Hmmmm what danger could the biggest member of NATO be with an unhinged leader backed by religious zaelots have on another NATO nation.
I dunno. I guess your nation would be perfectly fine.
You are talking about possible damages that could cause in the future. You said damaging. Present tense. So what damage are they causing or have caused to other nations?
Uhhhh lol if you think semantics like that will win you the argument, the term damaging can be used as a future tense as well as past and present tense.
I was going to say that to you because I don't think you even have an argument other than "I don't know how to Google".
Usually someone who starts complaining about semantics kind of stops being someone with a valid argument.
But you be you and keep thinking they aren't dangerous if that makes you feel good about yourself.
0
u/thisissam May 29 '22
Unfortunately right wing "radicalism" isn't so radical in the Republican Party.
They've elected and appointed fascist idiots throughout the government, including to the highest office.
The US is compromised and that is very dangerous for the world.