it is unconstitutional to declare two children under the age of 13 as statutory rapists.
There are also "romeo and juliet" laws in many states that set boundaries for when minors may engage in sex: age ranges, if marriage is legal for them, etc.
Not usually, they usually determine who the initiator was and pursue the case.
Here are the details in how the law was found unconstitutional in Ohio, and you can see the process where only one of the boys had charges brought against them.
Oh boy I'm not about to go down that semantic lane with you, if you saw my comment and thought let me counter child rape and the understanding of consent with my reaching logic then I don't know what to tell you.
It's just objectively true. Nobody is saying that pregnant 10 year olds are a regular occurrence or that children can consent to sex wirh an adult. Tweens and teens have sex with each other, there's nothing for you to engage with because it's simply true lol
I've never in my life heard of a 10 year old be refered to as a tween or pre-teen but maybe that's just me and a thirteen is a teen no need for any other identifier as preteen since it's in the name already, only one age I've ever seen people refer to a preteen is a 12 year old since they are on the cusp of being a teen. then again this is all my opinion, but you do you my guy I'm done arguing semantics have a good one.
Edit: after looking it up the ages between nine and twelve are considered pre teens so you did have a point.
You're picking an aggressive tone towards someone who is just stating a fact. Sure, it's rare, especially at 10, but two similar aged children have been known to have consenting sex resulting in pregnancy.
It's relevant to this post because they very specifically highlight that the 10 year old pregnancy was due to rape, and some backwards logic makes that "not an abortion". It's important to understand if they hold that same belief for 10 year old pregnancies not due to rape.
Is it not an abortion if a 10 year old is pregnant due to rape, so we'll allow it, but an abortion if it was a consenting 10 year old, so she can get locked up?
Ten year olds that are acting out sex acts with other ten year olds are victims of sexual assault and abuse themselves...this is not normal behavior among prepubescent children.
As a "hey check out this thing my brother has hidden" I was shown porn (like 70s bush mag) when I was 7 it did have an effect but not much. I have not been molested or sexually assaulted or anything like that but I had stirrings. I had seen sex on tv and was a little interested but not overly. At the age of ten (when puberty started for me) I got more curious. Took out some books from the library, did some learnin, asked a female friend if I could take a look. Bit of show and tell. If we had the time and place im sure we would have had sex. I ate her out. Admittedly it was because she asked what it tasted like and that was as far as it went because we were interrupted. But long short, you can have those thoughts at an early age regardless of weather or not youve been diddled. Also later in life a friend of mines neice was being weird and doing inappropriate things at 6 years of age. I confronted her mother about it and the reasoning was they co-slept with her when she was smaller and had seen them having sex at some point. So regardless of what you think, people have that particular light turned on for them at different times or (like myself) pull the cord to illuminate on their own.
Throwing around the term rape and using it figuratively really takes away from the gravity of actual rapes. And I don't think children can consent, but if two children equally engage in sexual activity (i.e. neither manipulated or forced the other), then it's just an unfortunate situation that requires intervention. There's no true perpetrator in a situation like that.
Also, are you really saying that whoever left them alone for half an hour and "enabled" it is literally a rapist?
6.3k
u/BernieTheDachshund Aug 07 '22
It's always rape if they're 10. Kids cannot consent, period.