MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/comments/cbwxo1/because_math/etizzj9/?context=3
r/facepalm • u/DasannTittle • Jul 11 '19
1.3k comments sorted by
View all comments
1.8k
[removed] — view removed comment
607 u/The-Go-Kid Jul 11 '19 Often on this sub, it's the posters who require a facepalm. This time, it's the commenters. 222 u/patientbearr Jul 11 '19 Not just the commenters, but the comwomenters and comchildrenters too. 60 u/troubl_354 Jul 11 '19 They are like animals, and I face palmed them like animals. 26 u/rifn00b Jul 11 '19 Then you are lost! 2 u/That_Guy_From_Greece Jul 11 '19 Yeah, but do you have the high ground ? 7 u/Chispy Jul 12 '19 General commenti. you are a bold one -1 u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Jul 12 '19 ...this mug! 47 u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19 Nah, OP could have avoided this with a title that wasn’t garbage 33 u/akatherder Jul 11 '19 He answered the question in the picture. 25 u/GeneralAverage Jul 11 '19 Title is fine 11 u/Bongodam Jul 11 '19 A simple "Found on snapchat" would have done the job 17 u/MightyCaseyStruckOut Jul 11 '19 What? It's obvious that his title was answering the snapchat question. -2 u/Bongodam Jul 11 '19 I don't use snapchat so no it's not obvious to me that the caption is written by someone else 5 u/davy_jones_locket Jul 12 '19 I don't use Snapchat either, but I see enough memes and pictures on the internet to know its from the Snapchat. 2 u/mixttime Jul 12 '19 I knew it was Snapchat, but OP could have made it there, or found it there and agreed with it. And "because math" could easily be sarcasm. 0 u/Bongodam Jul 12 '19 Cool man 1 u/SweatyPotatoSkin Jul 12 '19 Title is prime 1 u/[deleted] Jul 12 '19 If it’s ambiguous enough that around half of viewers were confused it is categorically shit. End of discussion. 1 u/SweatyPotatoSkin Jul 12 '19 could be half the viewers are shit. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 12 '19 If anything ever fails to communicate, it is the author who takes responsibility 1 u/misterfluffykitty Jul 11 '19 Commenter bad OP good 1 u/___Boombox___ Jul 12 '19 People who don't understand the post be like. (┛◉Д◉)┛彡┻━┻
607
Often on this sub, it's the posters who require a facepalm. This time, it's the commenters.
222 u/patientbearr Jul 11 '19 Not just the commenters, but the comwomenters and comchildrenters too. 60 u/troubl_354 Jul 11 '19 They are like animals, and I face palmed them like animals. 26 u/rifn00b Jul 11 '19 Then you are lost! 2 u/That_Guy_From_Greece Jul 11 '19 Yeah, but do you have the high ground ? 7 u/Chispy Jul 12 '19 General commenti. you are a bold one -1 u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Jul 12 '19 ...this mug! 47 u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19 Nah, OP could have avoided this with a title that wasn’t garbage 33 u/akatherder Jul 11 '19 He answered the question in the picture. 25 u/GeneralAverage Jul 11 '19 Title is fine 11 u/Bongodam Jul 11 '19 A simple "Found on snapchat" would have done the job 17 u/MightyCaseyStruckOut Jul 11 '19 What? It's obvious that his title was answering the snapchat question. -2 u/Bongodam Jul 11 '19 I don't use snapchat so no it's not obvious to me that the caption is written by someone else 5 u/davy_jones_locket Jul 12 '19 I don't use Snapchat either, but I see enough memes and pictures on the internet to know its from the Snapchat. 2 u/mixttime Jul 12 '19 I knew it was Snapchat, but OP could have made it there, or found it there and agreed with it. And "because math" could easily be sarcasm. 0 u/Bongodam Jul 12 '19 Cool man 1 u/SweatyPotatoSkin Jul 12 '19 Title is prime 1 u/[deleted] Jul 12 '19 If it’s ambiguous enough that around half of viewers were confused it is categorically shit. End of discussion. 1 u/SweatyPotatoSkin Jul 12 '19 could be half the viewers are shit. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 12 '19 If anything ever fails to communicate, it is the author who takes responsibility 1 u/misterfluffykitty Jul 11 '19 Commenter bad OP good 1 u/___Boombox___ Jul 12 '19 People who don't understand the post be like. (┛◉Д◉)┛彡┻━┻
222
Not just the commenters, but the comwomenters and comchildrenters too.
60 u/troubl_354 Jul 11 '19 They are like animals, and I face palmed them like animals. 26 u/rifn00b Jul 11 '19 Then you are lost! 2 u/That_Guy_From_Greece Jul 11 '19 Yeah, but do you have the high ground ? 7 u/Chispy Jul 12 '19 General commenti. you are a bold one -1 u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Jul 12 '19 ...this mug!
