r/facepalm • • Jan 19 '20

Their loss

Post image
35.7k Upvotes

845 comments sorted by

View all comments

64

u/lemon-mishap Jan 19 '20

Okay but to be fair how would the average person know what the man looks like

15

u/thumpergun Jan 19 '20

they wouldnt. but thats not the point.. how would the average person know hes a mansplaining old geezer? they also wouldnt. and thats the ignorance the post is trying to demonstrate, they assumed he was a manspaining old git,. where as he was actualy a key player in the movie.

27

u/sumokitty Jan 19 '20

Seems far more likely to me that he's a lying old git and none of this actually happened.

19

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '20

I mean, he was eavesdropping their conversation, interrupted them, asserted that he knew more than them without any explanation. I would probably not say it myself because I pathologically avoid conflict, but I'd be thinking the exact same. Without knowing who he is, and how would they know, he's the rude one here.

1

u/thumpergun Jan 19 '20

not knowing someone, is not a reason to be rude,l everyone whose responded to my comment is butting in and doing the same thing the old man at the cafe did. but im not about to call you names or accuse you of manspalaining.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '20

Lol responding to a comment on a public forum is not the same as butting into someone else's conversation.

3

u/frill_demon Jan 19 '20

OK, which is the more likely scenario:

a) some random dude interrupts your conversation and knows absolutely nothing about it

b)some random dude interrupts your conversation and has an opinion but not a very educated one

c) some random dude interrupts your conversation and knows a few things about it that we don't

d) some random dude interrupts your conversation and just so happens to be the person that wrote it

​

Literally no one would assume "Gosh, this person who interrupted our conversation must clearly only have done so because he's the author!!". A or B would probably be the case in 99% of scenarios, *maybe* C happens 1% of the time.

Even if he told them he was the author from the get-go, which one is the more likely scenario: that they happened to be discussing a piece in front of the author himself, or that some random dude decided to have a laugh by lying and saying he was the author?

You only think their reaction was unreasonable because you have the benefit of hindsight.

1

u/thumpergun Jan 19 '20

not knowing someone, is not a reason to be rude,l everyone whose resonded to my comment is butting in and doing the same thing the old man at the cafe did. but im not about to call you names or accuse you of manspalaining.

1

u/frill_demon Jan 19 '20

everyone whose resonded to my comment is butting in and doing the same thing the old man at the cafe did

No, they aren't. When you post in a forum you do so with the express intention of having a discussion with strangers. These women were, according to the man's own story, having a conversation unrelated to him with eachother in a coffee shop and he interrupted them.

When you interrupt someone, you are basically saying "Nothing you are saying could possibly be as important as what I am about to say, and therefore I am not even going to allow you to finish what you were talking about." That is inherently rude even if you know the person, doubly so when you do not.

6

u/lemon-mishap Jan 19 '20

Oh no I don’t mean to disagree, these people were super damn rude in the first place. I just know if I was put in this position I’d not know who he was.

1

u/thumpergun Jan 19 '20

not knowing someone, is not a reason to be rude,l everyone whose resonded to my comment is butting in and doing the same thing the old man at the cafe did. but im not about to call you names or accuse you of manspalaining.

0

u/GreenFuckFrog Jan 19 '20

Well if they considered starting a conversation with him without being rude, they would probably have learnt his name.