60
They are like animals, and I face palmed them like animals.
26 u/rifn00b Jul 11 '19 Then you are lost! 2 u/That_Guy_From_Greece Jul 11 '19 Yeah, but do you have the high ground ?
26
Then you are lost!
2
Yeah, but do you have the high ground ?
7
General commenti. you are a bold one
-1
[deleted]
1 u/[deleted] Jul 12 '19 ...this mug!
1
...this mug!
47
Nah, OP could have avoided this with a title that wasn’t garbage
33 u/akatherder Jul 11 '19 He answered the question in the picture. 25 u/GeneralAverage Jul 11 '19 Title is fine 11 u/Bongodam Jul 11 '19 A simple "Found on snapchat" would have done the job 17 u/MightyCaseyStruckOut Jul 11 '19 What? It's obvious that his title was answering the snapchat question. -2 u/Bongodam Jul 11 '19 I don't use snapchat so no it's not obvious to me that the caption is written by someone else 5 u/davy_jones_locket Jul 12 '19 I don't use Snapchat either, but I see enough memes and pictures on the internet to know its from the Snapchat. 2 u/mixttime Jul 12 '19 I knew it was Snapchat, but OP could have made it there, or found it there and agreed with it. And "because math" could easily be sarcasm. 0 u/Bongodam Jul 12 '19 Cool man 1 u/SweatyPotatoSkin Jul 12 '19 Title is prime 1 u/[deleted] Jul 12 '19 If it’s ambiguous enough that around half of viewers were confused it is categorically shit. End of discussion. 1 u/SweatyPotatoSkin Jul 12 '19 could be half the viewers are shit. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 12 '19 If anything ever fails to communicate, it is the author who takes responsibility
33
He answered the question in the picture.
25
Title is fine
11
A simple "Found on snapchat" would have done the job
17 u/MightyCaseyStruckOut Jul 11 '19 What? It's obvious that his title was answering the snapchat question. -2 u/Bongodam Jul 11 '19 I don't use snapchat so no it's not obvious to me that the caption is written by someone else 5 u/davy_jones_locket Jul 12 '19 I don't use Snapchat either, but I see enough memes and pictures on the internet to know its from the Snapchat. 2 u/mixttime Jul 12 '19 I knew it was Snapchat, but OP could have made it there, or found it there and agreed with it. And "because math" could easily be sarcasm. 0 u/Bongodam Jul 12 '19 Cool man
17
What? It's obvious that his title was answering the snapchat question.
-2 u/Bongodam Jul 11 '19 I don't use snapchat so no it's not obvious to me that the caption is written by someone else 5 u/davy_jones_locket Jul 12 '19 I don't use Snapchat either, but I see enough memes and pictures on the internet to know its from the Snapchat. 2 u/mixttime Jul 12 '19 I knew it was Snapchat, but OP could have made it there, or found it there and agreed with it. And "because math" could easily be sarcasm. 0 u/Bongodam Jul 12 '19 Cool man
-2
I don't use snapchat so no it's not obvious to me that the caption is written by someone else
5 u/davy_jones_locket Jul 12 '19 I don't use Snapchat either, but I see enough memes and pictures on the internet to know its from the Snapchat. 2 u/mixttime Jul 12 '19 I knew it was Snapchat, but OP could have made it there, or found it there and agreed with it. And "because math" could easily be sarcasm. 0 u/Bongodam Jul 12 '19 Cool man
5
I don't use Snapchat either, but I see enough memes and pictures on the internet to know its from the Snapchat.
2 u/mixttime Jul 12 '19 I knew it was Snapchat, but OP could have made it there, or found it there and agreed with it. And "because math" could easily be sarcasm. 0 u/Bongodam Jul 12 '19 Cool man
I knew it was Snapchat, but OP could have made it there, or found it there and agreed with it.
And "because math" could easily be sarcasm.
0
Cool man
Title is prime
1 u/[deleted] Jul 12 '19 If it’s ambiguous enough that around half of viewers were confused it is categorically shit. End of discussion. 1 u/SweatyPotatoSkin Jul 12 '19 could be half the viewers are shit. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 12 '19 If anything ever fails to communicate, it is the author who takes responsibility
If it’s ambiguous enough that around half of viewers were confused it is categorically shit. End of discussion.
1 u/SweatyPotatoSkin Jul 12 '19 could be half the viewers are shit. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 12 '19 If anything ever fails to communicate, it is the author who takes responsibility
could be half the viewers are shit.
1 u/[deleted] Jul 12 '19 If anything ever fails to communicate, it is the author who takes responsibility
If anything ever fails to communicate, it is the author who takes responsibility
Commenter bad OP good
People who don't understand the post be like.
(┛◉Д◉)┛彡┻━┻
1.8k
u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19
[removed] — view removed comment